ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07269015Updated Dec 8, 2025

CGM Accuracy in Pregnancy Study

An interventional study of Dexcom One Plus and FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus in Pregestational Diabetes and Continuous Glucose Monitoring, sponsored by Hospital Mutua de Terrassa. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-08.

Sponsored by Hospital Mutua de Terrassa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Pregnancy in women with diabetes remains a high-risk condition, requiring strict glycemic control due to rapid physiological changes that affect insulin sensitivity. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides detailed glucose trends, but the accuracy of newer, affordable systems such as Dexcom One Plus and FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus has not been evaluated during pregnancy.

This prospective interventional study aims to compare the accuracy of these two CGM systems-both worn simultaneously-using capillary glucose as the reference. The study also evaluates educational needs, skills, attitudes, digital competence, lifestyle habits, and patient-reported outcomes among pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (T1D), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and gestational diabetes (GDM).

Read the detailed description

Women with diabetes during pregnancy experience increased risks of congenital malformations, neonatal morbidity, hypertensive disorders, and abnormal fetal growth. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic outcomes in type 1 diabetes (T1D) in pregnancy, yet evidence remains limited for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and gestational diabetes (GDM). Dexcom One Plus and FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus are recent low-cost systems with CE-mark approval for use in pregnancy, both with reported Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) values around 8%. However, neither system has been specifically validated in pregnant populations.

Physiological changes in pregnancy-including increased total body water and interstitial fluid-may alter CGM accuracy. Prior studies show that earlier FreeStyle Libre versions may overestimate hypoglycemia in pregnant women. Furthermore, women with T2D or GDM typically have little prior exposure to diabetes education or CGM technology, which may contribute to suboptimal glycemic control.

This study evaluates the accuracy and usability of Dexcom One Plus and FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus during pregnancy, while also assessing educational and digital literacy needs to optimize CGM implementation in real-world clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregestational Diabetes
  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Keywords

  • type 2 diabetes
  • continuous glucose monitoring
  • pregnancy
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

10,371 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,406 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 66 is below the median of 80 across 8,350 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Mutua de Terrassa is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, or gestational diabetes, diagnosed before 32 weeks of gestation
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Willingness to wear two CGM systems simultaneously
  • Possession of a smartphone compatible with LibreLink
  • Ability to sign

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Comorbidities affecting glucose metabolism
  • Inability to use CGM devices or perform capillary glucose testing
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
66 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dual Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use

    All participants will wear two continuous glucose monitoring sensors simultaneously

    Device: Dexcom One Plus · Device: FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus · Procedure: Additional Study Procedures

Interventions

  • DeviceDexcom One Plus

    Worn on the upper arm for 10 days Two replacements during the 30-day study period Used with Dexcom mobile application

  • DeviceFreeStyle Libre 2 Plus

    Worn on the opposite arm for 15 days One replacement during the 30-day study period Used as real-time CGM via LibreLink

  • ProcedureAdditional Study Procedures

    Capillary glucose monitoring before meals, 1 hour postprandially, and during symptoms of hypoglycemia (Contour Instant) One baseline structured education session for participants without prior CGM experience Routine diabetes education according to national guidelines

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD)

    Difference between paired continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) readings (Dexcom One Plus vs. FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus) and reference capillary glucose values.

    Time frame: End of 30-day monitoring period; Primary outcome

  2. Baseline diabetes knowledge, skills, and attitudes

    For the baseline evaluation, a specific questionnaire for the present study was administered, and the Spanish version of the Cambados Questionnaire will also be used. The Cambados Questionnaire is a 5-item questionnaire designed to assess digital competence. The score range is from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater digital competence.

    Time frame: Baseline (first study visit)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) for glucose <70 mg/dL

    \|Difference\| between paired values.

    Time frame: End of 30-day monitoring period

  2. Agreement rates (15/15%, 20/20%, 40/40%) across glucose ranges

    Categories: \<63, 63-140, \<70, 70-180, \>140, \>180 mg/dL.

    Time frame: End of 30-day monitoring period

  3. Dietary habits (Mediterranean diet adherence)

    The Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) will be used to evaluate adherence to the Mediterranean diet using a 17-item dietary assessment (score range: 0-17). Higher scores indicate greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet.

    Time frame: Baseline and End of 30-day monitoring period

  4. Physical activity

    Physical activity will be assessed by steps per day (measured as total steps) and using the reduced version of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ). The reported time spent in each activity category will be multiplied by the established categorical intensity value (METs) associated with that question. The total weekly physical activity level (MET-minutes/week or MET-hours/week) will be calculated by summing the MET values for each item, allowing for classification by intensity (sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous)

    Time frame: 7 days before baseline and through study completion, an average of 1 week

  5. Sleep quality

    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI is a 19-item, self-rated questionnaire designed to measure sleep quality and disturbance. Sleep component scores will be summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 1 week

  6. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs)

    The Glucose Monitoring System Satisfaction Survey (GMSS) will be used to assess patients' satisfaction with their continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system. GMSS is a 15-item questionnaire with a score range of 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Driesman AS, Konopka JA, Feder O, Aggarwal V, Schwarzkopf R. Management Principles of Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty A Review of the Literature. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2023 Mar;81(1):4-10. PubMed 36821729 ↗
  • Dai J, Liu D, Yin X, Wen X, Cai G, Zheng L. Anisotropic Elastomer Ionomer Composite-Based Strain Sensors: Achieving High Sensitivity and Wide Detection for Human Motion Detection and Wireless Transmission. ACS Sens. 2024 Apr 26;9(4):2156-2165. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.4c00274. Epub 2024 Apr 17. PubMed 38629405 ↗
  • Lin S, Pan X, Meng D, Zhang T. Electric conversion treatment of cobalt-containing wastewater. Water Sci Technol. 2021 Apr;83(8):1973-1986. doi: 10.2166/wst.2021.101. PubMed 33905366 ↗
  • Kawada T. Psychosocial factors and mortality in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;20(8):1243. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1208. Epub 2018 Apr 24. No abstract available. PubMed 29693755 ↗
  • Murphy HR, Howgate C, O'Keefe J, Myers J, Morgan M, Coleman MA, Jolly M, Valabhji J, Scott EM, Knighton P, Young B, Lewis-Barned N; National Pregnancy in Diabetes (NPID) advisory group. Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes: a 5-year national population-based cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Mar;9(3):153-164. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30406-X. Epub 2021 Jan 28. PubMed 33516295 ↗
  • Simmons D, Immanuel J, Hague WM, Teede H, Nolan CJ, Peek MJ, Flack JR, McLean M, Wong V, Hibbert E, Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Backman H, Gianatti E, Sweeting A, Mohan V, Enticott J, Cheung NW; TOBOGM Research Group. Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed Early in Pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 8;388(23):2132-2144. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2214956. Epub 2023 May 5. PubMed 37144983 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2025; primary completion for Dec 2026, 12 months later.

Of 2,066 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,243 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 19, 2025
First posted
Dec 8, 2025
StartEst.
Dec 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 2027
Last update
Dec 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07269015
Lead sponsor
Hospital Mutua de Terrassa
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 8, 2025
Start date
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 8, 2025

Study contacts

Verónica Perea, MD, PhD
Contact
vperea@mutuaterrassa.cat
0043937 36 50 50 ext. 11330

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion