ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07904884FLT3 - M vs RUpdated Nov 4, 2026

MAC vs RIC for Transplantation in FLT3-ITD-Mutated AML Guided by UHS-NGS MRD ( FLT3 - MAC vs RIC )

An interventional study of RIC and MAC in ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION and Acute Myeloid Leukemia, sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 29, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
310
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, open-label, 1:1 randomized non-inferiority trial with stratification. The study will enroll patients aged 18-60 years with FLT3-ITD-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are in first complete remission (CR1) and have no detectable FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease (MRD) by polymerase chain reaction-next-generation sequencing (PCR-NGS) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC) before allo-HSCT. All patients will receive FLT3 inhibitor maintenance therapy after transplantation.

The primary objective is to determine whether RIC is non-inferior to MAC in terms of 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS), defined as the time from transplantation to relapse or death from any cause. Secondary objectives include comparisons of overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), cumulative incidence of relapse, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) between the two conditioning groups.

Read the detailed description

FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) is an adverse prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and post-transplant FLT3 inhibitor maintenance have improved outcomes, relapse remains a major cause of treatment failure. Conditioning intensity is an important determinant of both relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM), and the optimal conditioning strategy for patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML remains uncertain.

Previous studies have shown that myeloablative conditioning (MAC) can reduce relapse compared with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), particularly in patients with detectable measurable residual disease (MRD) before transplantation. However, the benefits of MAC must be balanced against its greater treatment-related toxicity. These findings suggest that pre-transplant MRD status may help identify patients who can achieve adequate disease control with less intensive conditioning. In addition, post-transplant FLT3 inhibitor maintenance provides an additional strategy for reducing relapse risk in patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML.

A retrospective study conducted by the Chinese TROPHY collaborative group evaluated 219 patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML undergoing allo-HSCT, most of whom received post-transplant FLT3 inhibitor maintenance. Among patients with detectable pre-transplant FLT3-ITD MRD by an ultrasensitive next-generation sequencing assay, RIC was associated with higher relapse incidence and inferior relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than MAC. In contrast, outcomes were comparable between conditioning groups among patients with undetectable pre-transplant molecular MRD. These findings support further prospective evaluation of an MRD-guided conditioning strategy.

This multicenter, open-label, randomized non-inferiority trial will compare RIC with MAC in patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML who are in first complete remission and have no detectable pre-transplant FLT3-ITD MRD by polymerase chain reaction-next-generation sequencing (PCR-NGS). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two conditioning strategies, and all participants will receive FLT3 inhibitor maintenance after allo-HSCT. The study is designed to determine whether RIC provides comparable relapse-free survival to MAC in this molecularly defined population while potentially reducing conditioning-related toxicity and NRM. The results may help establish a prospective evidence base for integrating pre-transplant molecular MRD status and post-transplant maintenance therapy into individualized conditioning-intensity selection.

02

Conditions studied

  • ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

  • FLT3-mutated AML
  • Myeloablative Conditioning
  • Reduced-intensity conditioning
  • Ultra-high-sensitivity next-generation sequencing(UHS-NGS)
03

In context

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

3,667 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; 816 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 310 is above the median of 40 across 3,005 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.

Browse Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute studies →

Lead sponsor

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University is the lead sponsor of 263 studies on the registry; 144 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age between 18 to 60 years, any gender
  2. Diagnosis of AML according to WHO criteria
  3. Presence of FLT3-ITD mutation at diagnosis
  4. In first complete remission
  5. Planned first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using peripheral blood stem cells
  6. Planned post-transplant maintenance therapy with a FLT3 inhibitor (including sorafenib or gilteritinib)
  7. FLT3-ITD UHS-NGS MRD \< 0.001% at 14 to 28 days prior to transplantation
  8. Completion of routine pre-transplant assessments; in the investigator's judgment, the patient is able to complete the conditioning regimen, stem cell infusion, and study follow-up as planned;
  9. HCT-CI score of 0 to 2; in the investigator's judgment, the patient is eligible for either MAC or RIC conditioning intensity
  10. performance status at 0 to 2
  11. Estimated survival time ≥ 6 months
  12. Major organ function meets the following requirements: and AST ≤2.5 × ; Total ≤1.5 × ULN; subjects with Gilbert syndrome or elevated indirect bilirubin due to documented inactive hemolysis may be enrolled at the investigator's discretion; ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m², and not receiving maintenance dialysis; ≥50%, or cardiac function status determined by the investigator to be adequate to tolerate the study treatment; No requirement for high-flow oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation support at rest
  13. Blood pressure is well-controlled; systolic blood pressure \<160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg at rest during the screening period; if receiving antihypertensive therapy, the dosage should be essentially stable prior to randomization
  14. Able to undergo assessments (including complete blood count, reticulocyte count, iron metabolism markers, adverse event monitoring, and transfusion records) as required by the protocol, and demonstrates good compliance
  15. Women of have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test; subjects of childbearing potential and their partners are willing to use effective measures during the study and for the specified period following the last dose
  16. The subject or their legally authorized representative has signed a written form approved by the ethics committee prior to the implementation of any study-specific procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  2. Achieved complete remission (CR) only after more than two cycles of induction therapy, or met the criteria for primary AML
  3. Clear evidence of disease progression, relapse, or a need to immediately initiate new anti-tumor therapy prior to randomization, which could significantly impact the assessment of study endpoints
  4. Active central nervous system (CNS) leukemia
  5. Uncontrolled severe infection prior to randomization, including but not limited to: Sepsis or septic shock; Active invasive fungal infection; Bacterial or viral infection requiring escalation of broad-spectrum anti-infective therapy where the clinical condition remains unstable; Other severe infections deemed by the investigator to make the patient unsuitable for enrollment
  6. Concomitant high-risk cardiovascular or cerebrovascular conditions, including: Myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or within 6 months prior to randomization; Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or other thromboembolic events within 6 months prior to randomization; (NYHA) Class III-IV heart failure; Uncontrolled severe cardiac arrhythmia; Unacceptable thrombotic risk as determined by the investigator
  7. Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as resting systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg despite optimized antihypertensive therapy
  8. Gastrointestinal disorders significantly affecting oral drug absorption or adherence (e.g., persistent vomiting, short bowel syndrome, active severe diarrhea, or other conditions judged by the investigator to significantly affect drug exposure), or inability to tolerate post-transplant FLT3 inhibitor maintenance therapy as determined by the investigator
  9. Pregnant or lactating women, or individuals unwilling to use effective measures
  10. Participation in another interventional clinical trial involving treatment with an drug or device within the 4 weeks prior to randomization, where the investigator determines that such participation might interfere with the results of this study
  11. Presence of uncontrolled psychiatric disorders, cognitive impairment, substance abuse, or other conditions that could affect , adherence, or safety follow-up
  12. Any other medical, laboratory, or social factors that, in the investigator's opinion, could increase the risk to the subject, affect study adherence, or interfere with the assessment of efficacy or safety
  13. Concurrent active ; exceptions include: Malignancies that have been curatively treated with no evidence of recurrence within 5 years; Adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin; Treated carcinoma in situ determined by the investigator to have no impact on the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
310 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    MAC

    Myeloablative conditioning is administered prior to allogeneic peripheral-blood hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Acceptable regimens include busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (Bu4/Cy2), busulfan plus fludarabine (Bu4/Flu). A modified Bu/Cy regimen is permitted for haploidentical transplantation. The specific regimen is selected according to institutional standard practice and study protocol.

    Procedure: MAC

  • Experimental
    RIC

    Reduced-intensity conditioning is administered prior to allogeneic peripheral-blood hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Acceptable regimens include fludarabine combined with busulfan (Flu/Bu2, Flu/Bu3), or fludarabine combined with melphalan (Flu/Mel). The specific regimen is selected according to institutional standard practice and study protocol.

    Procedure: RIC

Interventions

  • ProcedureRIC

    1. Flu/Bu2 or Flu/Bu3: The total dose of fludarabine is 120-180 mg/m², and the total intravenous dose of busulfan is 6.4-9.6 mg/kg. 2. Flu/Mel: The total dose of fludarabine is 120-180 mg/m², and the total dose of melphalan is 120-150 mg/m². For the purposes of this study, Flu/Bu3 is included in the RIC group as a protocol-specified reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen.

  • ProcedureMAC

    1. Bu4/Cy2: The total intravenous dose of busulfan is 12.8 mg/kg, and the total dose of cyclophosphamide is 120 mg/kg. 2. Bu4/Flu: The total intravenous dose of busulfan is 12.8 mg/kg, and the total dose of fludarabine is 120-180 mg/m². 3. Modified Bu/Cy regimen: For patients undergoing haploidentical transplantation, a modified Bu/Cy-based regimen incorporating cytarabine (Ara-C) could be used according to institutional protocols. The regimen consisted of Ara-C at a total dose of 4-8 g/m², intravenous busulfan at a total dose of 9.6 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide at a total dose of 3.6 g/m².

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS)

    Relapse-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until disease relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Patients who are alive without relapse will be censored at the date of last follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (OS)

    Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Patients alive at last follow-up will be censored.

    Time frame: 2 years after randomization

  2. Non-relapse mortality (NRM)

    Non-relapse mortality is defined as death without prior disease relapse. Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality will be estimated, with relapse treated as a competing risk.

    Time frame: 2 years after randomization

  3. Cumulative incidence of relapse

    Disease relapse defined as hematologic recurrence of FLT3-ITD mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Cumulative incidence of relapse will be estimated, with death without relapse treated as a competing risk.

    Time frame: 2 years after randomization

  4. GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS)

    GVHD-free, relapse-free survival is defined as time from randomization until grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression, leukemia relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: 2 years after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers. No supporting information will be made available.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Oct 2028, 23 months later.

Of 132 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, half reached primary completion within 49 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 128. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 139 studies reached it within 47 months; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 123.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2026
First posted
Oct 29, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2029
Last update
Nov 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 2 other changes: verification date and responsible party
  2. Oct 29, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07904884
Collaborators
Ruijin Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technolog, Peking University People's Hospital, Tongji Hospital
Responsible party
Yanmin Zhao (professor, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 29, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Yanmin Zhao, PhD
Contact
yanminzhao@zju.edu.cn
+8615858199217
YI YU, PhD
Contact
13840474475@163.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion