ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07902466Updated Oct 28, 2026

Short-Term Effects of Manual Therapy Prior to Neuromotor Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy

An interventional study of Manual Therapy (T1 & T3) in Cerebral Palsy (CP), Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy and Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by LIFE - Research and Care Institute - Santa Lucia IRCCS. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 12 Months to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by LIFE - Research and Care Institute - Santa Lucia IRCCS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Months to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot study aims to evaluate the immediate, short-term biomechanical and neuromuscular effects of lower limb manual therapy applied as a preparatory phase prior to functional neuromotor rehabilitation in children with spastic cerebral palsy (hemiplegic and diplegic forms). Using a prospective self-controlled design, 20 children will be assessed under four experimental conditions (baseline, post-manual therapy, post-functional therapy, and post-combined manual + functional therapy) to determine if manual techniques enhance gait parameters and motor execution.

Read the detailed description

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is the leading cause of permanent motor disability in childhood, frequently causing hypertonia, myofascial retractions, altered neuromuscular recruitment, and compromised gait function. Manual therapy techniques (myofascial release, joint mobilizations, passive stretching) have emerged as potential complementary interventions to reduce spasticity and improve joint mobility.

This monocentric prospective study investigates whether lower limb manual therapy immediately improves spatio-temporal parameters and quality of gait when used prior to functional neuromotor training. Twenty pediatric patients aged 12 months to 10 years with spastic CP (GMFCS I-IV) will be enrolled. Each participant serves as their own control. Assessments will occur at four time points with a 7-day wash-out period between sessions:

T0 (Baseline): Pre-treatment assessment (at least 48 hours after any previous rehabilitation session).

T1 (Post-Manual Therapy): Immediate evaluation following 30 minutes of targeted lower limb manual therapy.

T2 (Post-Functional Therapy): Immediate evaluation following 30 minutes of functional neuromotor therapy alone.

T3 (Post-Combined Therapy): Immediate evaluation following 30 minutes of manual therapy immediately followed by 30 minutes of functional neuromotor therapy.

Evaluations include instrumental Gait Analysis (spatiotemporal and kinematic/EMG parameters), Range of Motion (ROM) measurements, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88, Dimensions D and E).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy (CP)
  • Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy
  • Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy
  • Diplegic Cerebral Palsy With Spasticity
  • Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Manual Therapy
  • Pediatric Rehabilitation
  • Gait Analysis
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,898 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 439 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 33 across 1,399 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

LIFE - Research and Care Institute - Santa Lucia IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Months to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of spastic Cerebral Palsy with lower limb involvement (hemiplegia or diplegia).
  • Age between 12 months and 10 years.
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I, II, III, or IV.
  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≤ 3 in the lower limbs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Botulinum toxin injection in the lower limbs within the past 6 months.
  • Prior functional orthopedic or neurosurgical procedures on the lower limbs.
  • Concurrent participation in other experimental clinical studies involving the lower limbs.
  • Cognitive impairment preventing comprehension of required motor tasks.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    All Participants (Self-Controlled Experimental Conditions)

    Participants complete four distinct evaluation/intervention conditions (T0, T1, T2, T3) separated by a 7-day wash-out period.

    Other: Manual Therapy (T1 & T3)

Interventions

  • OtherManual Therapy (T1 & T3)

    Bilateral lower limb treatment including myofascial release on triceps surae, hamstrings, adductors, and iliopsoas; passive joint mobilizations; and selective muscle stretching.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Walking Speed via Instrumental Gait Analysis

    Evaluation of walking speed measured in meters per second (m/s) using 3D motion analysis systems.

    Time frame: Measured at T0 (Baseline, before intervention period), T1 (Immediate post-Manual Therapy, week 1), T2 (Immediate post-Functional Therapy, week 2), and T3 (Immediate post-Combined Therapy, week 3), over a total study duration of 4 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Step Length via Instrumental Gait Analysis

    Evaluation of step length measured in meters (m) using 3D motion analysis systems

    Time frame: Measured at T0 (Baseline, before intervention period), T1 (Immediate post-Manual Therapy, week 1), T2 (Immediate post-Functional Therapy, week 2), and T3 (Immediate post-Combined Therapy, week 3), over a total study duration of 4 weeks.

  2. Change in Cadence via Instrumental Gait Analysis

    Evaluation of cadence measured in steps per minute (steps/min) using 3D motion analysis systems

    Time frame: Measured at T0 (Baseline, before intervention period), T1 (Immediate post-Manual Therapy, week 1), T2 (Immediate post-Functional Therapy, week 2), and T3 (Immediate post-Combined Therapy, week 3), over a total study duration of 4 weeks

  3. Change in Double Support Time via Instrumental Gait Analysis

    Evaluation of double support time measured as a percentage of the gait cycle (% of gait cycle) using 3D motion analysis systems

    Time frame: Measured at T0 (Baseline, before intervention period), T1 (Immediate post-Manual Therapy, week 1), T2 (Immediate post-Functional Therapy, week 2), and T3 (Immediate post-Combined Therapy, week 3), over a total study duration of 4 weeks

  4. Change in Joint and Elevation Angles via Instrumental Gait Analysis

    Evaluation of joint angles, elevation angles, and foot lift measured in degrees using 3D motion analysis systems

    Time frame: Measured at T0 (Baseline, before intervention period), T1 (Immediate post-Manual Therapy, week 1), T2 (Immediate post-Functional Therapy, week 2), and T3 (Immediate post-Combined Therapy, week 3), over a total study duration of 4 weeks

  5. Change in Electromyographic (EMG) Activity Parameters

    Evaluation of center of activity of EMG signals, FWHM (full width at half maximum), coactivation index, and mean intensity of EMG signals using 3D motion analysis systems

    Time frame: Measured at T0 (Baseline, before intervention period), T1 (Immediate post-Manual Therapy, week 1), T2 (Immediate post-Functional Therapy, week 2), and T3 (Immediate post-Combined Therapy, week 3), over a total study duration of 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • LIFE - Istituto Ricerca e Cura e Santa Lucia IRCCS
    Roma, Roma 00179, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Chiara Fantini, PT · Contactc.fantini@hsantalucia.it · +39 0651501490
    • Chiara Fantini, PT · Principal investigator
    • Alessandra Medici, TNPEE · Principal investigator
    • Daniela Morelli, Dr · Sub investigator
    • Denise Cacciatore, Dr · Sub investigator
    • Donatella Mattia, Dr · Sub investigator
    • Ilaria Nicastro, PT · Sub investigator
    • Diego Piatti, PT · Sub investigator
    • Claudia De Angelis, TNPEE · Sub investigator
    • Priscilla Avaltroni, Eng · Principal investigator
    • Germana Cappellini, Eng · Principal investigator
    • Bianca Landolfo, Student, PT · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ko J, Kim M. Reliability and responsiveness of the gross motor function measure-88 in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2013 Mar;93(3):393-400. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110374. Epub 2012 Nov 8. PubMed 23139425 ↗
  • Shi X, Han J, Witchalls J, Waddington G, Adams R. Does treatment duration of manual therapy influence functional outcomes for individuals with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review with meta-analysis? Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Apr;40:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 7. PubMed 30753998 ↗
  • Keter DL, Bialosky JE, Brochetti K, Courtney CA, Funabashi M, Karas S, Learman K, Cook CE. The mechanisms of manual therapy: A living review of systematic, narrative, and scoping reviews. PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0319586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319586. eCollection 2025. PubMed 40100908 ↗
  • Kachmar O, Kushnir A, Matiushenko O, Hasiuk M. Influence of Spinal Manipulation on Muscle Spasticity and Manual Dexterity in Participants With Cerebral Palsy: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Chiropr Med. 2018 Sep;17(3):141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Aug 28. PubMed 30228805 ↗
  • Yanuck SB, Fox SK, Harting BR, Motyka TM. Effect of manual manipulation on mechanical gait parameters. J Osteopath Med. 2024 May 30;124(10):437-446. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0203. eCollection 2024 Oct 1. PubMed 38807459 ↗
  • Balthazard P, de Goumoens P, Rivier G, Demeulenaere P, Ballabeni P, Deriaz O. Manual therapy followed by specific active exercises versus a placebo followed by specific active exercises on the improvement of functional disability in patients with chronic non specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Aug 28;13:162. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-162. PubMed 22925609 ↗
  • Albright AL. Spasticity and movement disorders in cerebral palsy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 Oct;39(10):2877-2886. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-06045-5. Epub 2023 Jul 6. PubMed 37410128 ↗
  • BAX MC. TERMINOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION OF CEREBRAL PALSY. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1964 Jun;6:295-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1964.tb10791.x. No abstract available. PubMed 14155190 ↗
  • Youn PS, Cho KH, Park SJ. Changes in Ankle Range of Motion, Gait Function and Standing Balance in Children with Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy after Ankle Mobilization by Manual Therapy. Children (Basel). 2020 Sep 18;7(9):142. doi: 10.3390/children7090142. PubMed 32961844 ↗
  • Hansen AB, Price KS, Loi EC, Buysse CA, Jaramillo TM, Pico EL, Feldman HM. Gait changes following myofascial structural integration (Rolfing) observed in 2 children with cerebral palsy. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2014 Oct;19(4):297-300. doi: 10.1177/2156587214540466. Epub 2014 Jul 2. PubMed 24989994 ↗
  • Faccioli S, Pagliano E, Ferrari A, Maghini C, Siani MF, Sgherri G, Cappetta G, Borelli G, Farella GM, Foscan M, Vigano M, Sghedoni S, Perazza S, Sassi S. Evidence-based management and motor rehabilitation of cerebral palsy children and adolescents: a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2023 May 25;14:1171224. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1171224. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37305763 ↗
  • Chakraborty S, Nandy A, Kesar TM. Gait deficits and dynamic stability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Jan;71:11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 18. PubMed 31677546 ↗
  • Armand S, Decoulon G, Bonnefoy-Mazure A. Gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy. EFORT Open Rev. 2016 Dec 22;1(12):448-460. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000052. eCollection 2016 Dec. PubMed 28698802 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 2 months later.

Of 888 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cerebral Palsy, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 906 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 15, 2026
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 2027
Last update
Oct 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07902466
Lead sponsor
LIFE - Research and Care Institute - Santa Lucia IRCCS
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Study contacts

Chiara Fantini, PT
Contact
c.fantini@hsantalucia.it
+39 0651501490
Alessandra Medici, TNPEE
Contact
a.medici@hsantalucia.it

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion