ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07894003Updated Oct 26, 2026

Focused Versus Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Gastrocnemius Spasticity in Children With Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy

An interventional study of Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Spastic Quadriplegia, Cerebral Palsy (CP) and Gastrocnemius Muscle, sponsored by Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2025, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 26, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) versus radial ESWT on gastrocnemius spasticity in children with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (CP). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does focused ESWT (fESWT) reduce gastrocnemius spasticity more effectively than radial ESWT (rESWT)?
  2. Are the antispastic effects of fESWT more durable over time compared with rESWT?

Researchers will compare:

  • fESWT group (one session weekly, 4 weeks)
  • rESWT group (one session weekly, 4 weeks) to see if fESWT more effective to lower Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores during all assessment time points compared with rESWT.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to either fESWT or rESWT group.
  • Receive one treatment session per week for 4 consecutive weeks.
  • Undergo MAS score evaluations at: baseline, post-intervention weeks 1-4, and follow-up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the final treatment.
Read the detailed description

Dosing parameter is identical in both groups: 1,500 shocks, 2 bar, 6 Hz, medium energy intensity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spastic Quadriplegia
  • Cerebral Palsy (CP)
  • Gastrocnemius Muscle

Keywords

  • spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy
  • gastrocnemius muscle spasticity
  • focused ESWT
  • radial ESWT
03

In context

Quadriplegia

222 studies on the registry are indexed under Quadriplegia; 75 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is close to the median of 15 across 193 interventional studies indexed under Quadriplegia.

Browse Quadriplegia studies →

Lead sponsor

Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children diagnosed with Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy by a pediatrician or pediatric neurologist;
  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ≥1 at the gastrocnemius muscle
  • No fixed contracture of the affected skeletal muscles;
  • Parents or legal guardians who provided written after receiving education about the fESWT and rESWT procedures and their associated risks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents or caregivers who were unable to cooperate during clinical assessments;
  • Parents or caregivers who were unwilling to participate in the study;
  • Children who were acutely ill at the time of intervention (e.g., with cough, fever, or upper respiratory tract infection);
  • Children who had received botulinum toxin type A injection within the past 6 months;
  • Children who had undergone lower limb surgery within the past 12 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

    Total impulses per session: 1,500 shocks. Pressure: 2 bar. Frequency: 6 Hz. Energy intensity: medium. Treatment frequency: once weekly for four consecutive weeks (Weeks 1-4). Treatment area: gastrocnemius muscle bellies, including both medial and lateral heads, applied using a sweeping technique from the gastrocnemius down to the soleus. Coupling medium: standard ultrasound gel. Patient position: prone with the knee extended and the ankle in the patient's comfortable position.

    Device: Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

    Total impulses per session: 1,500 shocks. Pressure: 2 bar. Frequency: 6 Hz. Energy intensity: medium. Treatment frequency: once weekly for four consecutive weeks (Weeks 1-4). Treatment area: gastrocnemius muscle bellies, including both medial and lateral heads, applied using a sweeping technique from the gastrocnemius down to the soleus. Coupling medium: standard ultrasound gel. Patient position: prone with the knee extended and the ankle in the patient's comfortable position.

    Device: Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceFocused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

    Focused ESWT (fESWT) generates true acoustic shockwaves that converge at a defined focal point within deeper tissue. Dosing parameters: total impulses 1,500 shocks per session; 2 bar pressure; 6 Hz frequency; medium energy intensity; once weekly for four consecutive weeks. Treatment area: gastrocnemius muscle bellies, including both medial and lateral heads, applied using a sweeping technique from the gastrocnemius down to the soleus. Patient position: prone with the knee extended and the ankle in the patient's comfortable position.

    Also known as: fESWT, focused shockwave therapy

  • DeviceRadial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

    Radial ESWT (rESWT) uses pneumatic acceleration of a projectile that produces pressure waves diverging from the applicator tip, with maximal energy at the skin surface and progressively decreasing energy with depth. Dosing parameters: 1,500 shocks per session; 2 bar pressure; 6 Hz frequency; medium energy intensity; once weekly for four consecutive weeks. Treatment area: gastrocnemius muscle bellies, including both medial and lateral heads, applied using a sweeping technique from the gastrocnemius down to the soleus. Patient position: prone with the knee extended and the ankle in the patient's comfortable position.

    Also known as: rESWT, radial shockwave therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of the gastrocnemius muscle

    The primary outcome was the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of the gastrocnemius muscle, recorded as an ordinal score on a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4), measuring resistance to passive stretch.

    Time frame: The primary outcome was evaluated at baseline, post-intervention weeks 1 to 4, and follow-up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-final treatment by blinded outcome assessor.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital (RSCM)
    Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Graham HK, Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Dan B, Lin JP, Damiano DL, Becher JG, Gaebler-Spira D, Colver A, Reddihough DS, Crompton KE, Lieber RL. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Jan 7;2:15082. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.82. PubMed 27188686 ↗
  • Brandenburg JE, Rabatin AE, Driscoll SW. Spasticity Interventions: Decision-Making and Management. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2023 Jun;70(3):483-500. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Mar 21. PubMed 37121638 ↗
  • Zhang HL, Jin RJ, Guan L, Zhong DL, Li YX, Liu XB, Xiao QW, Xiao XL, Li J. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Spasticity After Upper Motor Neuron Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 1;101(7):615-623. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001977. Epub 2022 Feb 15. PubMed 35152251 ↗
  • Chang MC, Choo YJ, Kwak SG, Nam K, Kim SY, Lee HJ, Kwak S. Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Controlling Spasticity in Cerebral Palsy Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Timing of Outcome Measurement. Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;10(2):332. doi: 10.3390/children10020332. PubMed 36832460 ↗
  • Yang SM, Chen SY, Chen KY, Lai TJ, Lin MT. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for post-stroke spasticity and dose-response analysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2025 Dec;61(6):787-797. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08796-9. PubMed 41677776 ↗
  • Wu YT, Chang CN, Chen YM, Hu GC. Comparison of the effect of focused and radial extracorporeal shock waves on spastic equinus in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):518-525. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04801-8. Epub 2017 Oct 25. PubMed 29072044 ↗
  • Park DS, Kwon DR, Park GY, Lee MY. Therapeutic Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy According to Treatment Session on Gastrocnemius Muscle Spasticity in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;39(6):914-21. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.914. Epub 2015 Dec 29. PubMed 26798605 ↗
  • Duan H, Lian Y, Jing Y, Xing J, Li Z. Research progress in extracorporeal shock wave therapy for upper limb spasticity after stroke. Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1121026. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1121026. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36846123 ↗
  • Mihai EE, Popescu MN, Iliescu AN, Berteanu M. A systematic review on extracorporeal shock wave therapy and botulinum toxin for spasticity treatment: a comparison on efficacy. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Aug;58(4):565-574. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07136-2. Epub 2022 Apr 12. PubMed 35412036 ↗
  • Ozbek IC, Tikiz C. Effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in post-stroke spasticity patients: Evaluation with shear wave elastography. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Dec 27;71(2):206-215. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2025.14800. eCollection 2025 Jun. PubMed 40740180 ↗
  • Tur Segura M, Gimeno Esteve F, Biedermann Villagra T, Jimenez Redondo J, Garcia Rodriguez N, Mila Villarroel R. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the management of spasticity in cerebral palsy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 13;15:1402452. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1402452. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38957349 ↗
  • Wardhani RK, Wahyuni LK, Laksmitasari B, Lakmudin A. Effect of total number of pulses of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) on hamstring muscle spasticity in children with spastic type cerebral palsy: A randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2022;15(1):159-164. doi: 10.3233/PRM-200796. PubMed 35275569 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to the small sample size and privacy considerations for pediatric participants.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07894003
Lead sponsor
Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
Responsible party
Rizky Kusuma Wardhani (Consultant in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
Start date
Dec 12, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026
Completion
Sep 14, 2026
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

Rizky K Wardhani, Dr
principal investigator · Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion