ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07914374Updated Nov 3, 2026

Video- and Game-Based Interventions During Pediatric Peripheral Venous Catheterization

An interventional study of Researcher-Developed Educational Video and Developed Educational Card Game in Peripheral Venous Catheterization, sponsored by Selcuk University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 5 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Selcuk University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2026, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effects of video- and card game-based interventions administered to children during peripheral venous catheter placement on their physiological parameters, pain, anxiety, and fear of materials used in hospitals. The study was conducted between February 2026 and May 2026 in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Selçuk University. A total of 120 children aged 5-10 years were included. We divided the children into three groups: video, card game, and control. Children in the video group received a video-based intervention before the procedure, while those in the card game group received a card game-based intervention. The control group received routine care. Data were collected using the Information Form, Physiological Parameters Assessment Form, Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the scale measuring children's fear of nursing interventions and instruments used in hospitals.

Read the detailed description

Peripheral venous catheter placement is an invasive nursing procedure that may cause adverse responses in children, including pain, fear, and anxiety. Providing children with information before the procedure and supporting them with developmentally appropriate methods may help reduce these responses. Video- and game-based interventions are non-pharmacological approaches that can distract children during the procedure and support their cooperation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of video- and card game-based interventions administered to children during peripheral venous catheter placement on their physiological parameters, pain, anxiety, and fear of materials used in hospitals. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with three parallel groups and was conducted between February 2026 and May 2026 in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Selçuk University. A total of 120 children aged 5-10 years were included. The children were assigned to a video group, a card game group, or a control group. Children in the video group received a video-based intervention before peripheral venous catheter placement, while children in the card game group received a card game-based intervention. The control group received routine care without any additional intervention. Physiological parameters were assessed in terms of pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate. The data collection instruments included the Information Form, Physiological Parameters Assessment Form, Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the scale measuring children's fear of nursing interventions and instruments used in hospitals. Data were analyzed using measurements obtained before and after the procedure. Statistical significance was set at p\<0.05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Venous Catheterization

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Anxiety
  • Child Fear
  • Peripheral venous catheterization
  • Game
  • Video
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Selcuk University is the lead sponsor of 258 studies on the registry; 67 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 5-10 years.
  • Children undergoing peripheral venous catheter placement in the pediatric emergency department.
  • Children whose parents or legal guardians provide for participation in the study.
  • Children who meet the study requirements and agree to participate in accordance with the approved consent procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who received sedative or narcotic medication within the previous 24 hours.
  • Children who received analgesic medication within the previous 6 hours.
  • Children with sensory impairment in the limb intended for peripheral venous catheter placement or a cast on that limb.
  • Children with significant medical or psychiatric conditions that may affect the study assessments, including needle phobia or a history of fainting during blood collection.
  • Children with visual or hearing impairments that prevent participation in the interventions.

Children who exhibit reactions to the images or sounds used in the interventions that prevent participation.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Video Group

    The researcher developed an educational video using Canva that lasted approximately 3.5 minutes. It consisted of four sections: an introduction to the nurse, the emergency department, medical materials, and the peripheral venous catheterization procedure. Three academic experts in pediatric nursing reviewed the video, and the final version was revised based on their feedback. The video was administered to children before peripheral venous catheter placement

    Other: Researcher-Developed Educational Video

  • Experimental
    Card Game Group

    The researcher-developed educational card game consisted of cards with laminated outer surfaces, stored in a cardboard box. The game included four sections: introduction of the nurse, the emergency department, medical materials, and the peripheral venous catheterization procedure. In each section, the researcher first introduced the cards, then asked the child questions about the person or material shown. For the medical materials, the researcher asked the child about their purpose. In the final section, the researcher used cards illustrating peripheral venous catheterization to explain the procedure and materials in age-appropriate language. The child was then asked questions about the procedural steps and materials used. Three academic experts in pediatric nursing reviewed the game, and the final version was revised based on their feedback. The intervention was administered before peripheral venous catheter placement.

    Other: Developed Educational Card Game

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Children in the control group received routine care during peripheral venous catheter placement without the additional educational video or card game intervention.

Interventions

  • OtherResearcher-Developed Educational Video

    The researcher-developed educational video was created using Canva and lasted approximately 3.5 minutes. It consisted of four sections introducing the nurse, the emergency department, medical materials, and the peripheral venous catheterization procedure. The video was reviewed by three academic experts in pediatric nursing, and the final version was prepared based on their feedback. The video was administered to children before peripheral venous catheter placement.

  • OtherDeveloped Educational Card Game

    The researcher-developed educational card game consisted of cards with laminated outer surfaces, stored in a cardboard box. The game included four sections: introduction of the nurse, the emergency department, medical materials, and the peripheral venous catheterization procedure. During each section, the researcher first introduced the cards and then asked the child questions about the person or material shown. For the medical materials, the child was asked about their purpose. In the final section, cards illustrating peripheral venous catheterization were used to explain the procedure and the materials involved in age-appropriate language. The child was then asked questions about the procedural steps and materials used. The game was reviewed by three academic experts in pediatric nursing, and the final version was prepared based on their feedback. The intervention was administered before peripheral venous catheter placement.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Physiological Parameters During Peripheral Venous Catheter Placement: Heart Rate

    Children's heart rates were assessed using the Physiological Parameters Assessment Form. Measurements were compared among the video group, card game group, and control group to evaluate the effects of the interventions on physiological parameters during peripheral venous catheter placement.

    Time frame: Before the randomized allocation of groups and three minutes after peripheral venous catheter placement

  2. Physiological Parameters During Peripheral Venous Catheter Placement: Respiratory rate

    Children's respiratory rate was assessed using the Physiological Parameters Assessment Form. Measurements were compared among the video group, card game group, and control group to evaluate the effects of the interventions on physiological parameters during peripheral venous catheter placement.

    Time frame: Before the randomized allocation of groups and three minutes after peripheral venous catheter placement

  3. Physiological Parameters During Peripheral Venous Catheter Placement: Oxygen saturation

    Children's oxygen saturation was assessed using the Physiological Parameters Assessment Form. Measurements were compared among the video group, card game group, and control group to evaluate the effects of the interventions on physiological parameters during peripheral venous catheter placement.

    Time frame: Before the randomized allocation of groups and three minutes after peripheral venous catheter placement

  4. Procedural Pain During Peripheral Venous Catheter Placement

    Children's procedural pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale. The scale is completed by the child and includes five different facial expressions, each with a score between 0 and 10. An increase in the score indicates an increase in the child's pain level. Pain scores were compared among the video group, card game group, and control group to evaluate the effects of video- and card game-based interventions on pain during peripheral venous catheter placement.

    Time frame: Before the randomized allocation of groups and three minutes after peripheral venous catheter placement

  5. Anxiety During Peripheral Venous Catheter Placement

    Children's anxiety levels were assessed using the anxiety assessment instrument specified in the study protocol. The scale uses phrases like, "Imagine all your anxious or nervous feelings are at the bottom of the thermometer," "If you're a little anxious or tense, the feelings might go a little higher on the thermometer," and "If you're very, very anxious or tense, the feelings might go all the way to the top." The child is asked to draw a line on the thermometer to indicate how anxious they are "right now." The scale is scored on a scale of 0-10, with an increasing score indicating increased anxiety. Anxiety scores were compared among the video group, card game group, and control group to evaluate the effects of the interventions on children's anxiety levels.

    Time frame: Before the randomized allocation of groups and three minutes after peripheral venous catheter placement

  6. Fear of Nursing Interventions and Materials Used in Hospitals

    Children's fear of nursing interventions and materials used in hospitals was assessed using the scale for measuring children's fear of nursing interventions and instruments used in hospitals. The scale consists of 18 items, a five-point Likert scale, and two sub-dimensions; the items include images of the materials used. The sub-dimension of fear towards frequently encountered materials includes items 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, while the sub-dimension of fear towards infrequently encountered materials includes items 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 17, and 18. In scoring the scale, the child is expected to respond to the image in the relevant item with one of the following options: "(1) I am not afraid, (2) I am slightly afraid, (3) I am afraid, (4) I am very afraid, (5) I am extremely afraid." The scale has no cutoff point, and as tFear scores were compared among the video group, card game group, and control group to evaluate the effects of the interventions on children's fear levels.

    Time frame: Before the randomized allocation of groups and three minutes after peripheral venous catheter placement

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Selçuk University
    Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Birnie KA, Noel M, Parker JA, Chambers CT, Uman LS, Kisely SR, McGrath PJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needle-related pain and distress in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Sep;39(8):783-808. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu029. Epub 2014 Jun 2. PubMed 24891439 ↗
  • Bice AA, Gunther M, Wyatt T. Increasing nursing treatment for pediatric procedural pain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):365-79. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 18. PubMed 24602440 ↗
  • Uysal DA, Polat OG, Ugucu G, Karakul A, Olcay AZ, Tuzun O, Yigit R. A comparison of watching cartoons versus playing games as a distraction method on pain and fear of pain during peripheral intravenous cannula placement in children aged 6-9 years: A randomized experimental study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2025 Jan-Feb;80:161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.11.023. Epub 2024 Nov 30. PubMed 39616818 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07914374
Lead sponsor
Selcuk University
Responsible party
Sevil Özkan (Assistant Prof (PhD), Selcuk University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2026
Completion
May 31, 2026
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion