ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07924280VATS+MWAUpdated Nov 9, 2026

Clinical Study on Tubeless Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Surgery Combined With Ablation in Patients With High-Risk Ground-Glass Nodules

An interventional study of tubeless anesthesia and conventional intubation anesthesia in Tubeless Anesthesia, MWA (Microwave Ablation) and Ground-glass Nodules (GGNs), sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Whether tubeless anesthesia provides clinically superior postoperative symptom recovery (measured by PSA-LUNG) and higher safety in patients undergoing VATS combined with microwave ablation (VATS+MWA)

Read the detailed description

This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled interventional clinical trial conducted by the Department of Thoracic Surgery at The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. The study primarily compares the efficacy and safety of tubeless anesthesia versus conventional endotracheal intubation anesthesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) combined with simultaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of multiple high-risk pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs), with the Postoperative Symptom Assessment scale for lung cancer surgery (PSA-LUNG)-a patient-reported outcome-as the core evaluation indicator.

A total of 80 patients with multiple high-risk GGNs who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: the experimental group will undergo VATS combined with MWA under tubeless anesthesia, while the control group will undergo VATS combined with MWA under conventional intubation anesthesia. By assessing the PSA-LUNG score, technical success rate, perioperative complication rate, and postoperative changes in lung function, this study aims to determine whether tubeless anesthesia can provide patients with better postoperative symptom recovery and higher safety. Meanwhile, the dynamic changes in tumor markers will be explored to provide clinical evidence for optimizing perioperative anesthesia strategies in this patient population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tubeless Anesthesia
  • MWA (Microwave Ablation)
  • Ground-glass Nodules (GGNs)
  • Lung
  • Simultaneous
  • VATS (Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery)

Keywords

  • Tubeless anesthesia
  • VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery)
  • MWA (microwave ablation)
  • Patient-reported outcome (PRO)
  • Simultaneous
  • High-risk ground-glass nodule (GGN)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 167 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. aged ≥ 18 years
  2. Chest CT revealed ≥2 multiple high-risk pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) that persisted for over 3 months. Following a multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation, these nodules were highly suspicious for . The nodules were required to meet the following criteria: Imaging criteria: Maximum diameter ≤2 cm and a consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) ≤0.5 on chest CT. Surgical nodule criteria: Deemed amenable to wedge resection via intrathoracic surgical evaluation, with an anticipated surgical margin of ≥2 cm or ≥ the maximum diameter of the nodule. Ablation nodule criteria: Deemed unsuitable for wedge resection via intrathoracic surgical evaluation, primarily due to a location within the inner two-thirds of the lung parenchyma.
  3. performance status: 0-1; preoperative systemic organ function was adequate for VATS and ablation.
  4. : Class I-III
  5. Preoperative PET-CT or other necessary imaging tests to exclude mediastinal and distant .
  6. Expected survival ≥ 6 months; able to complete the study and follow-up as required.
  7. Participants provided written and agreed to adhere to study visits, treatments, laboratory tests and related procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior pulmonary surgery, radiotherapy or other ablation within 3 months.
  2. to surgery, ablation or anesthesia; intolerance to tubeless anesthesia.
  3. Planned concurrent treatments interfering with study results (e.g., systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy).
  4. Primary extrapulmonary or other active malignant diseases.
  5. Failure to follow study rules or complete follow-up; refusal to provide or withdrawal of consent during the study.
  6. Considered unsuitable for the study by investigators.
  7. Enrollment in other concurrent clinical trials.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    VATS combined with simultaneous MWA under conventional intubation anesthesia

    conventional intubation anesthesia

    Procedure: conventional intubation anesthesia

  • Experimental
    VATS combined with simultaneous MWA under tubeless anesthesia

    tubeless anesthesia

    Procedure: tubeless anesthesia

Interventions

  • Proceduretubeless anesthesia

    Tubeless (non-intubated) anesthesia: general anesthesia is induced and maintained without endotracheal intubation. The patient breathes spontaneously throughout the procedure. Anesthesia is maintained with intravenous agents (e.g., propofol, remifentanil) combined with regional anesthesia (thoracic paravertebral block or erector spinae plane block) and/or moderate sedation.

    Also known as: Tubeless

  • Procedureconventional intubation anesthesia

    Conventional intubation anesthesia: general anesthesia is induced with endotracheal intubation and the patient is mechanically ventilated throughout the procedure. Anesthesia is maintained with intravenous agents (e.g., propofol, remifentanil) and/or inhaled anesthetics, combined with muscle relaxants as needed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PSA-LUNG scale score

    Follow-up was conducted via in-hospital visits, remote contact and outpatient visits.

    Time frame: Electronic questionnaires were administered at baseline (preoperatively), early postoperative period (day of surgery, POD 1, discharge day), and weekly within 4 weeks postoperatively. All assessments covered the entire perioperative period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pulmonary function test

    Pulmonary function test

    Time frame: 1 month after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The study team has not yet decided whether to share individual participant data. The decision will depend on institutional policy, participant consent, and feasibility of data de-identification. This plan will be updated accordingly.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 12 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 15, 2026
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
StartActual
Aug 24, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2027
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07924280
Responsible party
Xue Xingyang (Chief Physician, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Aug 24, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Xingyang Xue, PhD
Contact
xxy1023970@126.com
+86-15876522723

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion