ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07913711Updated Nov 6, 2026

Impact of Lepteridine™ Mānuka Honey in Adults With Gastrointestinal Discomfort

An interventional study of Mānuka Honey Active Product 1 and Mānuka Honey Active Product 2 in Upper Gastrointestinal Discomfort, sponsored by Radicle Science. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 105 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Radicle Science · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Updated Nov 6, 2026Title changedNewly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
775
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 105 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Impact of Lepteridine™ Mānuka honey in adults with gastrointestinal discomfort: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted with adult participants, residing in the United States.

Eligible participants will (1) experience pain or burning in their upper abdomen at least once a week, (2) experience mild to severe discomfort in their upper abdomen, (3) experiencing vomiting less than once per week due to GI discomfort, (4) reports no physical cause for GI symptoms, and (5) express acceptance in taking a product and not knowing its formulation until the end of the study.

Participants that report a known contraindication or with well-established, significant safety concerns due to illness will be excluded. Heavy drinkers and those who report they are pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breastfeeding will be excluded. Participants that report taking medications with a known contraindication or with well-established, significant safety concerns will be excluded.

Self-reported data are collected electronically from eligible participants for 9 weeks. Participant reports of health indicators will be collected at enrollment and throughout the active period of study product usage. All study assessments will be electronic; there are no in-person visits or assessments for this real-world evidence study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Upper Gastrointestinal Discomfort
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Radicle Science is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 105 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults, at least 21 years of age at the time of electronic consent, inclusive of all ethnicities, races, and gender identities

    • Assigned sex at birth will determine sex-specific recruitment and PROs (male vs female) employed, when needed
  • Resides in the United States
  • Reports experiencing pain or burning in their upper abdomen at least once a week
  • Reports experiencing mild to severe discomfort in their upper abdomen
  • Reports no physical cause for their GI symptoms
  • Expresses a willingness to take a study product and not know the product identity (active or placebo) until the end of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Report being pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breastfeeding
  • Unable to provide a valid US shipping address and mobile phone number
  • Reports current enrollment in another clinical trial
  • Reports being a heavy drinker (defined as drinking 3 or more alcoholic beverages per day)
  • Unable to read and understand English at a 7th grade level
  • Reports a current and/or recent (up to 3 months ago) major illness and/or surgery that poses a known, significant safety risk
  • Reports a diagnosis of cardiac dysfunction, liver or kidney disease that presents a known and/or a significant safety risk with any of the study product ingredients. This may include:

    • Class III or IV congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, uncontrolled arrhythmias, cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, stage 3b or 4 chronic kidney disease, or kidney failure
  • Reports taking medications that have a well-established moderate or severe interaction, posing a substantial safety risk with any of the study product ingredients. This may include:

    • Anticoagulants, antihypertensives, anxiolytics, antidepressants, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, sedative hypnotics, seizure medications, medications that warn against grapefruit consumption, at doses greater than 5 mg per day, diabetic medications, oral anti-infectives (antibiotics, antifungals, antivirals) to treat an acute infection, antipsychotics, MAOIs, Proton Pump Inhibitors, or thyroid products
  • Reports vomiting once per week or more due to GI discomfort
  • Reports taking antibiotics within the month before starting the study
  • Reports current use of the primary ingredient(s) and/or similar product(s) to the active study product(s) that may limit the effects of the study products and/or pose a safety risk
  • Medical history of upper GI surgery or other diagnosed significant disorders (inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, coeliac disease, Crohn's disease)
  • Lack of reliable daily access to the internet Biomarker collection note: participants residing in New York, New Jersey, or Rhode Island may enroll in the main study but are not eligible for the optional biospecimen collection.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
775 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Product 1

    Mānuka Honey Active Product 1

    Other: Mānuka Honey Active Product 1

  • Experimental
    Active Product 2

    Mānuka Honey Active Product 2

    Other: Mānuka Honey Active Product 2

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Control

    Placebo Control

    Other: Placebo Control

Interventions

  • OtherMānuka Honey Active Product 1

    Participants will use their Mānuka Honey Active Product 1 as directed for a period of 6 weeks.

  • OtherMānuka Honey Active Product 2

    Participants will use their Mānuka Honey Active Product 2 as directed for a period of 6 weeks.

  • OtherPlacebo Control

    Participants will use their Placebo Control as directed for a period of 6 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in upper GI discomfort symptoms

    Baseline-adjusted difference between each active treatment group and placebo at Week 6 in upper GI discomfort symptom scores, as assessed by the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI) symptom checklist (scale 0-195; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms).

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  2. Change in upper GI discomfort related quality of life

    Baseline-adjusted difference between each active treatment group and placebo at Week 6 in upper GI discomfort-related quality of life, as assessed by the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI) quality of life subscale (scale 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

Other outcomes

  1. Minimal clinical importance difference (MCID) in upper GI discomfort symptoms

    Likelihood of achieving an MCID in upper GI discomfort symptoms, as measured by the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI) symptom checklist (scale 0- 195; higher scores = more severe symptoms)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  2. Minimal clinical importance difference (MCID) in upper GI discomfort related quality of life

    Likelihood of achieving an MCID in upper GI discomfort related quality of life, as measured by the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI) quality of life subscale (scale 0-100; higher scores = better quality of life)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  3. Side effect profile

    Number, type, severity, causality, and outcome of side effects (adverse events/unanticipated problems) for each study arm and for the overall study

    Time frame: 8 weeks of study assessments

  4. Change in Belly Pain

    Between-group differences in outcome scores over the assessment period in belly pain score as assessed by PROMIS Belly Pain 5A (scale 2-25; where the higher scores correspond to worse belly pain)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  5. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in Belly Pain

    Likelihood of experiencing minimal clinically important difference in belly pain as assessed by PROMIS Belly Pain 5A (scale 2-25; where the higher scores correspond to worse belly pain)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  6. Change in Gas and Bloating

    Between-group differences in outcome scores over the assessment period in gas and bloating score as assessed by PROMIS Gas and Bloating 13A (scale 3-59; where the higher scores correspond to worse gas and bloating)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  7. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in Gas and Bloating

    Likelihood of experiencing minimal clinically important difference in gas and bloating, as measured by PROMIS Gas and Bloating 13A (scale 3-59; where the higher scores correspond to worse gas and bloating)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  8. Change in Constipation

    Between-group differences in outcome scores over the assessment period in constipation score as assessed by PROMIS Constipation 9A (scale 5-45; where the higher scores correspond to worse constipation)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  9. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in Constipation

    Likelihood of experiencing minimal clinically important difference in constipation, as measured by PROMIS Constipation 9A (scale 5-45; where the higher scores correspond to worse constipation)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  10. Change in Reflux

    Between-group differences in outcome scores over the assessment period in reflux score as assessed by PROMIS Gastrointestinal Gastroesophageal Reflux 13A (scale 8-64; with higher scores corresponding to more severe reflux)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  11. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in reflux

    Likelihood of experiencing minimal clinically important difference in reflux as assessed by PROMIS Gastrointestinal Gastroesophageal Reflux 13A (scale 8-64; with higher scores corresponding to more severe reflux)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  12. Change in mental wellbeing

    Between-group differences in outcome scores over the assessment period in mental wellbeing score as assessed by World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index (scale 0- 25; where the higher scores correspond to better mental wellbeing)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  13. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in mental wellbeing

    Likelihood of experiencing minimal clinically important difference in mental wellbeing, as measured by World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (scale 0-25; where the higher scores correspond to better mental wellbeing)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  14. Change in feelings of anxiety

    Between-group differences in outcome scores over the assessment period as assessed by PROMIS Anxiety 4A (scale 4-20; with higher scores corresponding to more severe anxiety)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  15. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in feelings of anxiety

    Likelihood of experiencing minimal clinically important difference as assessed by PROMIS Anxiety 4A (scale 4- 20; with higher scores corresponding to more severe anxiety)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  16. Change in mood (emotional distress-depression)

    Between-group differences in outcome scores over the assessment period in emotional distress score as assessed by PROMIS Emotional Distress-Depression 4A (scale 4-20; with higher scores corresponding to greater levels of emotional distress)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  17. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in mood (emotional distress-depression)

    Likelihood of experiencing minimal clinically important difference in mood score as assessed by PROMIS Emotional Distress-Depression 4A (scale 4-20; with higher scores corresponding to greater levels of emotional distress)

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  18. Overall treatment effect regarding GI symptoms

    Participant-rated overall treatment effect (OTE) on GI symptoms, reported weekly during the study period

    Time frame: Baseline + 8 weeks of study assessments

  19. Rome IV functional GI disorder profile

    Baseline functional gastrointestinal disorder characteristics as assessed by the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire (R4DQ); administered at baseline only, used to characterize participants

    Time frame: Baseline

  20. Change in at-home (direct-to-consumer) specimen assays

    Between-group differences in changes in specimen assay results from baseline to the end of study product usage (Week 6), among participants who consented to optional biospecimen collection.

    Time frame: Baseline + Week 6

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will not be shared with researchers outside of Radicle Collaborators on this study.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Title
Impact of Lepteridine™ Mānuka Honey in Adults With Gastrointestinal Discomfort: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Nov 6, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Title Impact of Lepteridine™ Mānuka Honey in Adults With Gastrointestinal Discomfort: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
  2. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07913711
Lead sponsor
Radicle Science
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Oct 28, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 28, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Study Manager
Contact
studymgmt@radiclescience.com
858-779-0086
Susan Hewlings
Contact
susan.hewlings@radiclescience.com
760-281-3898
Susan Hewlings
principal investigator · Radicle Science

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion