ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07926542DEX-EBUSUpdated Nov 9, 2026

Dexmedetomidine as an add-on Sedative for Endobronchial Ultrasound

An interventional study of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Conscious Sedation, Lung Neoplasms and Lymphadenopathy (Mediastinal), sponsored by Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central. Completed at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2026, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is commonly performed under moderate sedation with midazolam and fentanyl, but patients may still experience discomfort and procedures can be technically demanding. Dexmedetomidine is a sedative that causes little respiratory depression. This randomized trial evaluated whether adding a continuous dexmedetomidine infusion to standard midazolam-fentanyl sedation reduces patient discomfort and procedural difficulty during EBUS, compared with midazolam-fentanyl alone.

Read the detailed description

This was a single-centre, randomized, parallel-group trial conducted at the Pulmonology Interventional Techniques Unit, Hospital de Santa Marta (ULS São José, Lisbon, Portugal). Adults scheduled for elective EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) or radial EBUS under moderate sedation were randomized 1:1, using a computer-generated sequence, to midazolam-fentanyl sedation alone (control) or midazolam-fentanyl plus dexmedetomidine.

In the intervention arm, dexmedetomidine (4 µg/mL) was infused at a fixed rate of 0.7 µg/kg/h, without a loading dose, starting 15 minutes before the procedure. In both arms, sedation was titrated with intravenous boluses of midazolam 1 mg and fentanyl 25 µg to a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -1 to 0, and the procedure started once this target was reached. All patients received standard monitoring and maximal supplemental oxygen.

Primary outcomes were patient discomfort and physician-rated procedural difficulty, each measured on a 0-10 visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes were procedure duration, recovery time, total midazolam and fentanyl doses, and haemodynamic parameters (lowest mean arterial pressure and heart rate during the procedure, and their change from baseline).

02

Conditions studied

  • Conscious Sedation
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Lymphadenopathy (Mediastinal)

Keywords

  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Endobronchial ultrasound
  • Procedural sedation
  • Conscious sedation
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

5,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,346 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 3,656 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Scheduled for elective EBUS-TBNA or radial EBUS under moderate sedation
  • Able to understand the study and provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous reaction to the substances involved
  • 2nd or 3rd degree heart blockage without an implanted pacemaker
  • bradycardia (\<60bpm) or hypotension (\<90/60mmHg) at the time of enrollment
  • recent (\<3 months) acute cerebrovascular event
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control group: Midazolam-fentanyl

    Arm type: Active Comparator Description: Midazolam 1 mg and fentanyl 25 µg boluses titrated to RASS -1 to 0.

    Drug: Midazolam · Drug: fentanyl

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine + midazolam-fentanyl

    Continuous dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.7 µg/kg/h, without a loading dose, started 15 minutes before the procedure, in addition to midazolam 1 mg and fentanyl 25 µg boluses titrated to RASS -1 to 0.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine · Drug: Midazolam · Drug: fentanyl

Interventions

  • Arm type: Experimental Description: Continuous dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.7 µg/kg/h, without a loading dose, started 15 minutes before the procedure, in addition to midazolam 1 mg and fentanyl 25 µg boluses titrated to RASS -1 to 0. Intervention: Dexmedetomidine only in the intervention group Midazolam and fentanyl in both groups

  • Description: Arm type: Experimental Description: Continuous dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.7 µg/kg/h, without a loading dose, started 15 minutes before the procedure, in addition to midazolam 1 mg and fentanyl 25 µg boluses titrated to RASS -1 to 0. Intervention: Dexmedetomidine only in the intervention group Midazolam and fentanyl in both groups

  • Description: Arm type: Experimental Description: Continuous dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.7 µg/kg/h, without a loading dose, started 15 minutes before the procedure, in addition to midazolam 1 mg and fentanyl 25 µg boluses titrated to RASS -1 to 0. Intervention: Dexmedetomidine only in the intervention group Midazolam and fentanyl in both groups

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Discomfort Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale

    Patient-reported discomfort during the procedure, measured on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (0 = no discomfort, 10 = worst imaginable discomfort).

    Time frame: Baseline/Day 1

  2. Physician-Rated Procedural Difficulty Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale

    Procedural difficulty rated by the bronchoscopist on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (0 = no difficulty, 10 = worst imaginable difficulty).

    Time frame: Baseline/Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedure Duration

    Duration of the procedure, in minutes.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  2. Recovery Time

    Time from the end of the procedure to discharge from the recovery area, in minutes.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Total Midazolam Dose

    Cumulative midazolam dose administered, in mg.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  4. Total Fentanyl Dose

    Cumulative fentanyl dose administered, in µg.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  5. Lowest Mean Arterial Pressure

    Lowest mean arterial pressure recorded during the procedure, in mmHg.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  6. Change in Mean Arterial Pressure

    Baseline minus lowest intraprocedural mean arterial pressure, in mmHg

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  7. Lowest Heart Rate

    Lowest heart rate recorded during the procedure, in beats per minute.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  8. Change in Heart Rate

    Baseline minus lowest intraprocedural heart rate, in beats per minute.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

07

Study locations

1 site
  • João Freitas
    Lisbon, Lisbon District 1150-199, Portugal
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared, as data sharing was not covered by the participants' informed consent or the ethics committee approval. Aggregated results are reported in the published manuscript.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07926542
Lead sponsor
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026
Completion
Jul 31, 2026
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dexmedetomidine

Start the discussion