A Phase 4 interventional study of Field-based LA-CAB/RPV in HIV Infection, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.
Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of field-based long acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine (LA-CAB/RPV) among people with HIV (PWH) who are out of care.
Participants: 40 adult men and women living with HIV will be enrolled
Procedures (methods): This is a pilot, open-label study to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and virologic impact of field-based LA-CAB-RPV for PWH who are out of care. This study will enroll 40 participants who accept field-based LA-CAB-RPV, targeting >50% who reside in rural or semi-rural counties. Participants will be followed for 7 months, with duration of follow-up selected based on the FDA approved every 2 month LA-CAB-RPV injection schedule for virally suppressed patients, aligning with the 5th injection for an every two-month cycle
4,340 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 240 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 83 across 3,312 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.
Browse HIV Infections studies →University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,367 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.
Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (88%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
HIV-1 infection documented by at least one of the following at any time prior to study entry:
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug: Field-based LA-CAB/RPV
Participants will receive their first does of long-acting cabotegravir 600 mg and rilpivirine 900 mg by separate intramuscular gluteal injections on Day 0 in a secure, community-based location of their choosing (such as their home). Additional field-based injections will be available at Week 4, and then every 2 months at Weeks 12, 20, and 28, though participants can instead choose to receive injections in the clinic instead.
Percent of preliminarily eligible participants who accept and receive field-based injection (acceptability)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 7 months
Median acceptability of intervention (AIM) score (acceptability)
AIM scores are calculated using the following scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree. Scores are calculated from a version of the following four questions: (1) The intervention meets my approval, (2) The intervention is appealing to me, (3) I like the intervention, and (4) I welcome the intervention. Scores are summed across participant and summaries of these scores are provided, minimum score is 4 and maximum score is 20 which corresponds to perfect acceptability.
Time frame: Month 3, Month 7
Median HIV treatment burden score (acceptability)
The Treatment burden Questionnaire (TBQ) is a self-reported questionnaire assessing the burden of treatment without restricting its scope to a single condition or treatment context. It has been adapted to include 13 items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all difficult) to 5 (extremely difficult) related to the burden associated with taking medicine, self-monitoring, laboratory tests, physician visits, need for organization, administrative tasks, following advice on diet and physical activity, and social impact of the treatment. Item scores can be summed into a global score, ranging from 13 to 65. Higher scores reflect higher treatment burden.
Time frame: Month 0, Month 3, Month 7
Percentage of participants who receive all indicated LA-CAB/RPV injections within the allowable 14-day window (feasibility)
As extracted from study administration and, where appropriate, clinic records, the date of injections will be determined as falling within or outside the acceptable window period. This outcome will be calculated as the percent of all participants with an indication for receipt of LA-CAB/RPV (that is, has not been excluded from further injections identified after receipt of first injection or failure to achieve appropriate decline in HIV RNA levels or viral suppression prompting transition to alternative agent), who receive all indicated injections within the acceptable 14-day window period, as determined by the date of the prior injection.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of participation at 7 months
Percentage of participants with HIV RNA <200 copies/mL at 7 months (viral suppression)
Among all participants with HIV RNA available within allowable final study visit window (week 28) (obtained through study procedures or clinical care), percent with HIV RNA \<200 copies/mL. Participants without HIV RNA available within allowable final study visit window (week 28), and for whom \>2 months have elapsed since their last injection at the end of closure of that window will be assumed to have HIV RNA \>200 copies/mL.
Time frame: Month 7
Percentage of participants with HIV RNA <200 copies/mL at their end of study visit (viral suppression)
among all participants based on their final study visit, regardless of retention in study procedures through 7-month follow-up, percent with HIV RNA \<200 at their final study visit.
Time frame: From enrollment through end of study (month 7)
Percentage of participants with viremia >200 copies/mL at enrollment who suppress to <200 copies/mL by month 7 (viral suppression)
Among participants who have an HIV RNA \>200 copies/mL on D0, the percent who have at least one HIV RNA \<200 copies/mL during follow-up evaluations through month 7.
Time frame: From enrollment through end of study (month 7)
Percentage of participants with a HIV clinic visit within 7 months from enrollment on study (re-engagement)
Among all enrolled persons, what percent attended at least one clinic visit (in-person or virtual) with a non-study affiliated primary HIV provider within 7-month follow-up period.
Time frame: From enrollment through end of study (month 7)
Percentage of eligible PWH contacted (recruitment and engagement)
Among persons with HIV who are pre-screened as eligible and with at least one contact attempt made by study staff, what percent are contacted (defined as speaking to person directly, receiving response back via text or preferred messaging medium, or encountering in-person), regardless of persons eventual eligibility or screening outcomes.
Time frame: from screening to end of recruitment (~12 months)
Percentage of contacted PWH who are screened for the study (recruitment and engagement)
Among persons with HIV who are contacted (defined as having at least one contact made by staff including speaking to person directly, receiving response back via text or preferred messaging medium, or encountering in-person), what percent undergo screening for study eligibility
Time frame: from screening to end of recruitment (~12 months)
Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form
Time frame: beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication
Access criteria: Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Sep 2028, 20 months later.
Of 88 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under HIV Infections, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 20 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 99 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 44.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill →