ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07906392ESP-SPSIPUpdated Nov 2, 2026

ESP Versus SPSIP Block for Pain Relief After Shoulder Arthroscopy

An interventional study of High Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block in Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Ferit Yetik. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Ferit Yetik · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 30, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare two regional anesthesia techniques for pain relief after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: high thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block and serratus posterior superior intercostal plane (SPSIP) block. Both techniques involve injecting a local anesthetic into tissue layers in the upper back under ultrasound guidance.

The study will include 80 adults aged 18 to 75 years undergoing elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery at Bursa City Hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either an ESP block or an SPSIP block before general anesthesia. Participants and the clinician assessing postoperative outcomes will not know which block was assigned.

All participants will receive a standardized pain management regimen, including a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump that delivers tramadol when they press a button. Additional pain relief will be provided when needed.

The main aim is to compare the total amount of tramadol delivered by the PCA pump during the first 24 hours after surgery. Other assessments will include pain at rest and during movement, quality of recovery at 24 hours, additional pain medication requirements, remifentanil use during surgery, and side effects or complications related to the blocks and opioid medications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Shoulder Arthroscopy
  • Erector Spinae Plane Block
  • Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block
  • Regional Anesthesia
  • Postoperative Analgesia
  • Patient-Controlled Analgesia
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is close to the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Ferit Yetik is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia.

Provision of .

Age between 18 and 75 years.

(ASA) physical status I-III. -

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of bleeding diathesis or current anticoagulant therapy.

Known allergy to local anesthetics or opioid medications.

Infection at the planned block injection site.

Suspected pregnancy, pregnancy, or breastfeeding.

Refusal to participate.

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.

Intellectual disability.

Regular opioid use for chronic pain management.

Technical inability to successfully perform the assigned block.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High Thoracic ESP Block

    Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided high thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the T2 level on the surgical side before general anesthesia, using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine at 1:200,000. All participants will receive standardized general anesthesia and postoperative multimodal analgesia, including tramadol patient-controlled analgesia.

    Procedure: High Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block

  • Experimental
    SPSIP Block

    Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided serratus posterior superior intercostal plane (SPSIP) block on the surgical side before general anesthesia, using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine at 1:200,000. All participants will receive standardized general anesthesia and postoperative multimodal analgesia, including tramadol patient-controlled analgesia.

    Procedure: Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureHigh Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block

    Before general anesthesia, an ultrasound-guided block will be performed at the T2 level on the surgical side with the participant in the sitting position. A single injection of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine at 1:200,000 will be administered into the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process.

    Also known as: ESP Block

  • ProcedureSerratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block

    Before general anesthesia, an ultrasound-guided block will be performed on the surgical side with the participant in the sitting position and the hand placed on the opposite shoulder. The probe will be positioned sagittally medial to the scapula at the second and third ribs. Following hydrodissection with 2 mL of saline, a single injection of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine at 1:200,000 will be administered into the plane between the serratus posterior superior and intercostal muscles.

    Also known as: SPSIP Block

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total PCA Tramadol Consumption During the First 24 Hours After Surgery

    The cumulative dose of tramadol delivered through the intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump during the first 24 postoperative hours will be recorded in milligrams and compared between the groups. Only tramadol actually delivered by the PCA pump will be included. Intraoperative tramadol and rescue meperidine will not be included in this outcome.

    Time frame: First 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain at Rest

    Pain intensity at rest will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores will be compared between the groups at each assessment time point.

    Time frame: At 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours after surgery

  2. Postoperative Pain During Movement

    Pain intensity during movement will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores will be compared between the groups at each assessment time point.

    Time frame: At 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours after surgery

  3. Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Score

    Postoperative quality of recovery will be assessed using the 15-item Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better recovery. Total scores will be compared between the groups.

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

  4. Incidence of Block-Related Complications

    The number and percentage of participants experiencing complications related to the regional block will be recorded and compared between the groups. The type of each complication will be documented.

    Time frame: From block administration through 24 hours after surgery

  5. Incidence of Opioid-Related Adverse Effects

    The number and percentage of participants experiencing opioid-related adverse effects, including nausea, vomiting, and pruritus, will be recorded and compared between the groups. Each adverse effect will be documented separately.

    Time frame: First 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Mar 2027, 4 months later.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 22, 2026
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 15, 2027
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: responsible party
  2. Oct 30, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07906392
Lead sponsor
Ferit Yetik
Collaborators
Bursa City Hospital
Responsible party
Ferit Yetik (Specialist in Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
Start date
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Yusuf Alan, MD
Contact
dryusufalan@gmail.com
+905396210977
Onur Güneş, MD
Contact
onurguness96@gmail.com
+905319418938
Mürsel Ekinci
principal investigator · Bursa City Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion