ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07902427FOS-PROSTUpdated Oct 28, 2026

Oral Fosfomycin as Sequential Oral Treatment for Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia Coli in Acute Bacterial Prostatitis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fosfomycin Trometamol Salt and control group in Prostatitis and Escherichia Coli Infection, sponsored by Hospital Mutua de Terrassa. Completed at 7 sites in Spain. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by Hospital Mutua de Terrassa · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

FOS-PROST was a prospective, non-randomized, controlled phase IV clinical trial designed to evaluate the clinical and microbiological efficacy of oral fosfomycin trometamol as sequential antibiotic therapy in patients with acute bacterial prostatitis caused by multidrug-resistant *Escherichia coli*.

According to the study protocol, patients with multidrug-resistant *E. coli* were assigned to receive oral fosfomycin trometamol, whereas patients with non-multidrug-resistant *E. coli* were assigned to receive conventional oral antibiotic treatment with ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, according to antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

All patients received 1 to 5 days of appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy before switching to oral treatment. Fosfomycin trometamol was administered at a standard dose of 3 g once daily. The planned total duration of antibiotic treatment was 21 days in both groups, including intravenous and oral therapy.

During study conduct, some patients with non-multidrug-resistant *E. coli* also received fosfomycin. All patients with multidrug-resistant *E. coli* received fosfomycin.

Clinical and microbiological outcomes were compared between treatment groups. Secondary objectives included evaluating carbapenem consumption, hospital length of stay, safety, recurrence, and fosfomycin pharmacokinetics.

Read the detailed description

Acute bacterial prostatitis caused by multidrug-resistant *Escherichia coli* represents a therapeutic challenge because resistance to commonly used oral antibiotics limits treatment options and may increase the need for prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy.

FOS-PROST was a multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, controlled phase IV clinical trial investigating oral fosfomycin trometamol as sequential antibiotic treatment for acute bacterial prostatitis caused by multidrug-resistant *E. coli*.

Eligible adult male patients with microbiologically confirmed acute bacterial prostatitis caused by *E. coli* were enrolled. All participants received 1 to 5 days of appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy before switching to oral treatment, once clinical stability and the conditions for oral sequential therapy had been achieved.

According to the study protocol, patients with multidrug-resistant *E. coli* were assigned to receive oral fosfomycin trometamol at a standard dose of 3 g every 24 hours. Patients with non-multidrug-resistant *E. coli* were assigned to receive conventional oral antibiotic therapy with ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, according to antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

The planned total duration of antibiotic treatment was 21 days in both groups, including intravenous and oral therapy.

During study conduct, some patients with non-multidrug-resistant *E. coli* received oral fosfomycin rather than conventional oral antibiotic therapy. All patients with multidrug-resistant *E. coli* received fosfomycin.

The study evaluated clinical cure and microbiological cure as separate efficacy outcomes. Secondary outcomes included recurrence, adverse events, carbapenem consumption, hospital length of stay, and fosfomycin pharmacokinetics.

The statistical analysis included a comparison according to the treatment actually received (as-treated analysis) and a per-protocol analysis excluding patients who did not meet the protocol-defined treatment allocation criteria.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostatitis
  • Escherichia Coli Infection

Keywords

  • Multi-drug resistance
  • Sequential oral treatment
  • Fosfomycin
  • Acute bacterial prostatitis
  • Escherichia coli
03

In context

Prostatitis

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatitis; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is above the median of 60 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Prostatitis.

Browse Prostatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Mutua de Terrassa is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

**Inclusion Criteria:**

Male patients aged 18 years or older with febrile acute bacterial prostatitis (temperature >37.5°C) caused by Escherichia coli.

Diagnosis required a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >4 μg/L, at least one microbiological criterion, and at least two clinical criteria as specified below.

**Microbiological Criteria (at least one required):**

  1. Urine culture yielding >100,000 CFU/mL of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli for the experimental group or non-MDR E. coli for the control group, with a fosfomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤32 mg/L in both groups.
  2. Positive blood culture for MDR E. coli in the experimental group or non-MDR E. coli in the control group, with a fosfomycin MIC ≤32 mg/L in both groups, accompanied by clinical signs of sepsis without another evident or probable source of bacteremia and pyuria (≥10 leukocytes/mm³ or positive leukocyte esterase on urine dipstick).

**Clinical criteria (at least two required):**

  1. Lower urinary tract symptoms:

    • Irritative symptoms: urinary urgency, increased urinary frequency, dysuria, or tenesmus.
    • Obstructive symptoms: difficulty initiating urination, decreased urinary stream, postvoid residual urine, or acute urinary retention.
  2. Perineal pain, spontaneous or associated with urination:

    • Pain involving the suprapubic, perineal, lumbosacral, scrotal, penile, or inner thigh regions.
    • Enlarged, warm, or tender prostate on digital rectal examination.
  3. History of prostatic disease (prostate cancer or benign prostatic hyperplasia) associated with:

    • Recent urinary tract instrumentation.
    • Recent transrectal prostate (\<7 days).
    • Altered level of consciousness in patients older than 70 years without another apparent cause.

**Exclusion Criteria:**

  1. Known allergy or intolerance to fosfomycin.
  2. Polymicrobial bacteremia or polymicrobial urine culture.
  3. Clinical evidence of acute pyelonephritis, including costovertebral angle tenderness, urinary tract obstruction, or renal abscess.
  4. Anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract.
  5. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection.
  6. Undrained prostatic abscess.
  7. Another concomitant infection.
  8. Failure to achieve clinical stability after five days of parenteral antibiotic treatment.
  9. Septic shock at the time of treatment allocation.
  10. Polycystic kidney disease.
  11. History of chronic prostatitis.
  12. Recurrent acute bacterial prostatitis, defined as two or more episodes during the preceding year or one episode during the preceding six months.
  13. , including kidney transplantation, liver cirrhosis, renal replacement therapy, chronic treatment, active chemotherapy, or anti-TNF therapy.
  14. Terminal illness, estimated of less than 90 days, or exclusive palliative care.
  15. Participation in another clinical trial involving active treatment.
  16. Fosfomycin MIC exceeding the susceptibility threshold specified in the study inclusion criteria.
  17. Refusal to provide .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group

    Adult male patients with acute bacterial prostatitis caused by multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, according to the Magiorakos criteria, assigned to receive sequential oral fosfomycin trometamol at a standard dose of 3 g every 24 hours after 1 to 5 days of appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy.

    Drug: Fosfomycin Trometamol Salt

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Adult male patients with acute bacterial prostatitis caused by non-multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, assigned to receive sequential oral antibiotic treatment with ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, according to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, after 1 to 5 days of appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy.

    Drug: control group

Interventions

  • Oral fosfomycin trometamol, 3 g every 24 hours, administered as sequential antibiotic therapy after 1 to 5 days of appropriate intravenous antibiotic treatment, once clinical stability and oral tolerance were achieved. The planned total duration of antibiotic treatment, including intravenous and oral therapy, was 21 days. Dose adjustments for renal impairment were specified in the protocol.

    Also known as: J01XX01 - FOSFOMICINA

  • Drugcontrol group

    Oral ciprofloxacin, 500 mg every 12 hours, administered as sequential antibiotic therapy according to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, following 1 to 5 days of appropriate intravenous antibiotic treatment. The planned total duration of antibiotic therapy was 21 days.

  • Drugcontrol group

    Oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 160 mg/800 mg every 12 hours, administered as sequential antibiotic therapy according to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, following 1 to 5 days of appropriate intravenous antibiotic treatment. The planned total duration of antibiotic therapy was 21 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure

    Clinical cure was defined as the resolution of all symptoms present at baseline without the need for additional antibiotic treatment. Clinical cure required the absence of fever (axillary temperature greater than 38°C), urinary symptoms (dysuria, urinary frequency, urgency, or suprapubic pain), and altered level of consciousness if present at baseline.

    Time frame: Day 21 ± 3 days from treatment initiation (end of treatment)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Cure

    Microbiological cure was defined as a negative urine culture at the end of antibiotic treatment. Only participants with an available urine culture at the end-of-treatment assessment were included in the analysis of this outcome. Participants without an available urine culture were excluded from the microbiological cure analysis.

    Time frame: Day 21 ± 3 days from treatment initiation (end of treatment).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Estimated Carbapenem Defined Daily Doses (DDDs) Avoided per Patient

    The potential carbapenem-sparing effect of sequential oral fosfomycin trometamol was estimated in patients with acute bacterial prostatitis caused by multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Assuming that these patients would otherwise have received intravenous ertapenem until completion of the planned 21-day antibiotic course, the number of potentially avoided ertapenem Defined Daily Doses (DDDs) was calculated based on the remaining treatment duration after switching to oral fosfomycin. Results were expressed as estimated DDDs avoided per patient.

    Time frame: During the 21-day antibiotic treatment period.

  2. Hospital Length of Stay in Days

    Hospital length of stay was assessed as the number of days of actual hospital admission during the acute bacterial prostatitis episode and compared between the fosfomycin and control group. In accordance with the study protocol, patients with hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infection were excluded from this analysis

    Time frame: During the hospital admission for the acute bacterial prostatitis episode.

  3. Estimated Hospitalization Days Avoided per Patient

    The potential reduction in hospital or hospital-at-home admission days associated with sequential oral fosfomycin trometamol was estimated among patients receiving oral fosfomycin. Assuming that these patients would otherwise have required continued parenteral antibiotic therapy during hospital or hospital-at-home admission, the number of potentially avoided admission days was estimated from the remaining days of the planned 21-day antibiotic treatment course after switching to oral fosfomycin. Results were expressed as estimated admission days avoided per patient.

    Time frame: During the 21-day antibiotic treatment period

  4. Plasma Fosfomycin Concentration

    Plasma fosfomycin concentrations (mg/L) were planned to be measured using blood samples collected at predefined time points after oral fosfomycin trometamol administration in selected participants at the coordinating center. The planned pharmacokinetic assessment was not performed, and no plasma fosfomycin concentration data were collected.

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 hours after the first oral fosfomycin dose; additional trough concentrations during hospitalization or at Visit 4, as applicable.

  5. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events

    The incidence and severity of adverse events were assessed in patients receiving sequential oral fosfomycin trometamol or conventional oral antibiotic therapy. Adverse events were recorded during antibiotic treatment and subsequent follow-up through Day 51 (± 7 days) from treatment initiation. Results were expressed as the number and percentage of participants experiencing adverse events in each treatment group, with assessment of their severity.

    Time frame: From treatment initiation through Day 51 (± 7 days).

  6. Acute Bacterial Prostatitis-Related Mortality

    Mortality related to the acute bacterial prostatitis episode was assessed in both treatment groups. The outcome was measured as the number and percentage of participants who died from causes attributable to the acute bacterial prostatitis episode during the study observation period.

    Time frame: From treatment initiation through Day 51 (± 7 days).

  7. Incidence of Acute Bacterial Prostatitis Recurrence

    The incidence of acute bacterial prostatitis relapse or reinfection was assessed prospectively during the protocol-defined follow-up period. Relapse was defined as recurrence of urinary tract infection symptoms with isolation of the same microorganism, whereas reinfection was defined as recurrence of symptoms with isolation of a different bacterial strain. Results were expressed as the number and percentage of participants experiencing relapse or reinfection in each treatment group.

    Time frame: From completion of antibiotic treatment through Day 51 (± 7 days) from treatment initiation.

  8. Incidence of Emergent Fosfomycin Resistance

    The emergence of fosfomycin resistance was planned to be assessed through microbiological susceptibility testing during treatment and follow-up in participants receiving oral fosfomycin trometamol. This assessment was not performed, and no data on emergent fosfomycin resistance were collected.

    Time frame: From treatment initiation through Day 51 (± 7 days).

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Hospital del Mar
    Barcelona, Barcelona 08003, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí
    Sabadell, Barcelona 08208, Spain
  • Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi
    Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona 08970, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa
    Terrassa, Barcelona 08221, Spain
  • Hospital de Terrassa
    Terrassa, Catalonia 08227, Spain
  • Clínica Universidad de Navarra
    Pamplona, Navarre 31008, Spain
  • Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
    Vigo, Pontevedra 36312, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rodriguez-Bano J, Pascual A. Clinical significance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008 Oct;6(5):671-83. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.5.671. PubMed 18847405 ↗
  • Hernandez JR, Martinez-Martinez L, Canton R, Coque TM, Pascual A; Spanish Group for Nosocomial Infections (GEIH). Nationwide study of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 May;49(5):2122-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.2122-2125.2005. PubMed 15855544 ↗
  • Boix-Palop L, Xercavins M, Badia C, Obradors M, Riera M, Freixas N, Perez J, Rodriguez-Carballeira M, Garau J, Calbo E. Emerging extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae causing community-onset urinary tract infections: a case-control-control study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Aug;50(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 May 24. PubMed 28552471 ↗
  • Tzouvelekis LS, Markogiannakis A, Psichogiou M, Tassios PT, Daikos GL. Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: an evolving crisis of global dimensions. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012 Oct;25(4):682-707. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05035-11. PubMed 23034326 ↗
  • Falagas ME, Maraki S, Karageorgopoulos DE, Kastoris AC, Mavromanolakis E, Samonis G. Antimicrobial susceptibility of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Enterobacteriaceae isolates to fosfomycin. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Mar;35(3):240-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.10.019. PubMed 20034765 ↗
  • de Cueto M, Lopez L, Hernandez JR, Morillo C, Pascual A. In vitro activity of fosfomycin against extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: comparison of susceptibility testing procedures. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jan;50(1):368-70. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.1.368-370.2006. PubMed 16377714 ↗
  • Falagas ME, Kastoris AC, Kapaskelis AM, Karageorgopoulos DE. Fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing, Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;10(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70325-1. PubMed 20129148 ↗
  • Michalopoulos AS, Livaditis IG, Gougoutas V. The revival of fosfomycin. Int J Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;15(11):e732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Sep 25. PubMed 21945848 ↗
  • Raz R. Fosfomycin: an old--new antibiotic. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Jan;18(1):4-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03636.x. Epub 2011 Sep 13. PubMed 21914036 ↗
  • Roussos N, Karageorgopoulos DE, Samonis G, Falagas ME. Clinical significance of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fosfomycin for the treatment of patients with systemic infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Dec;34(6):506-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.08.013. Epub 2009 Oct 13. PubMed 19828298 ↗
  • Parker SL, Frantzeskaki F, Wallis SC, Diakaki C, Giamarellou H, Koulenti D, Karaiskos I, Lipman J, Dimopoulos G, Roberts JA. Population Pharmacokinetics of Fosfomycin in Critically Ill Patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Oct;59(10):6471-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01321-15. Epub 2015 Aug 3. PubMed 26239990 ↗
  • Gardiner BJ, Mahony AA, Ellis AG, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton DM, Zeglinski PT, Frauman AG, Grayson ML. Is fosfomycin a potential treatment alternative for multidrug-resistant gram-negative prostatitis? Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;58(4):e101-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit704. Epub 2013 Oct 28. PubMed 24170195 ↗
  • Rosso-Fernandez C, Sojo-Dorado J, Barriga A, Lavin-Alconero L, Palacios Z, Lopez-Hernandez I, Merino V, Camean M, Pascual A, Rodriguez-Bano J; FOREST Study Group. Fosfomycin versus meropenem in bacteraemic urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (FOREST): study protocol for an investigator-driven randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 31;5(3):e007363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007363. PubMed 25829373 ↗
  • Grayson ML, Macesic N, Trevillyan J, Ellis AG, Zeglinski PT, Hewitt NH, Gardiner BJ, Frauman AG. Fosfomycin for Treatment of Prostatitis: New Tricks for Old Dogs. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 1;61(7):1141-3. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ436. Epub 2015 Jun 10. PubMed 26063723 ↗
  • Los-Arcos I, Pigrau C, Rodriguez-Pardo D, Fernandez-Hidalgo N, Andreu A, Larrosa N, Almirante B. Long-Term Fosfomycin-Tromethamine Oral Therapy for Difficult-To-Treat Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Dec 14;60(3):1854-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02611-15. PubMed 26666924 ↗
  • Oteo J, Bautista V, Lara N, Cuevas O, Arroyo M, Fernandez S, Lazaro E, de Abajo FJ, Campos J; Spanish ESBL-EARS-Net Study Group. Parallel increase in community use of fosfomycin and resistance to fosfomycin in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65(11):2459-63. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq346. Epub 2010 Sep 16. PubMed 20851815 ↗
  • Kyung YS, Lee HC, Kim HJ. Changes in serum prostate-specific antigen after treatment with antibiotics in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostatitis. Int Neurourol J. 2010 Aug;14(2):100-4. doi: 10.5213/inj.2010.14.2.100. Epub 2010 Aug 31. PubMed 21120219 ↗
  • Hedelin H, Johansson N, Stroberg P. Relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms and correlation between prostate volume and serum prostate-specific antigen in clinical routine. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(2):154-9. doi: 10.1080/00365590510007685. PubMed 16019770 ↗
  • Ulleryd P, Sandberg T. Ciprofloxacin for 2 or 4 weeks in the treatment of febrile urinary tract infection in men: a randomized trial with a 1 year follow-up. Scand J Infect Dis. 2003;35(1):34-9. doi: 10.1080/0036554021000026988. PubMed 12685882 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07902427
Lead sponsor
Hospital Mutua de Terrassa
Collaborators
Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Hospital del Mar, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Jan 25, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 18, 2026
Completion
Jun 30, 2026
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fosfomycin

Start the discussion