ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07891715Updated Oct 23, 2026

Biliary Plus Pancreatic Stent vs Pancreatic Stent Alone After Endoscopic Papillectomy

An interventional study of Endoscopic papillectomy with pancreatic duct stent placement and Endoscopic papillectomy with pancreatic duct and biliary stent placement in Post-Procedural Complications, sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
190
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of biliary stent placement combined with pancreatic stent placement versus pancreatic stent alone in patients undergoing endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for duodenal ampullary adenoma. The primary objective is to compare the overall incidence of post-procedural complications between the two groups. A total of 190 patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive either pancreatic stent alone (PS group) or combined biliary and pancreatic stents (PBS group).

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial comparing prophylactic biliary plus pancreatic duct stenting versus pancreatic duct stenting alone after endoscopic papillectomy for duodenal ampillary adenoma or early ampullary carcinoma (less than or equal to T1a). Patients are randomized 1:1. In both groups a pancreatic duct stent is placed at the end of the procedure; the experimental group additionally receives a biliary duct stent. Patients are followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initial treatment and annually thereafter for at least 5 years, with side-viewing duodenoscopy, targeted biopsy of the scar and of any abnormal area.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-Procedural Complications

Keywords

  • endoscopic papillectomy
  • biliary stent
  • pancreatic stent
  • randomized controlled trial
  • Ampullary adenoma
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University is the lead sponsor of 305 studies on the registry; 184 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years.
  2. Patients with histologically confirmed duodenal papillary adenoma or early-stage adenocarcinoma (≤T1a)
  3. Scheduled to undergo endoscopic papillectomy (EP).
  4. Patients confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or Intraductal ultrasound (IDUS )indicating no intraductal extension into the pancreatic or bile duct.
  5. Patients who provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications to endoscopic procedures (e.g., severe esophageal stricture, inability to tolerate sedation).
  2. Ectopic duodenal papilla or congenital pancreaticobiliary developmental anomalies (e.g., pancreaticobiliary maljunction, pancreas divisum) .
  3. Pregnant or lactating women.
  4. Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 50,000/μL), or inability to withhold antithrombotic (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) therapy for the planned endoscopic procedure.
  5. Major upper abdominal surgery or previous biliary surgery history.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
190 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pancreatic stent group

    Patients undergoing EP followed by pancreatic duct stent placement only.

    Procedure: Endoscopic papillectomy with pancreatic duct stent placement

  • Experimental
    Combined Biliary and Pancreatic Stent

    Patients undergoing EP followed by pancreatic duct and biliary stent placement.

    Procedure: Endoscopic papillectomy with pancreatic duct and biliary stent placement

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic papillectomy with pancreatic duct stent placement

    Patients undergo standard EP for duodenal ampullary adenoma. A pancreatic duct stent is placed at the end of the procedure; no biliary stent is placed.

  • ProcedureEndoscopic papillectomy with pancreatic duct and biliary stent placement

    Patients undergo standard EP for duodenal ampullary adenoma. Both prophylactic pancreatic duct and biliary stents are placed at the end of the procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall incidence of post-procedural complications

    The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who develop at least one post-procedural complication (including bleeding, pancreatitis, cholangitis, and perforation) within 30 days after EP . Complications will be graded according to established criteria.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after the initial treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of post-procedural pancreatitis

    Post-procedural pancreatitis is defined as meeting at least two of the following three criteria: (1) abdominal pain characteristic of acute pancreatitis; (2) serum amylase or lipase \>3 times the upper limit of normal; (3) characteristic imaging findings of pancreatitis on CT or ultrasound. Severity will be classified as mild (interstitial edematous pancreatitis without organ failure or necrosis), moderate (transient organ failure ≤48h and/or local complications), or severe (persistent organ failure \>48h and/or death) per the revised Atlanta classification.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after the initial treatment

  2. Incidence of post-procedural bleeding

    Post-procedural bleeding is defined as any of the following after achieving primary hemostasis: (1) overt bleeding symptoms (hematemesis, melena, hematochezia, or blood aspirated via nasogastric tube); (2) hemodynamic instability due to bleeding; (3) hemoglobin drop \>2 g/dL; (4) direct endoscopic evidence of bleeding from the papillectomy site.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after the initial treatment

  3. Incidence of post-procedural perforation

    Post-procedural perforation is defined as evidence of transmural defect detected by emergency endoscopy, or radiological evidence of free air in the retroperitoneum or peritoneal cavity on CT scan.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after the initial treatment

  4. Incidence of post-procedural cholangitis

    New onset temperature \>38 °C for more than 24 hours combined with cholestasis. Severity will be graded separately according to the TG18 severity classification (Grade I / II / III) and reported descriptively.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after the initial treatment

  5. Incidence of biliary stricture

    EP-related biliary stricture diagnosed by CT, EUS, or MRCP during follow-up, defined as focal narrowing of the common bile duct with or without proximal dilation.

    Time frame: Within 12 months after the initial treatment

  6. Incidence of transient adverse events (TAEs)

    Transient adverse events are temporary, reversible procedure-related injuries that do not require medical intervention and do not prolong hospital stay. Includes fever, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and hyperamylasemia (elevated amylase not meeting pancreatitis criteria).

    Time frame: Within 7 days after the initial treatment

  7. Recurrence rate

    Recurrence is defined as histologically confirmed ampullary adenoma growth at follow-up endoscopy more than 3 months after initial treatment.

    Time frame: At 12 months after the initial treatment

  8. Residual rates

    Residual is defined as histologically confirmed adenoma growth within 3 months after initial treatment.

    Time frame: Within 3 monthsafter the initial treatment

  9. Length of hospital stay

    Total number of calendar days spent in hospital from the date of admission for the initial treatment through 12 months after the initial treatment, including the index hospitalization and all readmissions due to disease-related symptoms or treatment-related events.

    Time frame: Within 12 months after the initial treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
    Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. No abstract available. PubMed 20189503 ↗
  • Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Gabata T, Hata J, Liau KH, Miura F, Horiguchi A, Liu KH, Su CH, Wada K, Jagannath P, Itoi T, Gouma DJ, Mori Y, Mukai S, Gimenez ME, Huang WS, Kim MH, Okamoto K, Belli G, Dervenis C, Chan ACW, Lau WY, Endo I, Gomi H, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Baron TH, de Santibanes E, Teoh AYB, Hwang TL, Ker CG, Chen MF, Han HS, Yoon YS, Choi IS, Yoon DS, Higuchi R, Kitano S, Inomata M, Deziel DJ, Jonas E, Hirata K, Sumiyama Y, Inui K, Yamamoto M. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):17-30. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.512. Epub 2018 Jan 5. PubMed 29032610 ↗
  • Espinel J, Pinedo E, Ojeda V, Guerra Del Rio M. Endoscopic ampullectomy: a technical review. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016 May;108(5):271-8. doi: 10.17235/reed.2016.3867/2015. PubMed 27187501 ↗
  • Li S, Wang Z, Cai F, Linghu E, Sun G, Wang X, Meng J, Du H, Yang Y, Li W. New experience of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasms. Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):612-619. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6577-2. Epub 2018 Nov 12. PubMed 30421083 ↗
  • Kang SH, Kim KH, Kim TN, Jung MK, Cho CM, Cho KB, Han JM, Kim HG, Kim HS. Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasms: retrospective analysis of a multicenter study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 May 30;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0626-5. PubMed 28558658 ↗
  • Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Obana T, Horaguchi J, Koshita S, Kanno Y, Ogawa T, Kato Y, Yamashita Y. Impact of technical modification of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm on the occurrence of complications. Dig Endosc. 2012 Jan;24(1):30-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01161.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1. PubMed 22211409 ↗
  • Ru N, Chai N, Zhang B, Li L, Bi Y, Linghu E. Impact of pancreatic and biliary stent on post-endoscopic papillectomy complications: A single-center retrospective study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Sep 5;137(17):2111-2118. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002893. Epub 2024 May 27. PubMed 38809090 ↗
  • Jiang L, Ling-Hu EQ, Chai NL, Li W, Cai FC, Li MY, Guo X, Meng JY, Wang XD, Tang P, Zhu J, Du H, Wang HB. Novel endoscopic papillectomy for reducing postoperative adverse events (with videos). World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 28;26(40):6250-6259. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6250. PubMed 33177797 ↗
  • Fritzsche JA, Fockens P, Barthet M, Bruno MJ, Carr-Locke DL, Costamagna G, Cote GA, Deprez PH, Giovannini M, Haber GB, Hawes RH, Hyun JJ, Itoi T, Iwasaki E, Kylanpaa L, Neuhaus H, Park JY, Reddy DN, Sakai A, Bourke MJ, Voermans RP. Expert consensus on endoscopic papillectomy using a Delphi process. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct;94(4):760-773.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 19. PubMed 33887269 ↗
  • Vanbiervliet G, Strijker M, Arvanitakis M, Aelvoet A, Arnelo U, Beyna T, Busch O, Deprez PH, Kunovsky L, Larghi A, Manes G, Moss A, Napoleon B, Nayar M, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Seewald S, Barthet M, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2021 Apr;53(4):429-448. doi: 10.1055/a-1397-3198. Epub 2021 Mar 16. PubMed 33728632 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Apr 2028, 18 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 18, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 20, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 20, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 20, 2029
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07891715
Collaborators
Beijing Friendship Hospital, LanZhou University, Shandong First Medical University, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 20, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Zhen Li, MD
Contact
qilulizhen@sdu.edu.cn
18560086106
Ning Zhong, MD
Contact
zhongning@email.sdu.edu.cn
18560086096
Zhen Li
principal investigator · Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion