ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07898904Updated Oct 27, 2026

Incremental Value of Delayed 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR in the Detection of Liver Metastases

An observational study in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
46
Ages
30 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

68-Ga-DOTATATE is a radiotracer targeting somatostatin receptors (SSTR). In this study, we investigated the diagnostic efficacy of delayed \^68\^Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and liver metastases, and performed a head-to-head comparison with conventional 68-Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT.

Read the detailed description

68-Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT has been established as a gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). However, its limitations in detecting small or low-avidity liver metastases remain a clinical challenge. In this study, we further evaluate the diagnostic performance of delayed \^68\^Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) in patients with GEP-NETs and suspected liver metastases, with a direct comparison to conventional 68-Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
03

In context

Lead sponsor

First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University is the lead sponsor of 97 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

46 patients (18 males and 28 females; 56.4±12.9 years(30-74 years old))

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

(a)Histologically confirmed well-differentiated GEP-NETs via biopsy or surgical resection in adults aged 18-80 years,(b) confirmed or suspected liver metastases, as determined by previous imaging studies or PET/CT scans,(c) availability of comprehensive surgical reports, pathological findings, comparative data, and clinical follow-up outcomes for analysis,(d) absence of PET/MR contraindications , with voluntary participation and signed informed consent forms adhering to ethical and research guidelines

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

(a) unavailability of surgical, pathological or long-term follow-up data; (b) non-compliance with age eligibility criteria or presence of comorbidities compromising protocol adherence

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
46 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 1. Sensitivity of Delayed ^68^Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR in Detecting Liver Metastases from GEP-NETs Relative to Conventional Imaging

    Using contrast-enhanced MRI or CT as the reference standard, validate the true positive detection rate of delayed \^68\^Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR for liver metastases in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Two experienced readers, blinded to the clinical history but not to the imaging modality, independently assessed the PET/MR and PET/CT images. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

    Time frame: Conventional imaging (MRI or CT) was performed within 3 months of the PET studies.

  2. 2. Lesion Detection Rate of Delayed ^68^Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR Compared to Conventional PET/CT in Patients with GEP-NETs

    Using a composite reference standard including conventional imaging (MRI/CT) and consensus reading, compare the number and characteristics of liver metastases detected by delayed PET/MR versus conventional PET/CT. Two accredited readers evaluated the images in separate sessions. Additional lesions identified only on PET/MR were categorized as high-uptake or non-uptake based on \^68\^Ga-DOTATATE avidity.

    Time frame: All PET/CT and PET/MR scans were performed on the same day following a single radiotracer injection.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350000, China
    Recruiting
08

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07898904
Lead sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Weibing Miao, MD
Contact
miaoweibing@126.com
86-0591-87981618
Weibing Miao, MD
study chair · First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion