ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07921927Updated Nov 6, 2026

Conservative Treatment With Relative Motion Flexion Orthosis for Boutonniere Injuries in Fingers

An interventional study of Relative Motion Flexion (RMF) orthosis intervention group in Finger Joint Deformities, Tendon Injuries and Hand Injuries, sponsored by Lund University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Lund University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2026, registered Nov 2026).
  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Updated Nov 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Boutonnière injuries involve damage to the central slip of the extensor tendon over the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint (zone III) of the finger. These injuries disrupt the balance of the extensor mechanism, leading to volar displacement of the lateral bands and progressive development of Boutonnière deformity, characterized by PIP joint flexion and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint hyperextension. Due to the gradual onset and closed nature of the injury, diagnosis is often delayed, and untreated cases may result in joint contractures, reduced range of motion (ROM), pain, and functional limitations.

Treatment is typically conservative and requires prolonged immobilization and splinting, often followed by dynamic orthoses such as Capener splints. However, evidence supporting current treatment strategies is limited and clinical outcomes are variable. Recently, the Relative Motion Flexion (RMF) orthosis has been introduced as an alternative approach aimed at restoring extensor mechanism balance. Existing evidence is limited to small or heterogeneous studies, highlighting the need for further evaluation.

This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility and preliminary effects of RMF orthosis treatment in patients with Boutonnière injuries. The primary objective is to evaluate changes in finger range of motion (ROM) and to estimate variability and within-subject correlations to inform sample size calculations for a future randomized controlled trial. Additional feasibility outcomes include recruitment rate, adherence to treatment, and practicality of measurement procedures.

Secondary objectives include evaluating pain, grip strength, functional hand limitations in daily activities, and patient-reported tolerability and comfort of the orthosis.

The study will be conducted as a prospective longitudinal cohort pilot study with repeated within-subject measurements at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. A total of 25 adult patients with acute or subacute closed zone III extensor tendon injuries will be recruited consecutively at the Hand Surgery Rehabilitation Unit, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö.

Inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, positive pencil test, and confirmed central slip injury. Exclusion criteria include open injuries, significant joint contractures (>20°), chronic injuries (>1 year), previous surgery or trauma in the same finger, concomitant fractures or tendon/nerve injuries, inflammatory arthropathies, and severe cognitive or psychiatric conditions or substance abuse.

All participants will receive treatment with an RMF orthosis according to a structured protocol consisting of 6 weeks of continuous use followed by 6 weeks of intermittent daytime and nighttime use. No separate control group will be included; analyses will be based on within-subject comparisons over time.

Primary outcome is ROM measured at the MCP, PIP, and DIP joints using a goniometer. Secondary outcomes include pain (Numeric Rating Scale), grip strength (Jamar dynamometer), hand function (QuickDASH), adherence and tolerability questionnaires, and recruitment rate.

Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric longitudinal methods, including Friedman tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for paired comparisons across time points.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, with ethical approval sought from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. All participants will provide informed consent, and data will be pseudonymized in accordance with GDPR. The study poses minimal risk, and participants will be monitored throughout treatment with adjustments made as needed.

This pilot study will generate essential data on treatment variability, feasibility, and preliminary outcomes of RMF orthosis use. The results will inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial and may contribute to improved evidence-based management of Boutonnière injuries, potentially leading to better functional outcomes and more efficient rehabilitation strategies.

Read the detailed description

Boutonnière injuries involve disruption of the central slip of the extensor tendon over the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint (zone III) of the finger. This leads to imbalance in the extensor mechanism, with volar displacement of the lateral bands and progressive development of Boutonnière deformity, characterized by PIP flexion and compensatory DIP hyperextension. Due to the often gradual onset and closed injury mechanism, diagnosis is frequently delayed. If untreated, the condition may result in stiffness, joint contractures, pain, reduced range of motion (ROM), and long-term functional impairment.

Current conservative treatment typically consists of prolonged immobilization of the PIP joint in extension, followed by dynamic orthotic management. Although widely used, evidence supporting existing treatment strategies is limited and outcomes are variable. Treatment is often demanding for patients due to prolonged splinting and restricted hand function during rehabilitation.

The Relative Motion Flexion (RMF) orthosis has been introduced as an alternative treatment strategy aimed at restoring balance within the extensor mechanism while allowing greater functional use of the hand during rehabilitation. However, current evidence is limited to small case series, heterogeneous cohorts, and studies with methodological limitations. Further prospective evaluation is therefore needed.

This study is designed as a prospective longitudinal pilot cohort study with repeated within-subject measurements. The primary purpose is to evaluate feasibility and to generate parameters required for planning a future randomized controlled trial, including estimates of variability in range of motion outcomes and within-subject correlations over time.

The study will also explore preliminary effects of RMF orthosis treatment on finger range of motion, as well as secondary outcomes including pain, grip strength, functional hand limitations, and patient-reported tolerability and adherence.

A total of 25 adult patients with acute or subacute closed central slip injuries (zone III) will be recruited consecutively at the Hand Surgery Rehabilitation Unit, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Participants will be treated with an RMF orthosis according to a structured rehabilitation protocol consisting of 6 weeks of continuous use followed by 6 weeks of intermittent use during daytime and nighttime. Treatment is delivered as part of routine rehabilitation follow-up, with adjustments made as clinically indicated.

Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months after treatment initiation. Primary outcome is range of motion (ROM) measured at the MCP, PIP, and DIP joints using a goniometer. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale), grip strength (Jamar dynamometer), hand function (QuickDASH), and a study-specific questionnaire assessing adherence and tolerability. Recruitment rate will be recorded as number of eligible patients included per month.

As a pilot study, no control group is included. Analyses will focus on within-subject changes over time and estimation of parameters needed for sample size calculation in a future randomized controlled trial. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric longitudinal methods, including Friedman tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for paired comparisons across time points.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval will be sought from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Etikprövningsmyndigheten). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. All data will be pseudonymized and handled in accordance with applicable data protection regulations (GDPR). The study involves minimal risk, and participants will be monitored throughout the rehabilitation period.

This pilot study will provide essential feasibility data and preliminary clinical outcomes for RMF orthosis treatment. The results will inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial and may contribute to improved evidence-based management of Boutonnière injuries, with the potential to enhance functional recovery and optimize rehabilitation strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Finger Joint Deformities
  • Tendon Injuries
  • Hand Injuries
  • Extensor Tendons of Finger Anomalies

Keywords

  • Boutonniere injury
  • Boutonniere deformity
  • extensor tendon injury
  • finger injury
  • conservative treatment
  • relative motion orthosis
03

In context

Tendon Injuries

100 studies on the registry are indexed under Tendon Injuries; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 25 is below the median of 44 across 70 interventional studies indexed under Tendon Injuries.

Browse Tendon Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Lund University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • persons with acute and subacute closed injurt to the central slip/extensor tendon zon 3
  • positive pencil test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • open injury or infection
  • joint contracture >20
  • trauma >1 year ago
  • previous trauma or surgery in the same finger
  • simultaneous crush injury
  • concomitant fracture and/or digital nerve injury and/or flexor tendon injury
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • drug abuse, sever cognitive impairment, or severe psychological disorder
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Relative Motion Flexion (RMF) orthosis intervention group

    Participants in this arm receive treatment with a Relative Motion Flexion (RMF) orthosis as part of a structured rehabilitation protocol. The intervention consists of 6 weeks of continuous orthosis use followed by 6 weeks of intermittent use during daytime and nighttime. No control intervention is used, and outcomes are assessed longitudinally within the same participants over time.

    Other: Relative Motion Flexion (RMF) orthosis intervention group

Interventions

  • OtherRelative Motion Flexion (RMF) orthosis intervention group

    The intervention consists of treatment with a Relative Motion Flexion (RMF) orthosis for patients with Boutonnière injuries of the finger (zone III extensor tendon injuries). The orthosis is applied according to a structured rehabilitation protocol consisting of 6 weeks of continuous wear, followed by 6 weeks of intermittent use during daytime and nighttime. The aim of the intervention is to restore extensor mechanism balance while allowing functional use of the hand during rehabilitation. Participants receive standard follow-up at the hand surgery rehabilitation unit, with adjustments made as clinically indicated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Range Of Motion (ROM)

    Range of Motion in each joint MCP, PIP, DIP

    Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

  2. Range of motion (ROM)

    Active range of motion assessed with a finger goniometer

    Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Skåne University Hospital (Hand Surgery Rehabilitation Unit)
    Malmö, Skåne County 205 02, Sweden
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19. PubMed 26092476 ↗
  • Arslan OB, Sigirtmac IC, Ayvali C, Bas CE, Ayhan E, Bilgin SS, Oksuz C. The Use of Relative Motion Flexion Orthoses for Chronic Boutonniere Deformity. J Hand Surg Am. 2024 May;49(5):488.e1-488.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Oct 4. PubMed 36202676 ↗
  • Merritt WH, Jarrell K. A Paradigm Shift in Managing Acute and Chronic Boutonniere Deformity: Anatomic Rationale and Early Clinical Results for the Relative Motion Concept Permitting Immediate Active Motion and Hand Use. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Mar;84(3S Suppl 2):S141-S150. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002307. PubMed 32028337 ↗
  • Johnson C, Swanson M, Manolopoulos K. Treatment of a zone III extensor tendon injury using a single relative motion with dorsal hood orthosis and a modified short arc motion protocol-A case report. J Hand Ther. 2021 Jan-Mar;34(1):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 May 10. PubMed 31080073 ↗
  • Merritt WH, Wong AL, Lalonde DH. Recent Developments Are Changing Extensor Tendon Management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;145(3):617e-628e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006556. PubMed 32097332 ↗
  • Geoghegan L, Wormald JCR, Adami RZ, Rodrigues JN. Central slip extensor tendon injuries: a systematic review of treatments. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 Oct;44(8):825-832. doi: 10.1177/1753193419845311. Epub 2019 May 1. PubMed 31042102 ↗
  • Fox PM, Chang J. Treating the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint in Swan Neck and Boutonniere Deformities. Hand Clin. 2018 May;34(2):167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.12.006. PubMed 29625636 ↗
  • Merritt W. The relative motion concept in acute and chronic boutonniere deformity: Invited commentary. J Hand Ther. 2023 Apr-Jun;36(2):258-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Apr 10. PubMed 37045641 ↗
  • Carl HD, Forst R, Schaller P. Results of primary extensor tendon repair in relation to the zone of injury and pre-operative outcome estimation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Feb;127(2):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-006-0233-3. Epub 2006 Sep 30. PubMed 17013604 ↗
  • van Strien G, van Zwieten KJ. An in-depth look at zone III and IV anatomy of the finger extensor mechanism and some clinical implications for use of the relative motion flexion orthosis. J Hand Ther. 2023 Apr-Jun;36(2):280-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Apr 20. PubMed 37085432 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be publicly shared. De-identified data may be available upon reasonable request and ethical approval.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07921927
Lead sponsor
Lund University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Jun 30, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Ulrika Wijk, PhD
Contact
ulrika.wijk@med.lu.se
+46 40 331744
Elisabeth Brogren, PhD
Contact
+46 40 331185

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion