ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07905781Updated Oct 29, 2026

Clinical Management and Outcomes After Lung Scintigraphy for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department

An observational study in Pulmonary Embolism (Diagnosis), sponsored by Antalya Health Sciences University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-29.

Sponsored by Antalya Health Sciences University · Observational

Updated Oct 29, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will review the medical records of adults evaluated for a suspected blood clot in the lungs (pulmonary embolism) in the emergency department at Antalya Training and Research Hospital. It will include patients who underwent a lung perfusion scan, which shows blood flow in the lungs. Some patients also underwent a ventilation scan, which shows airflow in the lungs.

The main aim is to assess how scan findings were related to clinical decisions, including starting or stopping blood-thinning treatment, requesting additional imaging, and admitting patients to hospital or discharging them. The study will also examine time spent in the emergency department and hospital, intensive care admission, return visits to the emergency department, and deaths within 30 days.

Researchers will compare patients who had a perfusion scan alone with those who also had a ventilation scan. All tests and treatments were provided as part of routine care. The study will use existing records only; patients will not undergo additional tests, receive study treatments, or be contacted for research.

Read the detailed description

This single-center, retrospective observational cohort study will use routinely collected electronic health records from Antalya Training and Research Hospital. The historical review period begins on January 1, 2019, and extends to the ethics committee approval date. All eligible records within this period will be screened without random sampling.

Data sources will include emergency department records, nuclear medicine reports, laboratory results, radiology reports, and discharge summaries. Extracted variables will include presenting symptoms, comorbidities, risk factors for venous thromboembolism, vital signs, renal function, pregnancy status, contrast allergy, and available laboratory and imaging findings.

In routine practice at the study center, pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy is performed first. Ventilation scintigraphy is added when the perfusion findings require further clarification or when considered necessary by the nuclear medicine team. Imaging selection is determined by clinical care rather than the research protocol. Scan findings will be classified according to the original nuclear medicine reports as normal or low probability, high probability or suggestive of pulmonary embolism, or intermediate probability or nondiagnostic.

Clinical management before and after the scan report will be reviewed where documented. Management changes will be assessed using recorded diagnostic assessments, anticoagulation decisions, requests for additional imaging, and disposition decisions. A decision occurring after scintigraphy will not, by timing alone, be considered evidence that the scan changed management; attribution will depend on the available clinical documentation. Subsequent outcomes will be ascertained from existing records without additional patient contact.

Duplicate records from the same clinical episode will be excluded. Missing information and the availability of follow-up records will be documented. Absence of a recorded return visit or death will be distinguished from confirmed absence of the event.

Analyses will describe patient characteristics, scan findings, management decisions, and outcomes. Comparisons will be performed by imaging pathway and scan-result category using appropriate methods for categorical and continuous variables. Regression analyses may be used to examine associations with management changes and clinical outcomes, depending on the available sample size and number of events. Comparisons between imaging pathways will be interpreted with consideration of differences in clinical indications and baseline characteristics.

Data will be de-identified before analysis. No additional imaging, treatment, laboratory testing, or biological sample collection will be performed for research purposes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Embolism (Diagnosis)

Keywords

  • Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
  • Pulmonary Perfusion Scintigraphy
  • Ventilation/Perfusion Scintigraphy
  • Emergency Department
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Patient Outcomes
03

In context

Pulmonary Embolism

756 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Embolism; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 361 across 332 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Embolism.

Browse Pulmonary Embolism studies →

Lead sponsor

Antalya Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults aged 18 years or older who presented to the emergency department of Antalya Training and Research Hospital with suspected pulmonary embolism and underwent pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy, with or without additional ventilation scintigraphy, between January 1, 2019, and September 4, 2026. All eligible patients within this period will be identified retrospectively from hospital records. Approximately 100 patients are expected to be included.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older at the index emergency department visit.
  • Evaluation for suspected pulmonary embolism at Antalya Training and Research Hospital during the study period.
  • Completion of pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy, with or without additional ventilation scintigraphy, for suspected pulmonary embolism.
  • Availability of medical records containing the demographic, clinical, imaging, and outcome information required for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scintigraphy performed for an indication other than suspected pulmonary embolism.
  • Scintigraphy requested by a department other than the emergency department.
  • Scintigraphy requested but not completed.
  • Unavailable scintigraphy reports or essential clinical records.
  • Unavailable essential outcome information, including emergency department disposition, hospitalization, intensive care admission, or mortality status.
  • Duplicate records relating to the same clinical episode. Separate episodes involving a new evaluation for suspected pulmonary embolism may be included as distinct clinical episodes.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Perfusion Scintigraphy Only

    Adults evaluated for suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department who underwent pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy without additional ventilation scintigraphy during routine clinical care. Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, management decisions, and patient outcomes will be assessed retrospectively from existing medical records.

    Diagnostic Test: Pulmonary Perfusion Scintigraphy

  • Perfusion Scintigraphy With Additional Ventilation Scintigraphy

    Adults evaluated for suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department who underwent pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy followed by additional ventilation scintigraphy during routine clinical care. Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, management decisions, and patient outcomes will be assessed retrospectively from existing medical records.

    Diagnostic Test: Pulmonary Perfusion Scintigraphy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPulmonary Perfusion Scintigraphy

    Pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy performed during routine clinical care to evaluate suspected pulmonary embolism. Findings will be extracted retrospectively from existing nuclear medicine reports. No additional imaging will be performed for research purposes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients With a Documented Clinical Management Change Related to Scintigraphy Findings

    Percentage of patients with at least one documented change related to scintigraphy findings in the diagnostic assessment of pulmonary embolism, initiation or discontinuation of anticoagulation, requests for additional imaging, or admission or discharge plans. Changes will be identified by retrospectively comparing documented assessments and plans before and after the scintigraphy report. A decision occurring after scintigraphy without evidence of a change in the documented plan will not be classified as a management change.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after the scintigraphy report becomes available.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Waxman AD, Bajc M, Brown M, Fahey FH, Freeman LM, Haramati LB, Julien P, Le Gal G, Neilly B, Rabin J, Soudry G, Tapson V, Torbati S, Kauffman J, Ahuja S, Donohoe K. Appropriate Use Criteria for Ventilation-Perfusion Imaging in Pulmonary Embolism: Summary and Excerpts. J Nucl Med. 2017 May;58(5):13N-15N. No abstract available. PubMed 28461589 ↗
  • Bajc M, Schumichen C, Gruning T, Lindqvist A, Le Roux PY, Alatri A, Bauer RW, Dilic M, Neilly B, Verberne HJ, Delgado Bolton RC, Jonson B. EANM guideline for ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and beyond. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Nov;46(12):2429-2451. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04450-0. Epub 2019 Aug 13. PubMed 31410539 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data will not be shared because the dataset contains potentially sensitive clinical information obtained retrospectively from hospital records. Only aggregate results will be reported to protect patient privacy and confidentiality.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 29, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07905781
Lead sponsor
Antalya Health Sciences University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 29, 2026
Start date
Oct 10, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2026

Study contacts

murat Duyan, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Contact
drmuratduyan@gmail.com
+905401561989

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion