An observational study in Blood Disease, Hemophilia A and Hepatitis, Viral, Human, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed. Open to male participants aged Up to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-26.
Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Observational
To define the natural history, immunologic, and genetic factors that influence the clinical outcome of hepatitis C in a cohort of hemophilic siblings.
BACKGROUND:
The clinical spectrum of hepatitis C is variable and the factors responsible for these divergent outcomes with chronic hepatitis C infection remain unknown. Dr. Fried and his colleagues are studying a cohort of hemophilic siblings infected with hepatitis C to define the natural history, immunologic, and genetic factors that influence its clinical outcome. Patients with hemophilia have a prevalence rate of hepatitis C as high as 90 percent. The sex-linked pattern of inheritance of hemophilia allows them to identify a cohort of siblings both of who have been infected with hepatitis C. Hemophilic siblings are an attractive population to study because: 1) They are all males; 2) Siblings are relatively close in age; 3) The mode of HCV acquisition is identical; 4) The age at acquisition of hepatitis C is similar 5) The date of acquisition can be confidently estimated upon their factor replacement history; 6) Hemophilic sibs share significant amounts of genetic material.
The study is in response to a Request for Applications entitled "Hepatitis C: Natural History, Pathogenesis, Therapy and Prevention" issued by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Hemophilic siblings with hepatitis C undergo a detailed clinical evaluation to stage their liver disease and to identify sibling pairs with clinically and/or histologically discordant levels of disease activity. These siblings pairs are further studied to define antigen recognition patterns of lymphocyte cells including peripheral CD8 plus cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and CD4 plus cells and determine their functional significance. Using peripheral blood mononuclear cells, CD8 plus cells are assayed for CTL activity against three overlapping vaccinia/hepatitis C virus (HCV) constructs covering the entire HCV genome followed by fine cloning to identify HCV-specific CTL epitopes. Peripheral CD4 plus cells are tested for their ability to proliferate to HCV antigens. Using stimulation index, Drs. Fried and colleagues are quantitating the presence and magnitude of this response. They are also trying to identify immunodominant regions targeted by cytotoxic T cells using HLA class I matched hemophilic siblings. Finally, they are identifying specific host genes that are preferentially expressed or repressed in patients with delayed progression of their HCV disease. They are quantitating the expression of mRNAs encoding host antiviral defense and immunoregulatory elements in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and liver tissue from sibling pairs that have discordant chronic hepatitis C using mRNA libraries that are screened by high density oligonucleotide arrays. The expression levels of these genes (including, but not limited to, interferon alpha, beta, and gamma; IRF-1 and IRF-2; interferon induced protein kinase; the cellular protein activator of PKR (PACT) RNase L; interferon-inducible RNA-specific adenosine deaminase; a ribonuclease specific for inosine- containing RNA; chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR3, CCR5, and their signal transduction elements; 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase; tumor necrosis factor; FAS receptor; signal transduction components of these antiviral pathways, and both type 1 and 2 cytokines) are correlated with delayed progression and diminished pathogenesis in paired hemophilic siblings.
2,710 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.
Browse Hepatitis A studies →University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.
Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
No eligibility criteria
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2005. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill