ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07913022Updated Nov 3, 2026

Early Healing of Apical Periodontitis After Root Canal Treatment With Bioceramic and Calcium Hydroxide Medicaments: Evaluation Using PAI and ImageJ

An interventional study of Bioceramic Intracanal Medicament and Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal Medication in Apical Periodontitis, Root Canal Treatment and Intracanal Medicaments, sponsored by Hasanuddin University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Hasanuddin University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2026, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate and compare early radiographic healing of apical periodontitis following root canal treatment using bioceramic and calcium hydroxide intracanal medicaments.

Participants with apical periodontitis who meet the eligibility criteria will be assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first group will receive a bioceramic intracanal medicament (Bio-C Temp, Angelus), while the second group will receive calcium hydroxide (Ultracal, Ultradent). The assigned medicament will be placed inside the root canal for two weeks as part of the root canal treatment procedure.

Periapical dental radiographs will be obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up using the paralleling technique. Radiographic images will be evaluated to assess changes in periapical healing over time.

Periapical healing will be assessed using the Periapical Index (PAI) and quantitative image analysis with ImageJ software. The PAI will be used to evaluate the radiographic status of the periapical tissues. ImageJ will be used to measure the area and density of periapical lesions and their fractal dimension on periapical radiographs.

The findings from the baseline and three-month follow-up assessments will be compared to evaluate changes in periapical lesions and to compare early radiographic healing between the bioceramic and calcium hydroxide groups.

The study is expected to provide information on the effectiveness of bioceramic and calcium hydroxide intracanal medicaments in promoting early radiographic healing of apical periodontitis following root canal treatment.

Read the detailed description

Apical periodontitis is an inflammatory condition affecting the periapical tissues and is commonly associated with microbial infection of the root canal system. Root canal treatment aims to control infection and promote healing of the periapical tissues. However, the extent and rate of radiographic healing may vary depending on the initial periapical condition and the effectiveness of endodontic treatment.

Intracanal medicaments are used during root canal treatment to help control residual microorganisms between treatment appointments. Calcium hydroxide is widely used because of its high alkalinity and antimicrobial properties. Bioceramic-based intracanal medicaments represent an alternative material in endodontic treatment. Comparing these medicaments may provide information regarding their effectiveness in promoting early radiographic healing of apical periodontitis.

This randomized controlled clinical study will evaluate and compare early radiographic healing of apical periodontitis following root canal treatment using bioceramic and calcium hydroxide intracanal medicaments. The study will be conducted at the Dental and Oral Hospital of Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia. A total of 24 participants who meet the predefined eligibility criteria are planned for inclusion, with 12 participants in the bioceramic group and 12 participants in the calcium hydroxide group.

Eligible participants will undergo root canal treatment and receive the intracanal medicament assigned to their treatment group. The bioceramic group will receive Bio-C Temp (Angelus), while the calcium hydroxide group will receive Ultracal (Ultradent). The assigned medicament will be placed inside the root canal for two weeks as part of the treatment protocol.

Periapical dental radiographs will be obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up using the paralleling technique. The radiographic images will be assessed to evaluate changes in periapical lesions over the follow-up period. The three-month follow-up assessments are planned to be completed by December 2026.

Radiographic evaluation will include the Periapical Index (PAI) and quantitative image analysis using ImageJ software. The PAI will be used to assess the radiographic status of the periapical tissues. ImageJ will be used to measure periapical lesion area, lesion density, and fractal dimension on the periapical radiographs. These measurements will be compared between baseline and the three-month follow-up to characterize radiographic changes associated with early periapical healing.

The primary outcome will be the change in radiographic indicators of periapical healing from baseline to the three-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include changes in PAI scores, periapical lesion area, lesion density, and fractal dimension, as well as comparisons of these changes between the bioceramic and calcium hydroxide groups.

This study is expected to provide comparative clinical information regarding early radiographic healing following the use of bioceramic and calcium hydroxide intracanal medicaments. The findings may also contribute to the evaluation of PAI and quantitative ImageJ analysis as methods for monitoring radiographic changes in periapical lesions after root canal treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Apical Periodontitis
  • Root Canal Treatment
  • Intracanal Medicaments

Keywords

  • Apical periodontitis
  • Periapical Healing
  • Bioceramic Intracanal Medicament
  • Calcium Hydroxide
  • Periapical Index (PAI)
  • ImageJ
  • Periapical Lesion Area
  • Lesion Density
  • Fractal Dimension
03

In context

Periapical Periodontitis

280 studies on the registry are indexed under Periapical Periodontitis; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 60 across 245 interventional studies indexed under Periapical Periodontitis.

Browse Periapical Periodontitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hasanuddin University is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults who are physically and mentally healthy and aged 18 years or older.
  2. Cooperative patients who are willing to attend the three-month follow-up after root canal treatment.
  3. Permanent mature anterior maxillary teeth diagnosed with apical periodontitis, based on patient history, intraoral clinical examination, negative pulp vitality test, negative palpation test, percussion testing, and a Periapical Index (PAI) score of 3 or higher on radiographic examination.
  4. Teeth with hermetic root canal obturation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Teeth with advanced mobility.
  2. Teeth with periodontal pockets greater than 4 mm.
  3. Teeth that have previously undergone root canal treatment.
  4. Teeth with root fractures or fractures occurring during root canal treatment.
  5. Teeth with internal or external resorption.
  6. Teeth with open apices.
  7. Teeth with calcified or obliterated root canals.
  8. Female patients who are pregnant during the follow-up period.
  9. Patients with systemic conditions requiring antibiotic prophylaxis for routine dental treatment or with systemic diseases that preclude participation.
  10. Patients unwilling to attend the three-month follow-up after root canal treatment.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bioceramic Intracanal Medicament

    Participants in this group will receive a bioceramic intracanal medicament (Bio-C Temp, Angelus) as part of root canal treatment. The medicament will be placed inside the root canal for two weeks. Periapical radiographs will be obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up using the paralleling technique to evaluate periapical healing.

    Drug: Bioceramic Intracanal Medicament

  • Active comparator
    Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal Medicament

    Participants in this group will receive a calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament (Ultracal, Ultradent) as part of root canal treatment. The medicament will be placed inside the root canal for two weeks. Periapical radiographs will be obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up using the paralleling technique to evaluate periapical healing.

    Drug: Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal Medication

Interventions

  • DrugBioceramic Intracanal Medicament

    Bio-C Temp (Angelus) will be placed inside the root canal for two weeks as part of root canal treatment. Periapical dental radiographs will be obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up using the paralleling technique. Periapical healing will be evaluated using the Periapical Index (PAI) and ImageJ analysis to measure lesion area, lesion density, and fractal dimension.

    Also known as: BioCtemp

  • Ultracal XS (Ultradent) will be placed inside the root canal for two weeks as part of root canal treatment. Periapical dental radiographs will be obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up using the paralleling technique. Periapical healing will be evaluated using the Periapical Index (PAI) and ImageJ analysis to measure lesion area, lesion density, and fractal dimension.

    Also known as: Ultracal XS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Periapical Index (PAI) Score From Baseline to 3-Month Follow-up

    Changes in Periapical Index (PAI) scores will be assessed by comparing periapical dental radiographs obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up. Radiographs will be evaluated by a blinded outcomes assessor. Changes in PAI scores will be compared between the bioceramic and calcium hydroxide groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after treatment

  2. Change in Periapical Lesion Area From Baseline to 3-Month Follow-up

    Changes in periapical lesion area will be measured using ImageJ software on periapical dental radiographs obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up. Radiographs will be obtained using the paralleling technique and evaluated by a blinded outcomes assessor. Changes in lesion area will be compared between the bioceramic and calcium hydroxide groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after treatment

  3. Change in Periapical Lesion Density From Baseline to 3-Month Follow-up

    Changes in periapical lesion density will be assessed quantitatively using ImageJ software on periapical dental radiographs obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up. Radiographs will be evaluated by a blinded outcomes assessor, and changes will be compared between the bioceramic and calcium hydroxide groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after treatment

  4. Change in Periapical Lesion Fractal Dimension From Baseline to 3-Month Follow-up

    Changes in the fractal dimension of periapical lesions will be measured using ImageJ-based image analysis on periapical dental radiographs obtained at baseline and at the three-month follow-up. Radiographs will be evaluated by a blinded outcomes assessor, and changes will be compared between the bioceramic and calcium hydroxide groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dental and Oral Hospital of Hasanuddin University
    Makassar, South Sulawesi 90154, Indonesia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. The data contain confidential clinical and radiographic information, and sharing is not planned under the current study protocol. Only aggregate results will be reported in publications.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 6 months after the start.

Of 171 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Periapical Periodontitis, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 19. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 172 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 19.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 28, 2026
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
StartActual
Jun 12, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 12, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 12, 2026
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07913022
Lead sponsor
Hasanuddin University
Responsible party
Shinta Lucia Takahindangen (Principal Investigator, Hasanuddin University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Jun 12, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 12, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 12, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Shinta Lucia Takahindangen, drg
principal investigator · Hasanuddin University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion