ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07931079MERAUpdated Nov 12, 2026

Aggression in Military Personnel

An interventional study of Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) and Self-Monitoring in Aggression, Anger and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), sponsored by James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-12.

Sponsored by James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 12, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
106
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

We propose to study if Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) is helpful in reducing anger and aggression in active duty service members by comparing it to self monitoring of one's anger and aggression. The proposed study has two treatment groups. The first group will receive MERA and then monitor their anger and aggression for 3 more weeks. The second group will be asked to monitor their anger and aggression for 3 weeks prior to receiving MERA. All service members will receive MERA and will be asked to self-monitor, but the order in which they are asked to complete these tasks will be randomized.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aggression
  • Anger
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Keywords

  • anger
  • aggression
  • service member
  • PTSD
03

In context

Aggression

249 studies on the registry are indexed under Aggression; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 106 is above the median of 80 across 222 interventional studies indexed under Aggression.

Browse Aggression studies →

Lead sponsor

James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Active duty service member 18 years or older.
  2. Currently meets criteria for full or subthreshold PTSD, determined by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for -R (CAPS-5-R; Jackson et al., 2024) endorsing trauma exposure and a score of > 3 on at least 1 Cluster B, 1 Cluster C, 1 Cluster D, and 1 Cluster E symptom. Symptoms must be present for at least 1 month with distress and/or functional impairment (items 23-25 with scores of > 2).
  3. Engaged in at least 3 self-reported aggressive acts (e.g., yelling, throwing objects, hitting objects/people) in the last month, measured by the 20-item Overt Aggression Scale (OAS; Yudofsky et al., 1986).
  4. Impulsive aggression is primary form of aggression, determined by the Impulsive Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS; Standford et al., 2001).
  5. Clinically significant anger determined by scores of >12 on the Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR-5; Forbes et al., 2014) scale.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently suicidal or homicidal ideation severe enough to warrant immediate attention (as determined by the Depressive Symptoms Index - Suicidality Subscale and the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview short form) and corroborated by a clinical risk assessment by a credentialed provider.
  2. Unable to complete self-report measures based on clinical judgement.
  3. Current manic episode as indicated on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ; Hirschfeld et al., 2000) or experiencing psychotic symptoms as indicated on the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16; Ising et al., 2012) requiring immediate stabilization or hospitalization (as determined by clinical assessment and judgment).
  4. Had a psychotropic medication change within 4 weeks prior to the baseline assessment. Service members receiving general mental health services or engaging in usual care will be allowed to participate.

    -

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
106 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) X Self-Monitoring

    MERA followed by Self-Monitoring.

    Behavioral: Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) · Behavioral: Self-Monitoring

  • Active comparator
    Self-Monitoring X Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA)

    Self-monitoring followed by MERA.

    Behavioral: Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) · Behavioral: Self-Monitoring

Interventions

  • BehavioralManage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA)

    Three session treatment that teaches the adaptive value of emotions and emotion regulation skills.

  • BehavioralSelf-Monitoring

    Three weeks of tracking anger and aggression and weekly check-ins with study team to assess for risk level.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overt Aggression Scale - Modified (OAS-M)

    Overt Aggression Scale (OAS; Yudofsky et al., 1986) is a 16-item self-report measure that assesses frequency of verbal and physical aggression against self, other, and objects. Investigators added 3 items to assess aggression while driving and in virtual communication (e.g. aggression while texting or emailing) and gave a blank for other aggressive behavior. Investigators adapted the instructions to rate aggression over the past week. There are 20 items on the OAS-M. Pilot data demonstrated that this adapted measure is sensitive to detect changes in aggression frequency during the 3 weeks of MERA (Miles, Kent, et al., 2020). Self-reported aggressive acts will be summed to create an OAS total frequency count of aggressive acts at each assessment, with greater scores indicating more acts of aggression in the past week.

    Time frame: Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.

  2. State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2: State Anger (STAXI-2 S-Anger) Subscale

    State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 Subscale-Anger (STAXI-2 S-Anger; Spielberger, 2010) is a 15-item subscale from the STAXI-2 that measures anger. Investigators adapted the instructions to measure anger in the past week. Items in this subscale ask participants to indicate how much they are experiencing certain feelings and desires on a four-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Scores are summed to assess the overall intensity of anger felt in the past week. The total score range is 15-60, with greater scores indicating higher levels of anger.

    Time frame: Baseline to 4-week, 8-week, and 20-week post treatment assessments.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Spielberger CD. STAXI-2: State-trait anger expression inventory - 2. 1999. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
  • Yudofsky SC, Silver JM, Jackson W, Endicott J, Williams D. The Overt Aggression Scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Jan;143(1):35-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.1.35. PubMed 3942284 ↗
  • Miles SR, Kent TA, Stanley M, Thompson KE, Sharp C, Niles BL, Young-McCaughan S, Mintz J, Roache JD, Litz BT, Hale WJ, Stanford MS, Keane TM, Peterson AL; Consortium to Alleviate PTSD. Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression: A Pilot Study of a Brief Treatment to Help Veterans Reduce Impulsive Aggression. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020 Nov;208(11):897-903. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001229. PubMed 32947454 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Sharing of the data collected in the conduct of the proposed project will be deposited into the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) and the UT Health San Antonio Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved STRONG STAR Repository (HSC2010-475H) for future use.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: One year after the end of the study.

Access criteria: Any future research using Repository data will require a research protocol for the proposed study reviewed and approved by an authorized official responsible for protecting human subjects of research. The data protections for privacy and confidentiality described in the consent form will apply to any future use of stored data.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.strongstar.org

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Jan 2029, 25 months later.

Of 93 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Aggression, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 25 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 93 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2026
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2029
CompletionEst.
Sep 2029
Last update
Nov 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 12, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 12, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07931079
Lead sponsor
James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital
Responsible party
Shannon Miles (Clinical Psychologist, James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 12, 2026

Study contacts

Shannon R Miles, PhD
Contact
shannon.miles@va.gov
8139-972-2000 ext. 106728
Michelle Gaudet
Contact
Michelle.Gaudet@va.gov
813-485-2968
Shannon Miles, PhD
principal investigator · James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion