ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07900503Updated Oct 28, 2026

Safety and Feasibility of NRICM301 Added to Usual Care for Adults With Acute Ischemic Stroke

An interventional study of NRICM301 and Placebo in Acute Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by En Chu Kong Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by En Chu Kong Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute ischemic stroke occurs when blood flow to part of the brain is blocked. This study will assess the safety and feasibility of adding NRICM301, a food-grade formula also called Taiwan Xingnao No. 1, to usual care for adults with acute ischemic stroke.

The study plans to enroll 45 participants at En Chu Kong Hospital in Taiwan. Participants will be assigned by chance in a 1:1 ratio to receive NRICM301 or a similar-looking placebo drink for 14 days, in addition to usual stroke care. Each dose is 100 mL, taken twice daily by mouth or through a nasogastric feeding tube. The first dose will be given within 24 hours after arrival at the hospital. Participants and study personnel who assess outcomes will not know which drink participants receive.

The main question is whether the proportion of participants experiencing adverse events differs between the two groups from the first dose through the 90-day follow-up visit. Blood tests, stroke severity, disability, ability to perform daily activities, hospital and intensive care use, and inflammatory markers will also be evaluated. This exploratory study is intended to identify safety signals and estimate changes that can help plan a larger study; it is not designed to establish definitive treatment effectiveness.

Read the detailed description

This single-center exploratory feasibility trial evaluates the integration of NRICM301 into standard care for acute ischemic stroke. An independent staff member who does not participate in recruitment, administration, or assessment will generate a randomized allocation sequence using randomly mixed block sizes of four and six. Allocation will be concealed, and study products will have identical packaging labeled with participant numbers. Individual allocation envelopes will be held separately for emergency unblinding when knowledge of treatment assignment is essential for urgent medical management.

Recruitment will take place through the emergency department after necessary acute medical care has been provided and vital signs are stable. The consent process will be conducted by study personnel separate from the physician providing frontline emergency care. Participants or their legally authorized representatives will receive at least 20 minutes to consider participation. Participants who regain decision-making capacity after representative consent will be asked to provide their own written consent.

All participants will continue standard stroke care. Product use will be recorded during hospitalization and after discharge. Telephone reminders, dosing records, and returned unused product will support adherence assessment. If an in-person 90-day visit is not possible, functional assessments may be conducted by telephone, with the assessment method documented.

The safety analysis set includes randomized participants who receive at least one dose. The modified intention-to-treat set includes randomized participants who receive at least one dose and have at least one post-baseline neurological, functional, or inflammatory-marker assessment. The per-protocol set requires completion of the 14-day intervention, at least 80% overall adherence, the final follow-up assessment, and no major protocol deviation. Analyses will emphasize descriptive statistics, effect estimates, and 95% confidence intervals. Secondary comparisons are exploratory, and no adjustment for multiple comparisons is planned. Missing values will not be imputed; the longitudinal NIHSS analysis will use available observations.

An internal safety group led by the principal investigator and co-investigators will review safety data at least quarterly. No independent data monitoring committee is planned. Prespecified individual stopping thresholds and trial suspension rules address coagulation abnormalities, severe bleeding, severe liver injury, and other serious safety concerns. Blood samples will be used only for the planned study tests and will not be retained for unrelated future research.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • NRICM301
  • Taiwan Xingnao No. 1
  • acute ischemic stroke
  • Chinese medicine
  • integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine care
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 120 across 1,776 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

En Chu Kong Hospital is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female adults aged 20 years or older at screening.
  • Acute ischemic stroke diagnosed by a clinician based on clinical assessment and imaging findings, with a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 5 to 22.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receipt of, or planned treatment with, mechanical thrombectomy or intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA); or use within 7 days before screening or current use of other Chinese herbal medicines, including single-herb or compound preparations, herbal injections, and concentrated herbal preparations; supplements primarily containing herbs that may affect coagulation or function, such as Dan Shen, ginkgo leaf, Dang Gui, turmeric, or St. John's wort; or specified dietary supplements, including fish oil/omega-3 at more than 2 g/day, vitamin E at more than 400 IU/day, or garlic extract.
  • Another stroke within the 7 days preceding the current stroke onset, postoperative stroke, stroke due to a rare cause, or a pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale score of 4 or higher.
  • Imaging evidence of intracranial hemorrhage or another non-ischemic intracranial lesion; a cerebral arteriovenous malformation with high bleeding risk; a history of abnormal bleeding or a bleeding disorder; or abnormal coagulation function.
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment as determined by a physician.
  • Current pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Inability to accept an intervention containing animal-derived ingredients.
  • Known allergy to Chi Shao, Chuan Xiong, Hong Qi, or fish ingredients in NRICM301.
  • Participation within 3 months before screening in another interventional clinical trial involving a drug, biological product, herbal medicine, or nutritional supplement with systemic physiological effects. Participation in a noninvasive medical device study, such as a blood pressure monitor or wearable monitoring device study, may be permitted after principal investigator assessment. Participation in a purely behavioral intervention, health education, psychological assessment, or cognitive training study may also be permitted if it does not affect this study's outcomes or increase participant risk.
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with study procedures.
  • Unwillingness or inability of the participant or a legally authorized representative to provide written .
  • Any other condition that may affect safety, clinical assessment, or interpretation of the study results, or that makes participation inappropriate in the investigator's clinical judgment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NRICM301 Plus Standard Care

    Participants will receive NRICM301, 100 mL per dose (two 50-mL sachets), twice daily in the morning and evening for 14 consecutive days, orally or through a nasogastric feeding tube. The first dose will be administered within 24 hours after hospital arrival. Standard acute ischemic stroke care will continue throughout participation.

    Dietary Supplement: NRICM301

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Plus Standard Care

    Participants will receive a placebo drink resembling NRICM301 in appearance, color, and smell, 100 mL per dose (two 50-mL sachets), twice daily in the morning and evening for 14 consecutive days, orally or through a nasogastric feeding tube. The first dose will be administered within 24 hours after hospital arrival. Standard acute ischemic stroke care will continue throughout participation.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementNRICM301

    A food-grade formula containing Chi Shao, Chuan Xiong, Hong Qi, and eel, supplied in opaque 50-mL foil sachets. The dose is 100 mL (two sachets) twice daily, for a total of 200 mL daily, for 14 consecutive days. Administration is oral or through a nasogastric feeding tube. The first dose is given within 24 hours after hospital arrival. Ingredient proportions are proprietary. The product is supplied by the National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare.

  • OtherPlacebo

    A placebo drink resembling NRICM301 in appearance, color, and smell, supplied in the same packaging. The dose is 100 mL (two 50-mL sachets) twice daily for 14 consecutive days, orally or through a nasogastric feeding tube. The first dose is given within 24 hours after hospital arrival. The placebo is supplied by the National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event

    Percentage of participants in the safety analysis set who experience at least one adverse event after the first dose of study product through the final follow-up visit. An adverse event is an unfavorable medical occurrence regardless of its causal relationship to the study product. The safety analysis set includes randomized participants who receive at least one dose. Event severity and relationship to the study product will also be summarized, and incidence will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: From the first dose through Day 90 (plus or minus 7 days)

  2. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Study Product-Related Adverse Reaction

    Percentage of participants in the safety analysis set who experience at least one adverse reaction judged by the investigator to be related to the study product, from the first dose through the final follow-up visit. Causality is assessed using the protocol categories of not related, probably not related, possible, probable, and definite. Incidence will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: From the first dose through Day 90 (plus or minus 7 days).

  3. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event

    Percentage of participants in the safety analysis set who experience at least one serious adverse event from the first dose through the final follow-up visit. Serious adverse events include death, life-threatening events, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, persistent disability or loss of function, congenital anomalies, or other medically important events. Incidence will be compared between groups regardless of causality.

    Time frame: From the first dose through Day 90 (plus or minus 7 days).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score

    Change in NIHSS total score from the pre-intervention baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. NIHSS scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurological impairment. Change is calculated as the follow-up score minus the baseline score; a negative change indicates improvement. Baseline assessment is performed at screening before study product administration.

    Time frame: Baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  2. Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale Score

    Change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score from the pre-dose baseline at Visit 2 to the final follow-up, compared between groups. The mRS ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. Change is calculated as the follow-up score minus the baseline score; negative, zero, and positive changes indicate improvement, no change, and worsening, respectively. Assessment may be conducted by telephone if an in-person visit is not possible.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Day 90 (plus or minus 7 days).

  3. Change From Baseline in Barthel Index Score

    Change in Barthel Index score from the pre-dose baseline at Visit 2 to the final follow-up, compared between groups. The index assesses independence in activities of daily living, with higher scores indicating greater independence. Change is calculated as the follow-up score minus the baseline score; positive, zero, and negative changes indicate improvement, no change, and worsening, respectively. Assessment may be conducted by telephone if an in-person visit is not possible.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Day 90 (plus or minus 7 days).

  4. Hospital Length of Stay

    Number of days spent in hospital during the study observation period, compared between groups. Hospital stays and reasons for readmission will be recorded at follow-up visits.

    Time frame: Through Day 90 (plus or minus 7 days); reviewed at Days 7, 14, and 90.

  5. Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay

    Number of days spent in an intensive care unit during the study observation period, compared between groups. Intensive care admissions and their reasons will be recorded at follow-up visits.

    Time frame: Through Day 90 (plus or minus 7 days); reviewed at Days 7, 14, and 90.

  6. Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 Concentration

    Change in blood interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentration from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up concentration minus the baseline concentration. Samples will be analyzed by the National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  7. Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Concentration

    Change in blood tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) concentration from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up concentration minus the baseline concentration. Samples will be analyzed by the National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  8. Change From Baseline of Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

    Change in Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14). from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  9. Change From Baseline in Prothrombin Time

    Change in prothrombin time (PT) from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  10. Change From Baseline in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

    Change in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  11. Change From Baseline in International Normalized Ratio

    Change in prothrombin time international normalized ratio (INR), a dimensionless measure, from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  12. Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase

    Change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  13. Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase | Change in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) from

    Change in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  14. Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen

    Change in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  15. Change From Baseline in Creatinine

    Change in creatinine from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  16. Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose

    Change in blood glucose from the pre-dose baseline to each follow-up assessment, compared between groups. Change is calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Hemorrhagic Transformation

    Percentage of participants with imaging-confirmed hemorrhagic transformation during follow-up.

    Time frame: From the first dose through Day 90 (plus or minus 7 days).

  2. Percentage of Participants With an Out-of-Range each Laboratory parameter

    Percentage of participants with each parameter outside the laboratory reference range at each assessment.

    Time frame: Pre-dose baseline and Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14).

  3. correlation between changes in cytokine levels and changes in neurological function measures

    Time frame: Days 7 and 14 (plus or minus 2 days for Day 14) against baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Sep 2027, 12 months later.

Of 572 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ischemic Stroke, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 653 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 21, 2026
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Oct 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07900503
Lead sponsor
En Chu Kong Hospital
Collaborators
National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare
Responsible party
Chin-Hsien Chang (Director, Department of Chinese Medicine, En Chu Kong Hospital, En Chu Kong Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Study contacts

Chin-Hsien Chang
Contact
01399@km.eck.org.tw
+886-2-672-3456 ext. 3605

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion