ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07902869W-ImRsUpdated Nov 5, 2026

Online Written Imagery Rescripting for Shame and Negative Self-Cognitions in Malaysian Adults With Childhood Emotional Neglect

An interventional study of Internet-Based Written Imagery Rescripting (W-ImRs) and Psychoeducation in Shame, Childhood Emotional Neglect and Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, sponsored by Taylor's University. Completed at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 58 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Taylor's University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 5, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 58 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an online written imagery rescripting program (W-ImRs) can reduce shame and negative beliefs about oneself in Malaysian adults aged 18 to 58 who experienced childhood emotional neglect.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does W-ImRs lower shame more than psychoeducation alone?
  2. Does W-ImRs lower negative beliefs about oneself more than psychoeducation alone?
  3. Do more people who receive W-ImRs show reliable and meaningful improvement than people who receive psychoeducation alone?

Researcher will compare W-ImRs to a single psychoeducation session to see if W-ImRs reduces shame and negative self-beliefs. Participants in the psychoeducation group will be offered W-ImRs after the study.

Participants will:

  1. Complete online questionnaires before and after the program
  2. Attend a live online psychoeducation session (about 60 minutes)
  3. If in the W-ImRs group, complete two written tasks about a painful childhood memory over about 4 weeks, receive written feedback from the therapist after each task, and attend a live online debriefing session (about 60 minutes)
Read the detailed description

This is a two-arm, parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial with a waitlist design. The intervention protocol is adapted from Wagner et al. (2022, 2024), and the rescripting procedure is aligned with the updated imagery rescripting protocol by Arntz (2025). The protocol is grounded in schema therapy.

The trial is open-label because the therapist, outcome assessor, and data analyst are the same person. Investigator bias is reduced through self-administered online instruments and standardized scoring.

All participants receive a Self-Help Kit with relaxation exercises, a crisis safety plan template, and Malaysian crisis contacts. Item 9 of the PHQ-9 is used as a suicidality checkpoint at pre and post-assessment, and the therapist reviews every written submission for signs of risk. Different safety protocol response is used for mild, moderate, and acute distress. Participants at acute risk are withdrawn on the same day and referred to clinical services. The therapist receives weekly supervision from the research supervisor throughout data collection.

Analyses will be performed in IBM SPSS Version 29 with significance set at α = .05. The main analysis is a 2 (Group) × 2 (Time) mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA on the EISS and PTCI-9 separately. Effect sizes will be reported as partial η² and Cohen's d. The Reliable Change Index (Jacobson \& Truax, 1991) will be used to identify participants whose change exceeds measurement error.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shame
  • Childhood Emotional Neglect
  • Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events

Keywords

  • Imagery Rescripting
  • Written Imagery Rescripting
  • Internet-Based Intervention
  • Negative Self-Cognitions
  • Childhood Maltreatment
  • Malaysia
  • Schema Therapy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Taylor's University is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 58 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Malaysian adult aged 18 to 58 years
  • History of childhood emotional neglect: defined as a score of 15 or above on the Emotional Neglect subscale of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire - Short Form (CTQ-SF)
  • Access to reliable internet connection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute suicidality at screening
  • Active psychosis
  • Currently receiving any other trauma-focused psychological therapy
  • Ongoing exposure to active abuse or violence
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    W-ImRs

    Participants receive psychoeducation followed by Internet-Based Written Imagery Rescripting (W-ImRs) over approximately 4 weeks.

    Behavioral: Internet-Based Written Imagery Rescripting (W-ImRs) · Behavioral: Psychoeducation

  • Active comparator
    Psychoeducation and Waitlist

    Participants receive a single psychoeducation session. They are offered the full W-ImRs intervention after completing the post-assessment.

    Behavioral: Psychoeducation

Interventions

  • BehavioralInternet-Based Written Imagery Rescripting (W-ImRs)

    A four-session protocol delivered over approximately 4 weeks. Session 1 is a live video session on Microsoft Teams (about 60 minutes) in which the psychoeducation session is extended to identify a target memory, explain the rationale for W-ImRs, and schedule the written sessions. Session 2 is an asynchronous writing task in a private Google Document: participants write a detailed first-person, present-tense account of the target memory and a letter to the person responsible for the memory. Session 3 is a second writing task: participants rescript the memory so that their adult self meets the child's unmet needs, and write a comforting letter to their younger self. The therapist gives written feedback after Sessions 2 and 3. Session 4 is a live debriefing session on Microsoft Teams (about 60 minutes).

  • BehavioralPsychoeducation

    A single live video session on Microsoft Teams (about 60 minutes) covering childhood emotional neglect, shame, and negative self-cognitions, with a verbal risk assessment. The shared psychoeducation content is identical across both arms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Shame on the External and Internal Shame Scale (EISS) at Post-Intervention

    The EISS is an 8-item self-report questionnaire measuring external and internal shame. Items are rated from 0 to 4, giving a total score from 0 to 32. Higher scores indicate greater shame.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Post-Intervention (Collected 3 days after each participant's final session)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Negative Self-Cognitions on the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory-9 (PTCI-9) at Post-Intervention

    The PTCI-9 is a 9-item self-report questionnaire measuring negative cognitions about the self, negative cognitions about the world, and self-blame. Items are rated from 1 to 7, giving a total score from 9 to 63. Higher scores indicate more negative cognitions.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Post-Intervention (Collected 3 days after each participant's final session)

  2. Number of Participants Showing Reliable Improvement in Shame on the EISS

    Reliable improvement is defined as a decrease in EISS total score from baseline to post-intervention with a Reliable Change Index (RCI) greater than 1.96 (Jacobson \& Truax, 1991). An RCI above 1.96 means there is 95% confidence that the decrease is a real change, and not due to chance or small day-to-day differences in how a person answers the questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Post-Intervention (Collected 3 days after each participant's final session)

  3. Number of Participants Showing Reliable Improvement in Negative Self-Cognitions on the PTCI-9

    Reliable improvement is defined as a decrease in PTCI-9 total score from baseline to post-intervention with a Reliable Change Index (RCI) greater than 1.96 (Jacobson \& Truax, 1991). An RCI above 1.96 means there is 95% confidence that the decrease is a real change, and not due to chance or small day-to-day differences in how a person answers the questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Post-Intervention (Collected 3 days after each participant's final session)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Taylor's University
    Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wagner B, Grafiadeli R, Martin T, Bohm M. Internet-based imagery rescripting intervention for adult survivors of institutional childhood abuse in the former German Democratic Republic - a pilot study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Sep 21;13(2):2117222. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2117222. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36186156 ↗
  • Wagner B, Schulz W, Knaevelsrud C. Efficacy of an Internet-based intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder in Iraq: a pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 2012 Jan 30;195(1-2):85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Aug 2. PubMed 21813187 ↗
  • Arntz A. Imagery Rescripting: an update of the treatment protocol. Behav Res Ther. 2025 Dec;195:104913. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104913. Epub 2025 Nov 10. PubMed 41270523 ↗
  • Wagner B, Bohm M, Grafiadeli R. Efficacy of an internet-based written imagery rescripting intervention for survivors of institutional childhood abuse - A randomized controlled trial. Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Jan;147:106557. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106557. Epub 2023 Nov 28. PubMed 38029559 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared. Participants disclosed sensitive information about childhood emotional neglect, and the informed consent form states that their data will not be shared with anyone other than the researcher and the research supervisor. Because of the small sample size, sharing individual data could also risk identifying participants. All data will be stored securely for at least three years after the study is completed and then permanently deleted.

09

Updates

3 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Nov 5, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 11, 2026→Nov 3, 2026 (actual)
Nov 5, 2026
Study completion
Nov 11, 2026→Nov 3, 2026 (actual)
Nov 5, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 3 updates
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Nov 11, 2026→Nov 3, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Nov 11, 2026→Nov 3, 2026 (now actual)
  2. Oct 30, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 2 other changes: responsible party and conditions
  3. Oct 29, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07902869
Lead sponsor
Taylor's University
Responsible party
Lee Thean Elaine (Principal Investigator, Taylor's University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 29, 2026
Start date
Sep 23, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 3, 2026
Completion
Nov 3, 2026
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Lee Thean Elaine
principal investigator · Taylor's University
Faeza Hasnan
study director · Taylor's University
Akif Basri
study director · Taylor's University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion