ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07920705NUTRIGASTUpdated Nov 9, 2026

Nutritional Intervention After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

An interventional study of Oral Nutritional Supplementation (ONS) and Structured Dietary Counseling and Standard Perioperative Care in Gastric Cancer (GC), sponsored by Hanoi Medical University. Completed at 1 site in Vietnam. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Hanoi Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2023, registered Nov 2026).
Updated Nov 9, 2026Interventions changedTitle changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, 1:1 group-matched non-randomized controlled trial evaluates the impact of a structured perioperative nutritional intervention on functional gastrointestinal recovery, post-operative length of hospital stay, anthropometries status, paraclinical test, and multidimensional nutritional-immunological status in gastric cancer patients undergoing elective radical total gastrectomy.

Total gastrectomy induces severe surgical stress, catabolic malnutrition, and rapid loss of body weight and muscle mass, which severely compromises post-operative immune function and clinical recovery. Standard perioperative care often lacks structured, post-discharge immunonutrient supplementation, leaving patients at high risk for prolonged catabolic depletion.

In this study, eligible post-total gastrectomy gastric cancer patients were allocated via 1:1 group matching based on age, sex, AJCC tumor stage, and baseline malnutrition status (GLIM criteria) into two arms (n = 38 per arm):

  1. Nutritional Intervention Group: Received structured perioperative care along with individualized dietary counseling and daily oral nutritional supplementation (ONS; Orgalife 500 mL/day providing 600 kcal, 33 g protein, arginine, glutamine, and omega-3 fatty acids) for 30 consecutive days post-surgery.
  2. Standard Care Control Group: Received standard perioperative surgical care and routine post-gastrectomy dietary advice without structured ONS supplementation.

Primary outcome measures include gastrointestinal recovery metrics (time to first flatus and time to oral feeding initiation) and postoperative length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes comprise multidimensional nutritional-immunological assessments at baseline (T0) and 1 month postoperatively (T1), evaluated by GLIM criteria, Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, body composition, serum albumin, protein levels, anemia, and 30-day postoperative complication rates.

Read the detailed description
  1. Study Background and Rationale Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer is a major gastrointestinal surgical procedure associated with severe postoperative physiological alterations, impaired digestive function, and rapid muscle degradation. Postoperative malnutrition and cancer cachexia severely compromise clinical recovery, increase complication rates, and delay systemic oncological therapies. This trial evaluates a comprehensive, early perioperative medical nutritional intervention protocol aimed at mitigating postoperative weight loss, preserving lean muscle mass, accelerating gastrointestinal recovery, and improving short-term clinical outcomes in gastric cancer patients.
  2. Randomization, Patient Allocation, and Matching A total of 143 adult patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancer indicated for total gastrectomy at Vietnam National Cancer Hospital (Tan Trieu campus) were enrolled. Patients were allocated in a 1:1 ratio into an Intervention Group (n = 38) and a Control Group (n = 38). To minimize allocation bias, patient matching was conducted based on four baseline stratification criteria: Gender: Male, Female, Age Group: 18-40 years, 41-59 years, ≥60 years, Tumor Stage: Stage I, II, III, or IV.

    Baseline Malnutrition Status: Diagnosed according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria (No Malnutrition, Moderate Malnutrition, Severe Malnutrition).

  3. Detailed Intervention Protocols

    Intervention Arm (Active Medical Nutrition Protocol, n = 38):

    Postoperative Days 1-4 (Parenteral Support): Patients received total parenteral nutrition (TPN) providing a target energy intake of 25 kcal/kg/day and a protein intake of 1.0 g/kg/day, comprising balanced parenteral glucose, amino acids, lipid emulsions, essential vitamins, and electrolytes.

    Early Enteral Feeding (Within 24-48 Hours): Enteral nutrition was initiated early (within 24-48 hours postoperatively, prior to the return of bowel flatus) via nasogastric tube (NGT) continuous micro-drip feeding (initial rate: 10 drops/min or 0.5 mL/min, 100 mL per feed) or direct oral intake as tolerated. Tolerance was monitored every 4 hours; feeding proceeded if Gastric Residual Volume (GRV) was \<250 mL.

    Specialized Immunonutrition Formula: Enteral feeds comprised a specialized peptide-hydrolyzed formula combining animal and plant proteins, supplemented with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA/Omega-3 fatty acids) and specific immunonutrients (L-Arginine 3.5 g/250 mL, L-Glutamine 2.5 g/250 mL, and RNA Nucleotides 1.4 g/250 mL). Each 250 mL package provided 300 kcal, 16.5 g protein, 7.8 g fat, and 41.0 g carbohydrates.

    Post-Discharge Nutritional Care (Up to 1 Month): Postoperative nutritional intake targets were maintained at ≥30 kcal/kg/day and ≥1.0 g protein/kg/day divided into 6-8 small meals daily. Patients received weekly structured telephone nutritional counseling and recorded 24-hour dietary intake logs.

    Control Arm (Standard Hospital Care, n = 38):

    Postoperative Days 1-2: Received standard intravenous fluid rehydration (0.9% NaCl, 5% Dextrose) and partial parenteral nutrition.

    Post-Flatus Feeding: Enteral feeding was strictly withheld until the clinical return of bowel flatus. Once flatus returned, oral feeding was initiated sequentially with thin rice water, progressing to soft rice porridge and standard hospital post-surgical diets, without structured immunonutrition supplements or defined individual caloric targets.

  4. Assessment Methodology and Protocol Timeline

Data collection and clinical evaluations were conducted at two main protocol timepoints: Baseline (T0, Preoperative) and 1-Month Postoperative Follow-Up (T1):

Anthropometrics \& Body Composition:

Weight, Height, and BMI: Measured using standardized digital scales and stadiometers.

Body Composition Analysis: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA, Tanita device) was used to measure total body fat percentage and skeletal muscle mass (kg).

Muscle Strength and Reserve: Handgrip strength (HGS, kg) measured via dynamometer and Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC, cm).

Biochemical and Hematological Parameters:

Venous blood samples drawn at baseline and follow-up to analyze serum Albumin (g/L), Total Protein (g/L), Hemoglobin (g/L), Total Lymphocyte Count (TLC, cells/mm³), lipid profiles, and liver/renal function markers.

Gastrointestinal and Clinical Outcomes:

Functional Recovery: Exact time (hours) to first bowel sound, first flatus, and first oral feeding.

Complications \& Hospital Length of Stay: Monitoring for post-surgical GI side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, early satiety, dumping symptoms), infectious complications, and total postoperative hospital stay duration (days)

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Cancer (GC)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • gastric cancer
  • total gastrectomy
  • nutritional intervention
  • immunonutrition
  • Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT)
  • Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI)
  • GLIM
03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

3,399 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 992 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 84 is above the median of 66 across 2,499 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Hanoi Medical University is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 20 years (both male and female).
  • confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma.
  • Scheduled to undergo elective radical total gastrectomy for gastric cancer at National Cancer Hospital (K Hospital).
  • Complete medical records and baseline clinical data available.
  • Provided written to participate in the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing emergency total gastrectomy or non-elective surgical intervention.
  • Undergoing combined multi-organ resections outside standard gastric cancer surgery protocols.
  • Presence of severe concomitant systemic end-organ dysfunction (e.g., severe hepatic failure, renal failure, decompensated heart failure, or acute pancreatitis).
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Severe cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorder, or communication barrier hindering or dietary compliance.
  • Known history of severe allergy or lactose intolerance to ingredients contained in the oral nutritional supplement (dairy/soy protein formulas).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
84 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nutritional Intervention Group

    Participants receive a structured perioperative nutritional care pathway comprising individualized dietary counseling, disease-specific texture-modified diets, and oral nutritional supplementation (ONS; Orgalife, 250 mL/serving, 1 servings providing 300 kcal and 16.5 g protein enriched with L-arginine, L-glutamine, and omega-3) for 30 consecutive days.

    Dietary Supplement: Oral Nutritional Supplementation (ONS) and Structured Dietary Counseling

  • Active comparator
    Standard Care Control Group

    Participants receive standard perioperative surgical care and routine hospital or family-prepared soft diets without structured oral immunonutrition or specialized perioperative dietary counseling.

    Other: Standard Perioperative Care

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementOral Nutritional Supplementation (ONS) and Structured Dietary Counseling

    Participants receive a structured perioperative nutritional care pathway comprising individualized dietary counseling and oral nutritional supplementation (ONS; Orgalife). Patients consume 2 or more servings (250 mL/serving) per day of a specialized hydrolyzed peptide-based formula for 30 consecutive days (starting after surgery 24-48h). A serving provides 300 kcal and 16.5 g protein, enriched with bioactive immunonutrients (1.75 g L-arginine, 1.5 g L-glutamine, 1.4g nucleic acids, and 1.5 g omega-3 fatty acids). The intervention is delivered alongside individualized texture-modified small-frequent meal plans post-gastrectomy.

  • OtherStandard Perioperative Care

    Participants receive standard perioperative surgical care, routine dietary advice, and hospital or family-prepared soft diets without structured oral immunonutrition or specialized perioperative dietary counseling.

    Also known as: standard perioperative surgical care, routine dietary advice

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Body Weight

    Participant body weight measured in kilograms (kg) under fasting conditions using a calibrated body composition balance.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  2. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m²).

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  3. Skeletal Muscle Mass

    Total skeletal muscle mass measured in kilograms (kg) using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA; Tanita body composition analyzer).

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  4. Handgrip Muscle Strength

    Upper-body muscle strength measured in kilograms (kg) using a calibrated digital hand dynamometer.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  5. Time to First Flatus

    Time elapsed from surgical wound closure to the first recorded passage of flatus (bowel movement), measured in hours as a clinical indicator of gastrointestinal motility restoration.

    Time frame: From surgical completion up to 14 days postoperatively (during inpatient stay)

  6. Time to Oral Feeding Initiation

    Time elapsed from completion of surgery to the first successful and tolerated resumption of oral clear liquid feeding, recorded in hours.

    Time frame: From surgical completion up to 14 days postoperatively (during inpatient stay)

  7. Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay

    Total duration of hospitalization, calculated as the number of days elapsed from surgery to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From day of surgery up to discharge (up to 30 days)

  8. Postoperative Complication Rate

    Incidence of surgical and medical post-operative complications (e.g., anastomotic leak, wound infection, pneumonia) recorded within 30 days following total gastrectomy.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC)

    Anthropometric indicator of arm skeletal muscle and subcutaneous fat reserves measured in centimeters (cm) using a non-stretch tape.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  2. Body Fat Percentage

    Proportion of total body mass composed of adipose tissue (%), measured via multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  3. Postoperative Malnutrition Rate Evaluated by GLIM Criteria

    Proportion of participants diagnosed with malnutrition according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) consensus framework, combining phenotypic (weight loss, low BMI) and etiologic criteria (reduced food intake, systemic inflammation).

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  4. Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) Score and Abnormal PNI Rate

    PNI score calculated as: Serum Albumin (g/L) + 5 × Total Lymphocyte Count (10⁹/L). Abnormal PNI rate is defined as the proportion of participants with PNI \< 45.0.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  5. Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and High-Risk Rate

    Derived from serum albumin (g/dL), total cholesterol (mg/dL), and total lymphocyte count (/mm³), ranging from 0 to 12. High-risk CONUT rate is defined as the proportion of participants with a score ≥ 5.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

Other outcomes

  1. Serum Albumin Concentration

    Circulating serum albumin level measured in grams per liter (g/L) or grams per deciliter (g/dL) as a biomarker of visceral protein reserves.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  2. Serum Total Protein Concentration

    Total circulating serum protein level measured in grams per liter (g/L) from venous blood samples.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  3. Total Lymphocyte Count (TLC)

    Absolute peripheral blood lymphocyte count (10⁹/L or cells/mm³) obtained from complete blood count (CBC) to reflect cellular immune status.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

  4. Blood Hemoglobin Concentration

    irculating blood hemoglobin level measured in grams per deciliter (g/dL) as a measure of anemia and red blood cell capacity.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative, T0) and 1 month post-surgery (T1)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hanoi Medical University
    Hanoi, Outside of the US 10000, Vietnam
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the published article (including baseline demographics, clinical recovery metrics, anthropometrics, GLIM, CONUT, PNI scores, and relevant blood laboratory parameters) will be made available upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data will become available starting 6 months following publication of the final study results and will remain accessible for up to 3 years.

Access criteria: Data will be shared with qualified academic researchers upon approval of a formal research proposal to achieve the approved aims and completion of a data transfer agreement. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author at dr.peace2801@gmail.com.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 12 months.

Of 356 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stomach Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 66. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 367 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 63.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 2, 2026
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
StartActual
Apr 21, 2023
Primary completionActual
Apr 21, 2024
CompletionActual
May 21, 2024
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Interventions
Arm changed Intervention Group→Nutritional Intervention Group; Control Group→Standard Care Control Group
Nov 9, 2026
Title
Effectiveness Of Nutritional Intervention on Recovery and Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Total Gastrectomy at Vietnam National Cancer Hospital (NUTRIGAST)→Nutritional Intervention After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Nov 9, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Interventions Arm changed Intervention Group→Nutritional Intervention Group; Control Group→Standard Care Control Group
    Title Effectiveness Of Nutritional Intervention on Recovery and Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Total Gastrectomy at Vietnam National Cancer Hospital (NUTRIGAST)→Nutritional Intervention After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    + 4 other changes: verification date, responsible party, description and contact details
  2. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07920705
Lead sponsor
Hanoi Medical University
Responsible party
Nguyen Thi Thanh Hoa (Principal Investigator, Hanoi Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Apr 21, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 21, 2024
Completion
May 21, 2024
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Hoa TT Nguyen
principal investigator · Hanoi Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion