ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07911111Updated Nov 2, 2026

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Adolescents With Emotional Difficulties

An interventional study of An intervention protocol based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in Emotional Difficulties, sponsored by Juan Miguel Flujas. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Juan Miguel Flujas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
14 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This exploratory study aimed to describe pretest-posttest changes in emotional regulation difficulties, processes related to psychological flexibility, and anxiety and depressive symptoms in six adolescents who participated in a school-based intervention grounded in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).

Read the detailed description

Background/objectives: Emotional regulation and psychological flexibility have been associated with greater well-being and a lower risk of psychological disorders. Therefore, they have been proposed as relevant variables in interventions with adolescents. This exploratory study aimed to describe pretest-posttest changes in emotional regulation difficulties, processes related to psychological flexibility, and anxiety and depressive symptoms in six adolescents who participated in a school-based intervention grounded in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Method: Six female adolescents aged 14-16 years participated in the study. A pre-experimental design with pretest-posttest assessments and no control group was employed. The intervention consisted of 10 weekly sessions and was delivered in person, while maintaining the naturally occurring groups established within the academic setting. Results: Statistically significant differences with large effect sizes were found in emotional regulation, experiential avoidance, and cognitive fusion (core processes of psychological inflexibility), along with a reduction in anxiety and depressive symptoms at posttest. At the individual level, significant decreases in experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, and depressive symptoms were observed in a high percentage of participants. Discussion: These preliminary findings suggest that the protocol has potential for use with adolescents experiencing emotional difficulties.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emotional Difficulties

Keywords

  • Psychological flexibility
  • Emotion regulation
  • Adolescence
  • Anxiety
  • Depression
03

In context

Emotional Regulation

545 studies on the registry are indexed under Emotional Regulation; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 79 across 498 interventional studies indexed under Emotional Regulation.

Browse Emotional Regulation studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Juan Miguel Flujas as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 14-16 years.
  • Not receiving psychological support before the intervention began.
  • Scoring at or above the cut-off point (≥ 60) on the Emotional Problems Index of the self-report version of the Assessment System for Children and Adolescents (SENA; Fernández-Pinto et al., 2015) for secondary education.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single-group

    Behavioral: An intervention protocol based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). This intervention aimed to improve difficulties in emotional regulation, processes associated with psychological flexibility, and anxiety and depressive symptoms through the use of ACT-specific metaphors and experiential exercises, combined with content from Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). The intervention consisted of 10 weekly one-hour sessions, three of which were individual sessions (sessions 1, 5, and 10), while the remaining seven were conducted in a group format. The intervention was delivered face-to-face, respecting the naturally established groups within the academic setting.

    Behavioral: An intervention protocol based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

Interventions

  • BehavioralAn intervention protocol based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

    This intervention aimed to improve difficulties in emotional regulation, processes associated with psychological flexibility, and anxiety and depressive symptoms through the use of ACT-specific metaphors and experiential exercises, combined with content from Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). The intervention consisted of 10 weekly one-hour sessions, three of which were individual sessions (sessions 1, 5, and 10), while the remaining seven were conducted in a group format. The intervention was delivered face-to-face, respecting the naturally established groups within the academic setting.

    Also known as: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gómez-Simón et al., 2014)

    It is a 36-item scale designed to assess emotion regulation strategies. It comprises six subscales: awareness, impulse control, non-acceptance, goal-directed behavior, emotional clarity, and access to emotion regulation strategies. Cronbach's alpha ranged from .62 to .88

    Time frame: Change from baseline immediately after the intervention

  2. The Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y; Valdivia-Salas et al., 2016)

    It consists of 17 items comprising two factors: experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion (core processes of psychological inflexibility). Cronbach's alpha ranged from .76 to .87

    Time frame: Change from baseline immediately after the intervention

  3. The Willingness and Action Measure for Children and Adolescents (WAM-C/A; Cobos-Sánchez et al., 2020)

    It consists of 14 items and assesses psychological flexibility through two subscales: willingness to remain in contact with unpleasant experiences and values-based action. Cronbach's alpha ranged from .72 to .81

    Time frame: Change from baseline immediately after the intervention

  4. The Committed Action Questionnaire (CAQ-8; Escoz-Rodríguez et al., in press) in its 8-item version

    Assesses the positive and negative aspects of committed action, defined as an individual's willingness to persist in goal-directed behavior. Cronbach's alpha ranged from .69 to .80

    Time frame: Change from baseline immediately after the intervention

  5. The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS; Osma et al., 2022)

    It is a five-item unidimensional scale designed to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms and associated functional impairment in specific situations or as a state measure. Cronbach's alpha was .94

    Time frame: Change from baseline immediately after the intervention

  6. The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS; Osma et al., 2022)

    It is a five-item unidimensional scale designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms and associated functional impairment as a state or in specific situations. Cronbach's alpha was .95

    Time frame: Change from baseline immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS; Osma et al., 2022)

    It is a five-item unidimensional scale designed to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms and associated functional impairment in specific situations or as a state measure. Cronbach's alpha was .94

    Time frame: Pre-session assessment (sessions 2-10)

  2. The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS; Osma et al., 2022)

    It is a five-item unidimensional scale designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms and associated functional impairment as a state or in specific situations. Cronbach's alpha was .95

    Time frame: Pre-session assessment (sessions 2-10)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • I.E.S. Sol de Portocarrero
    Almería, Almería 04120, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cobos-Sánchez, L., Flujas-Contreras, J. M., & Gómez, I. (2020). Willingness and Action Measure for Adolescents: psychometric validation in Spanish adolescents. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.006
  • Escoz-Rodríguez, I., Flujas-Contreras, J. M., & Gómez, I. (In press). Commitment Action Questionnaire (CAQ-8): Spanish validation in adolescents.
  • Fernández-Pinto, I., Santamaría, P., Sánchez-Sánchez, F., Carrasco, M. A., & del Barrio, V. (2015a). SENA. Sistema de Evaluación de Niños y Adolescentes. Manual de Aplicación, Corrección e Interpretación. TEA Ediciones.
  • Fernández-Pinto, I., Santamaría, P., Sánchez-Sánchez, F., Carrasco, M. A., & del Barrio, V. (2015b). SENA. Sistema de Evaluación de Niños y Adolescentes. Manual Técnico. TEA Ediciones.
  • Osma J, Martinez-Loredo V, Diaz-Garcia A, Quilez-Orden A, Peris-Baquero O. Spanish Adaptation of the Overall Anxiety and Depression Severity and Impairment Scales in University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 29;19(1):345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010345. PubMed 35010602 ↗
  • Gomez-Simon I, Penelo E, de la Osa N. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Difficulties Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema. 2014;26(3):401-8. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.324. PubMed 25069562 ↗
  • Valdivia-Salas S, Martin-Albo J, Zaldivar P, Lombas AS, Jimenez TI. Spanish Validation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Assessment. 2017 Oct;24(7):919-931. doi: 10.1177/1073191116632338. Epub 2016 Feb 17. PubMed 26887809 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Not at the moment

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07911111
Lead sponsor
Juan Miguel Flujas
Collaborators
European Regional Development Fund, State Research Agency, Spain, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain
Responsible party
Juan Miguel Flujas (PhD in Psychology, Universidad de Almeria) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 22, 2025
Completion
Jun 22, 2025
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Inmaculada Gómez, Full Professor of Psychology
principal investigator · Universidad de Almeria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion