CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00005009Updated Feb 16, 2017

Evaluation of the Safety of Varivax® in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients

A Phase 1 interventional study of Varivax® in Kidney Transplant Recipients, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Terminated at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-16.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 1, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Slow enrollment
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
2 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to find out whether Varivax is safe for use in children with kidney transplants and whether it protects children from serious infection. Varivax is a vaccine against varicella zoster virus (VZV), the virus that causes chickenpox (varicella) and shingles (zoster).

Healthy children are already receiving Varivax shots to protect them from chickenpox. Few children with kidney transplants have received Varivax because doctors have been concerned that Varivax might cause serious reactions in them. On the other hand, VZV infection can be a life-threatening disease in these children. For this reason, doctors ultimately want to learn whether Varivax might safely prevent VZV infections in children who have had kidney transplants.

Read the detailed description

Pediatric renal transplant patients face a lifetime of immunosuppressive therapy that place them at high risk for potentially life-threatening infection by primary varicella zoster virus (VZV). Treatment for acute episodes of VZV infection is possible but expensive and provides no long-term protection. Furthermore, therapy to overcome VZV infections can lead to renal graft rejection.

Varivax has proven safe, immunogenic, and effective in the normal host and has been recommended for universal administration in the general population at age 12 months. It is not currently labeled for use in immunocompromised patients. However, recent studies in pediatric leukemia and pediatric renal transplant patients suggest that attenuated live vaccine can confer protection with minimal adverse events even in the presence of immunosuppression, providing encouragement for more careful studies of VZV immunization in renal transplant patients. This study aims to quantify the safety and immunogenicity of Varivax in the population of pediatric renal transplant patients least susceptible to VZV infection, i.e., those on minimal maintenance immunosuppression and at least 1 year out from transplant.

Patient enrollment is staged to allow study physicians to closely monitor patients for signs of disseminated varicella reactions or graft rejection. Initially only 1 patient will be enrolled in the study. If the first patient reaches Week 8 without a severe adverse reaction, 3 study centers will then enroll 3 additional patients. If 8 weeks later these 3 patients have had no severe adverse reactions, the same 3 study centers will enroll 3 more patients. At the end of this period, having ascertained the safety of the vaccine in the first 7 patients, the study will be opened to the remaining centers. Patients receive 2 doses of Varivax 6 to 8 weeks apart. Each week for 6 to 8 weeks after the first vaccine dose, the patient undergoes venipuncture and clinical assessment to characterize renal graft and liver function and identify any signs of varicella infection. Additional telephone follow-up occurs on Day 4 and twice weekly thereafter. Parents or guardians monitor the patient for evidence of rash or fever and immediately report any rashes or fevers to study physicians. If, after 6 to 8 weeks, the patient demonstrates no severe reactions to the vaccine and requires no antiviral therapy, the patient receives the second vaccine dose. The patient again receives weekly on-site and telephone follow-up for 6 weeks. Other visits occur 9 weeks and 14 weeks after the second vaccine dose and 1 year after the first vaccine dose. At these visits the patient undergoes venipuncture and clinical assessment to identify potential rejection events or varicella infection and to characterize VZV antibody responses and cytokine changes in response to the vaccine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplant Recipients

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pediatric renal transplant recipients
  • varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccine
  • herpes zoster vaccine
  • VZV susceptible
  • safety
  • immunogenicity
03

In context

Herpes Zoster

360 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Zoster; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 250 across 299 interventional studies indexed under Herpes Zoster.

Browse Herpes Zoster studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,401 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Of its 396 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 294 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Your child may be eligible for this trial if he/she:

  • Had a kidney transplant 1 year ago or more;
  • Is between 2 and 21 years of age (parent or guardian's signed informed consent required if under 18);
  • Is taking stable, maintenance doses of immunosuppressive drugs for his/her kidney transplant; and
  • Is generally in good health.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Your child will not be eligible for this trial if he/she:

  • Has had any rejection episodes in the last 6 months or has other problems with their kidneys;
  • Was in the hospital for a major infection in the last 30 days;
  • Has a history of VZV infection, including chicken pox or shingles;
  • Has ever received a VZV vaccine, including Varivax®;
  • Lives with a person whose immune system does not work well;
  • Is allergic to certain medications;
  • Is unable to return for the prescribed follow-up check-ups;
  • Has no phone or pager; or
  • Has had blood or plasma transfusions or taken certain drugs in the last 6 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Varivax®

    0.5 mL of Varivax administered subcutaneously in the right upper arm (deltoid region).

    Biological: Varivax®

Interventions

  • BiologicalVarivax®

    Each participant will receive 2 doses of Varivax 6 to 8 weeks apart.

    Also known as: live-attenuated varicella zoster virus vaccine, varicella zoster virus vaccine, Oka-Merck live virus vaccine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Immediate adverse reactions

    Time frame: 30 minutes post vaccination

  2. Varicella related adverse reactions

    1. Fever and local (\<1 inch from inoculation site) lesions 2. Fever and lesions outside the 1 inch inoculation site 3. Lesions outside the 1 inch inoculation site 4. Clinical signs of pneumonitis 5. Clinical or chemical signs of hepatitis 6. Development of thrombocytopenia

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Rejection events

    1. Increase in creatinine 2. Renal biopsy

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham - Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU)
    Birmingham, Alabama 35401, United States
  • Boston Children's Hospital - Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU)
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • University of Michigan - Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU)
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, United States
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio - Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU)
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Participant level data and additional relevant materials are available to the public in the Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort). ImmPort is a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 16, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00005009
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Cooperative Clinical Trials in Pediatric Transplantation, North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS), NIAID Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units (VTEUs)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 31, 2001
Start date
Feb 1998
Primary completion
Jun 16, 2001
Completion
Jun 16, 2001
Last update
Feb 16, 2017

Study contacts

Amir Tejani, MD
study chair · North American Pediatric Renal Transplantation Study (NAPRTCS)
Beverly L. Connelly, MD
study chair · Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU)-Cincinnati Children's

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion