ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07910409Updated Nov 2, 2026

Construction and Validation of an Impulse Oscillometry (IOS)-Based Platform for Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Chronic Airway Diseases

An observational study in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Asthma (Diagnosis), sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,800
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, observational study aiming to construct and validate an Impulse Oscillometry (IOS)-based platform for the screening, diagnosis, and management of chronic airway diseases (COPD and asthma). The study consists of two phases. Phase 1 is a cross-sectional study to build and validate diagnostic models for COPD and asthma using IOS parameters, with respiratory specialists' clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. Phase 2 is a 48-week prospective cohort study to develop a prognostic model for predicting acute exacerbation risk based on IOS parameters. Approximately 2,800 participants will be enrolled from hospitals, physical examination centers, and community health centers across China. The results will provide evidence for the clinical application of IOS technology in chronic airway disease management.

Read the detailed description

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchial asthma are the most common chronic airway diseases, affecting approximately 600 million people worldwide. In China, the prevalence of COPD among adults aged 20 years or older is 8.6%, and the prevalence of asthma is 4.2%, representing a substantial disease burden. Despite increasing healthcare expenditures, key clinical outcomes have not improved accordingly. The prevention and management of these diseases face three major challenges: low rates of early diagnosis, non-standardized management, and weak diagnostic capacity at the primary care level.

Conventional spirometry, as the primary method for assessing respiratory function, relies on forced expiratory maneuvers and is therefore difficult to perform in elderly, pediatric, and severely ill patients. Moreover, it is relatively insensitive for detecting small airway dysfunction, an early pathological change in chronic airway diseases. Impulse oscillometry (IOS), the most widely used forced oscillation technique, measures respiratory system impedance-including resistance and reactance parameters-non-invasively based on the spectral relationship between pressure and airflow during tidal breathing. IOS is highly sensitive to small airway changes and requires minimal patient cooperation, making it a valuable complementary tool to spirometry.

Previous studies have demonstrated the clinical value of IOS parameters in the diagnosis and assessment of COPD and asthma. IOS parameters such as R5-R20, Fres, and AX correlate significantly with FEF25-75 measured by spirometry and show higher sensitivity. In subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms but preserved pulmonary function, IOS is more sensitive than spirometry for detecting small airway dysfunction. Recent domestic studies have further explored new IOS-based severity classification systems for COPD. However, the clinical application of IOS in China still faces key bottlenecks: the lack of diagnostic criteria and standardized pathways based on the Chinese population; unclear value in dynamic disease management and prognosis prediction; and the absence of high-level evidence on its effectiveness in real-world settings, especially in primary care. Therefore, systematic research on IOS technology and platform construction is urgently needed to promote its precise and standardized application.

Our previous work has explored the value of IOS in COPD screening, auxiliary diagnosis, and severity assessment. We first constructed an IOS-based screening pathway for COPD using a prediction model for the FEV1/FVC ratio, published in The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific, and applied for a corresponding invention patent (202411415494.X). In asthma patients, we were the first to discover the effectiveness of combining IOS with FeNO in identifying patients with inadequately controlled asthma. These preliminary studies provide a key methodological and evidentiary basis for the systematic construction of a "screening-diagnosis-management" platform in this project.

Study Objectives To construct and validate IOS-based diagnostic models for chronic airway diseases: Participants will be enrolled from respiratory and critical care medicine outpatient clinics and physical examination centers across multiple centers. Using respiratory specialists' clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, diagnostic models for COPD and asthma based on IOS parameters will be established, optimal diagnostic thresholds will be determined, and diagnostic performance indicators including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) will be systematically evaluated. In addition, external validation of the screening models for COPD and asthma will be conducted in multicenter community populations.

To construct IOS-based prognostic warning models for chronic airway diseases: In patients with confirmed stable COPD or asthma, a 48-week prospective cohort follow-up will be conducted to analyze the association between IOS parameters and future acute exacerbation risk, and to construct a Cox proportional hazards regression prediction model for dynamic management and prognostic warning of chronic airway diseases.

Study Design This is a multicenter, observational study consisting of two phases. Phase 1: Construction and Validation of IOS-Based Screening and Diagnostic Models for Chronic Airway Diseases This phase is a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Participants aged 18-80 years will be enrolled from respiratory and critical care medicine outpatient clinics, physical examination centers, and community health centers in multiple regions across China (Northeast, Central South, East China, Northwest, and Southwest). Using respiratory specialists' final clinical diagnosis (COPD/asthma/other) as the gold standard, which is based on symptoms, spirometry results (including bronchodilation/bronchial challenge tests), and other clinical indicators, IOS-based diagnostic models for COPD and asthma will be constructed. Data collected include demographic information, clinical information, screening questionnaires (COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, ECRHS), IOS parameters (R5, R20, R5-R20, AX, Fres), spirometry parameters (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, MMEF), and inflammatory biomarkers (blood eosinophil count, total IgE, FeNO). Feature selection will be performed using LASSO regression or stepwise logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression will be used to construct diagnostic models, and a visual nomogram will be developed to facilitate clinical decision-making. Model performance will be evaluated in a multicenter external validation set using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The optimal diagnostic thresholds will be determined, and the models will be compared with traditional screening questionnaires.

Phase 2: Construction of an IOS-Based Dynamic Management and Prognostic Warning Platform for Chronic Airway Diseases This phase is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Patients aged 18-80 years with confirmed stable COPD (meeting GOLD criteria) or asthma (meeting GINA criteria) will be enrolled. Stable disease is defined as no acute exacerbation within the past 4 weeks, without the need for systemic glucocorticoids or increased routine medication. Participants will be followed up every 12 weeks for 48 weeks. Data collected at each visit include respiratory symptoms, acute exacerbation events (frequency, severity, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations), new comorbidities, mortality, and treatment adjustments. Symptom and quality of life assessments will be performed using mMRC, CAT, ACQ, AQLQ, and SGRQ. The primary outcome is acute exacerbation events, defined as symptom deterioration requiring systemic glucocorticoids, antibiotics, emergency department visits, or hospitalization. Secondary outcomes include annual decline in lung function, changes in quality of life scores, and all-cause and respiratory-related mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression models will be used to analyze the association between IOS parameters and future acute exacerbation risk and to construct a prognostic prediction model. Model performance will be evaluated using the C-index, calibration curves, and time-dependent ROC curves for predicting exacerbation risk at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Study Population Phase 1: Participants aged 18-80 years from respiratory clinics, physical examination centers, and community health centers across China. Inclusion criteria: clear consciousness, basic communication and comprehension ability, able to cooperate with questionnaires and IOS/spirometry examinations, and willing to sign written informed consent. Exclusion criteria: respiratory infection within the past 4 weeks; other severe pulmonary diseases affecting lung function (e.g., active tuberculosis, extensive bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, chest wall deformity, lung cancer); severe dysfunction of heart, brain, liver, or kidney (e.g., NYHA class III-IV, severe arrhythmia, uremia) or uncontrolled malignancy; cognitive impairment or psychiatric disorders; pregnancy or lactation; contraindications to pulmonary function tests.

Phase 2: Patients aged 18-80 years with confirmed stable COPD (GOLD criteria) or asthma (GINA criteria). Exclusion criteria: comorbid severe respiratory diseases (e.g., bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, lung cancer, active tuberculosis); severe heart, liver, or kidney dysfunction (e.g., NYHA class III-IV, end-stage liver disease, dialysis-dependent renal disease); conditions affecting pulmonary function test accuracy (e.g., chest wall deformity, pneumothorax, recent thoracic or abdominal surgery); severe cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, or communication barriers; planned relocation within 1 year or inability to complete regular follow-up; pregnancy or lactation.

Sample Size A total of 2,800 participants will be enrolled. Phase 1: Approximately 1,800 participants (600 from hospitals and 1,200 from communities). For the diagnostic model, 14 predictor variables will be included. Based on the principle of subjects per variable (SPV) > 10, the training set requires at least 140 participants. Assuming a COPD and asthma prevalence of approximately 25% in the hospital population, a total of 600 participants will be needed from hospital outpatient and physical examination centers (at least 150 COPD and 150 asthma patients). For external validation in the community, based on the confidence interval width of the AUC, with a 95% confidence level (two-sided) and a required 95% CI width not exceeding 0.15, and assuming an AUC of 0.80 for both COPD and asthma, at least 55 COPD patients (corresponding to approximately 400 participants) and 50 asthma patients (corresponding to approximately 1,200 participants) will be needed. Therefore, a total of approximately 1,200 community participants will be required for external validation.

Phase 2: Approximately 1,000 participants. Based on the requirements for constructing a Cox proportional hazards regression model with 14 predictor variables and SPV > 10, the training set requires at least 140 participants. Assuming an annual exacerbation rate of 40% for COPD and 30% for asthma, with a 15% dropout rate, the required sample size for COPD patients is (140/0.40) × 1.15 ≈ 400 (at least 160 with exacerbations), and for asthma patients is (140/0.30) × 1.15 ≈ 550 (at least 165 with exacerbations). Therefore, a total of 1,000 patients with confirmed COPD or asthma will be enrolled.

Measurements IOS parameters: R5, R20, R5-R20, AX, Fres. Spirometry parameters: FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, MMEF. Inflammatory biomarkers: blood eosinophil count, total IgE, FeNO. Questionnaires: COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, ECRHS, mMRC, CAT, ACQ, AQLQ, SGRQ. Imaging: chest HRCT (inspiratory and expiratory phases) in Phase 2. Outcomes: acute exacerbation events, lung function decline, quality of life changes, and mortality.

Statistical Analysis Phase 1: Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis (Pearson/Spearman), multiple imputation for missing data, LASSO or stepwise logistic regression for feature selection, multivariable logistic regression for model construction, nomogram development, ROC curve analysis (AUC, 95% CI, Youden index, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV), calibration curve with Hosmer-Lemeshow test, decision curve analysis (DCA), and DeLong test for model comparison.

Phase 2: Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation or Kruskal-Wallis test for clinical association analysis, LASSO regression for feature selection, Cox proportional hazards regression for prognostic model construction, C-index for discrimination, calibration curve for calibration, and time-dependent ROC curves for predicting exacerbation risk at 3, 6, and 12 months. R software (version 4.3.0 or above) will be used. All tests will be two-sided, and P \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Expected Outcomes Establishment of IOS-based diagnostic models for chronic airway diseases, with optimal diagnostic thresholds and performance indicators for COPD and asthma in the Chinese population.

Construction of an IOS-based dynamic management and prognostic warning platform, including a Cox regression risk prediction model for acute exacerbations, forming a new strategy covering the full cycle of "screening-diagnosis-warning" for chronic airway diseases.

Generation of high-quality, localized evidence to support the clinical promotion of domestic portable IOS devices, technological iteration, and the formulation of related health policies (e.g., primary care respiratory disease screening standards and device configuration criteria).

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Asthma (Diagnosis)

Keywords

  • Impulse Oscillometry
  • IOS
  • COPD
  • Asthma
  • Diagnosis
  • Prognosis
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,520 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 856 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,800 is above the median of 158 across 1,497 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Chao Yang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 140 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes participants aged 18-80 years from multiple regions across China (Northeast, Central South, East China, Northwest, and Southwest). Phase 1 is a multicenter cross-sectional study enrolling participants from respiratory and critical care medicine outpatient clinics, physical examination centers, and community health centers, including those with chronic respiratory symptoms and healthy individuals, to construct and validate IOS-based diagnostic models for COPD and asthma. Phase 2 is a multicenter prospective cohort study enrolling patients with confirmed stable COPD (GOLD criteria) or asthma (GINA criteria) for a 48-week follow-up to develop prognostic warning models for acute exacerbation risk.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 80 years.
  • Phase 1: Participants from respiratory and critical care medicine outpatient clinics, physical examination centers, and community health centers; conscious, with basic communication and comprehension ability, able to cooperate with questionnaires and IOS/spirometry examinations; willing to sign written .
  • Phase 2: Patients with confirmed stable (meeting GOLD criteria) or asthma (meeting GINA criteria); stable disease defined as no acute exacerbation within the past 4 weeks, without the need for systemic or increased routine medication; willing to sign written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Phase 1: Respiratory infection within the past 4 weeks; other severe pulmonary diseases affecting lung function (e.g., active tuberculosis, extensive bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, chest wall deformity, lung cancer); severe dysfunction of heart, brain, liver, or kidney (e.g., class III-IV, severe arrhythmia, uremia) or uncontrolled ; cognitive impairment or psychiatric disorders; pregnancy or lactation; to pulmonary function tests.
  • Phase 2: Comorbid severe respiratory diseases (e.g., bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, lung cancer, active tuberculosis); severe heart, liver, or kidney dysfunction (e.g., NYHA class III-IV, end-stage liver disease, dialysis-dependent renal disease); conditions affecting pulmonary function test accuracy (e.g., chest wall deformity, pneumothorax, recent thoracic or abdominal surgery); severe cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, or communication barriers; planned relocation within 1 year or inability to complete regular follow-up; pregnancy or lactation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,800 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of IOS-based models for COPD and asthma

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and optimal diagnostic cutoff values of IOS-based diagnostic models for COPD and asthma, using respiratory specialists' clinical diagnosis as the gold standard.

    Time frame: At enrollment (cross-sectional assessment)

  2. Acute exacerbation events

    Acute exacerbation events, defined as symptom deterioration requiring systemic glucocorticoid use, antibiotic use, emergency department visits, or hospitalization. Frequency, severity, and duration of emergency department visits or hospitalizations will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline to 48 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • eijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100020, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — A definitive plan for sharing individual participant data (IPD) has not been established for this study. The possibility of data sharing is under consideration and will be contingent upon obtaining approval from the institutional review board and ensuring compliance with local data privacy regulations. Further details will be specified in a future update to the registration record if a sharing plan is formalized.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2028, 26 months after the start.

Of 466 non-industry observational studies under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 64. This study's planned 26 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 586 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 58.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2026
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
StartActual
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07910409
Collaborators
The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Hospital, General Hospital of Beijing Jingmei Group, Suqian Branch, Jiangsu Province Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Kewu Huang, MD
Contact
kewuhuang@126.com
+86-13601234681

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion