ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07899645Updated Oct 27, 2026

Therapeutic Outcomes of In-Hospital Resuscitation of Patients Admitted to the Internal Medicine Wards

An observational study in Survival to Discharge With Good Neurologic Outcome Among in Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients, sponsored by Meir Medical Center. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Meir Medical Center · Observational

Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In-hospital cardiac arrest is a common phenomenon associated with high mortality rates. In the United States, 290,000 cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest among adult patients occur annually (1). The mean patient age is 66 years, and 58% are male. In the majority of cases (81%), the initial cardiac rhythm was non-shockable (asystole, PEA). The primary cause of arrest was cardiac (50-60%), followed by respiratory causes (15-40%) (1). Survival rates for these patients have risen over the past two decades; according to the GWTG-R registry, survival to hospital discharge was 25% in 2017, with 85% of survivors demonstrating a favorable neurological outcome (CPC score of 1 or 2; see details under "Objectives"). It is important to note that these figures vary across different countries, potentially due to differences in the patient populations studied (e.g., survival odds are better for cardiac-related arrest than for respiratory-related arrest; distinctions between internal medicine, surgical, cardiac, and trauma patients; the location of resuscitation-ICU vs. general ward, etc.) as well as cultural, social, and religious factors (e.g., awareness of DNR/DNI orders among the public and medical staff, specific national legislation, and patient preferences). ...the patient and their family regarding end-of-life care due to religious, cultural, or social reasons, etc.).

The GO FAR score (Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation) is a clinical prediction tool that estimates the likelihood of survival to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome (CPC score of 1) for patients who have undergone in-hospital resuscitation. This score was developed using data from 51,000 patients across 366 hospitals, based on the GWTG-R registry. It incorporates data known prior to cardiac arrest, enabling the medical team, the patient, and the family to formulate a plan in advance regarding the course of action should the patient experience in-hospital cardiac arrest. The data points include age, neurological status upon admission, multisystem trauma, acute stroke, hematologic-oncologic disease or metastatic cancer, sepsis with bacteremia, non-cardiac reason for admission, liver failure, admission from a nursing facility, hypotension or shock upon admission, renal failure, respiratory failure, and pneumonia upon admission. Subsequently, the GO FAR 2 score was developed; while it included the same data points, it slightly modified the scoring method and also incorporated a CPC score of 2 (2,3).

We aim to examine survival rates to discharge with a good neurological outcome following in-hospital resuscitation... At Meir Hospital, we are focusing on a specific patient population: those hospitalized in internal medicine wards. This group generally has a lower likelihood of surviving with intact neurological function (due to factors such as advanced age, non-cardiac causes of arrest, and parameters contributing to a "GO FAR" score that reflects a poor prognosis). Our working hypothesis is that the success rate of resuscitation for these patients is typically very low; attempting it may cause suffering to the patient and their family without offering a reasonable chance of survival with a favorable neurological outcome. Beyond this point-which we consider paramount for the patient-resuscitation attempts with poor prospects entail other consequences: financial costs, extended hospital stays, increased workload for medical and nursing staff, and reduced resource availability for other patients with better recovery prospects, among others. Carefully selecting patients with a higher likelihood of successful in-hospital resuscitation would not only improve outcomes but also prevent unnecessary suffering. To formulate a plan for the informed selection of these patients, this study aims to collect relevant data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Survival to Discharge With Good Neurologic Outcome Among in Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Arrest

926 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 226 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 200 across 376 observational studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

Meir Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 401 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients aged 18-99 who underwent resuscitation during their hospitalization in the Department of Internal Medicine at Meir Hospital between January 2017 and October 2026.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:All patients aged 18-99 who underwent resuscitation during their hospitalization in the Department of Internal Medicine at Meir Hospital between January 2017 and October 2026.

-

Exclusion Criteria: Patients who underwent resuscitation during hospitalization in wards other than internal medicine departments, or for whom data is missing.

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. survival to discharge

    The precentage of patients who underwent in hospital cardiac arrest and survived to hopsital discharge

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Jan 2027, 0 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 14, 2026
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2029
Last update
Oct 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07899645
Responsible party
sara dichtwald (Dr, Meir Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion