ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07923669Updated Nov 6, 2026

Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.

An interventional study of Cryotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation. and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis and Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis, sponsored by October 6 University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by October 6 University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2026, registered Nov 2026).
  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Updated Nov 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of conventional, cryotherapeutic, and nanotherapeutic sodium hypochlorite solutions used as final root canal irrigants on postoperative pain and substance P levels.

The study will include 45 patients aged 18-50 years with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis affecting single-rooted mandibular premolars.

Participants will be randomly assigned to three equal groups (15 patients per group). The first group will receive conventional 2.5% sodium hypochlorite at room temperature, the second group will receive cryotherapeutic 2.5% sodium hypochlorite at 2-5°C, and the third group will receive nanotherapeutic 2.5% sodium hypochlorite as the final irrigant.

Postoperative pain will be assessed using a 0-10 pain scale at 12, 24, and 48 hours. Substance P levels will be measured in periapical fluid samples using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

The study aims to determine whether cryotherapeutic or nanotherapeutic sodium hypochlorite can reduce postoperative pain and substance P levels compared with conventional sodium hypochlorite.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed to evaluate the effects of different sodium hypochlorite final irrigation approaches on postoperative pain and substance P levels in patients undergoing root canal treatment.

The study will compare three irrigation approaches: conventional sodium hypochlorite, cryotherapeutic sodium hypochlorite, and nanotherapeutic sodium hypochlorite incorporating chitosan nanoparticles.

Eligible participants will undergo clinical and radiographic examinations to confirm the diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with symptomatic apical periodontitis. Following eligibility assessment and informed consent, participants will be randomly allocated to one of the three study groups.

Root canal treatment will be performed according to a standardized endodontic protocol. After root canal instrumentation, the assigned final irrigation approach will be applied.

Postoperative pain will be evaluated using a numerical pain rating scale at the predetermined follow-up intervals. Substance P levels will be assessed using periapical fluid samples and analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

The findings will be used to compare the clinical and biological effects of the three final irrigation approaches and investigate the potential relationship between postoperative pain and substance P levels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
  • Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sodium Hypochlorite
  • Cryotherapy
  • Chitosan Nanoparticles
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Substance P
  • Root Canal Irrigation
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

October 6 University is the lead sponsor of 148 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female participants aged 18-50 years.
  • Participants willing to complete the entire study period and provide written after receiving a full explanation of the study.
  • Presence of a mandibular single-rooted premolar tooth with vital pulp.
  • Patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis, presenting with intermittent or continuous sharp pain persisting after removal of the stimulus and severe preoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vulnerable populations, including prisoners, pregnant women, and individuals with mental illness, as specified in the protocol.
  • Teeth with open apices.
  • Teeth previously treated endodontically.
  • Presence of sinus tracts.
  • Periodontal pockets greater than 3 mm associated with the affected tooth.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Sodium Hypochlorite Group.

    Participants allocated to this group will undergo standard root canal treatment. Following completion of mechanical preparation, final irrigation will be performed using 20 mL of conventional 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) at room temperature, delivered over 5 minutes without any cryotherapeutic modification. The irrigant will be administered using a side-vented needle positioned short of the working length to minimize apical extrusion.

    Procedure: Cryotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation. · Procedure: Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation

  • Experimental
    Cold Sodium Hypochlorite (Cryotherapy) Group.

    Participants allocated to this group will undergo standard root canal treatment. Following completion of mechanical preparation, final irrigation will be performed using 20 mL of cryotherapeutic sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) at a concentration of 2.5%, maintained at 2-5°C and delivered over 5 minutes. The irrigant will be administered using a side-vented needle positioned short of the working length to minimize apical extrusion.

    Procedure: Cryotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation.

  • Experimental
    Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite Group.

    Participants allocated to this group will undergo standard root canal treatment. Following completion of mechanical preparation, final irrigation will be performed using 20 mL of nanotherapeutic sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) at a concentration of 2.5%, delivered over 5 minutes. The irrigant will be administered using a side-vented needle positioned short of the working length to minimize apical extrusion.

    Procedure: Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation

Interventions

  • ProcedureCryotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation.

    Final root canal irrigation using 20 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) maintained at 2-5°C, delivered over 5 minutes following mechanical preparation. Irrigation will be performed using a side-vented needle positioned short of the working length to minimize apical extrusion.

  • ProcedureNanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation

    Final root canal irrigation using 20 mL of nanotherapeutic 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), delivered over 5 minutes following mechanical preparation. Irrigation will be performed using a side-vented needle positioned short of the working length to minimize apical extrusion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity.

    Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Pain will be recorded before endodontic treatment and at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Pain scores will be classified as mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10).

    Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Substance P Levels in Periapical Fluid.

    Substance P levels in periapical fluid will be measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Samples will be collected at three time points: S1, after access cavity preparation and pulp extirpation, before mechanical canal preparation; S2, after cleaning and shaping, before final irrigation; and S3, 24 hours after final irrigation, before root canal obturation.

    Time frame: S1: Before instrumentation; S2: Before final irrigation; S3: 24 hours after final irrigation.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of dentistry, October 6 university
    Giza, Egypt
    Recruiting
    • Faculty of dentistry, October 6 university · ContactDent@o6u.edu.eg · 0020238355276
    • Khloud Metwally, Master degree candidate · Principal investigator
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 9 months after the start.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 2, 2026
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 1, 2027
Last update
Nov 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07923669
Responsible party
Khloud Metwally Abdullah Halawa (Master's Degree Candidate in Endodontics, October 6 University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion