An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Atrial Tachycardia and Paroxysmal AF, sponsored by Sebastien Knecht. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.
Sponsored by Sebastien Knecht · Observational
The goal of this observational study is to learn more about how doctors can create a complete electrical block in the heart during catheter ablation procedures used to treat certain abnormal heart rhythms. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants who undergo a catheter ablation procedure as part of their normal medical care may take part in this study. No additional tests, visits, or procedures will be required. Researchers will collect information that is routinely recorded during the procedure to better understand how electrical signals travel in the heart and how ablation procedures can be improved.
3,957 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 933 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 300 across 1,390 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.
Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →Sebastien Knecht is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The study population comprises adult patients (≥18 years) with symptomatic AF (paroxysmal, persistent) or perimitral atrial tachycardia (PMAT) undergoing left atrial catheter ablation with a planned first-time mitral isthmus line. Both sexes are eligible without restriction on body weight, BMI, or ethnicity. Patients must have sufficient procedural documentation to allow complete lesion-level data extraction.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Anatomical Zone of the Effective Coronary Sinus RF Application
Anatomical location of the first epicardial radiofrequency (RF) application within the coronary sinus that is temporally associated with achievement of bidirectional mitral isthmus conduction block. Unit: categorical variable (Superior, Anterior, Inferior, or Posterior zone).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
RF Power of the Effective Coronary Sinus RF Application
RF power delivered during the first epicardial coronary sinus RF application that is temporally associated with achievement of bidirectional mitral isthmus conduction block. Unit: Watts (W).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Duration of the Effective Coronary Sinus RF Application
Duration of the first epicardial coronary sinus RF application that is temporally associated with achievement of bidirectional mitral isthmus conduction block. Unit: seconds (s).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Contact Force of the Effective Coronary Sinus RF Application
Mean contact force recorded during the first epicardial coronary sinus RF application that is temporally associated with achievement of bidirectional mitral isthmus conduction block. Unit: grams (g).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Ablation Index of the Effective Coronary Sinus RF Application
Ablation Index value of the first epicardial coronary sinus RF application that is temporally associated with achievement of bidirectional mitral isthmus conduction block.
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Cumulative Epicardial RF Time to Mitral Isthmus Block
Total cumulative duration of epicardial coronary sinus RF applications delivered up to and including the first application associated with achievement of bidirectional mitral isthmus conduction block. Unit: seconds (s).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Relative Order of the Effective Coronary Sinus RF Application
Sequence number of the first epicardial coronary sinus RF application that is temporally associated with achievement of bidirectional mitral isthmus conduction block. Unit: lesion number (n).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Number of Epicardial Coronary Sinus RF Applications
Total number of epicardial radiofrequency (RF) applications delivered within the coronary sinus during the ablation procedure. Unit: number of RF applications (n).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Distribution of Epicardial Coronary Sinus RF Applications
Number of epicardial RF applications delivered within each of the 8 predefined anatomical coronary sinus zones. Unit: number of RF applications per anatomical zone (n).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Cumulative Epicardial Coronary Sinus RF Time
Total cumulative duration of all epicardial RF applications delivered within the coronary sinus. Unit: seconds (s).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Total Procedure RF Time
Total duration of radiofrequency energy delivery during the entire ablation procedure. Unit: seconds (s).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Total Fluoroscopy Time
Total fluoroscopy time during the ablation procedure. Unit: minutes (min).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Total Procedure Duration
Total duration of the ablation procedure. Unit: minutes (min).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Achievement of Bidirectional Mitral Isthmus Block Without Epicardial Coronary Sinus Ablation
Proportion of procedures in which bidirectional mitral isthmus (MI) conduction block is achieved without delivery of epicardial RF applications within the coronary sinus. Unit: percentage of procedures (%).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Number of Coronary Sinus RF Applications According to VOM-EI Success
Difference in the total number of epicardial coronary sinus RF applications between procedures with successful Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (VOM-EI) and procedures with failed or absent VOM-EI. Unit: number of RF applications (n).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Distribution of Coronary Sinus RF Applications According to VOM-EI Success
Difference in the distribution of epicardial coronary sinus RF applications across the 8 predefined anatomical zones between procedures with successful VOM-EI and procedures with failed or absent VOM-EI. Unit: number of RF applications per anatomical zone (n).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Cumulative Epicardial RF Time According to VOM-EI Success
Difference in cumulative epicardial coronary sinus RF time between procedures with successful VOM-EI and procedures with failed or absent VOM-EI. Unit: seconds (s).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Time to Mitral Isthmus Block According to VOM-EI Success
Difference in time to achievement of bidirectional mitral isthmus conduction block between procedures with successful VOM-EI and procedures with failed or absent VOM-EI. Unit: seconds (s).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
Incidence of Periprocedural Complications
Incidence of periprocedural complications related to mitral isthmus ablation, epicardial coronary sinus RF ablation, or Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (VOM-EI), including pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade, coronary sinus dissection or perforation, coronary artery injury or spasm, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), phrenic nerve palsy, steam pop, and complications specifically related to VOM-EI. Unit: percentage of participants with at least one periprocedural complication (%).
Time frame: During the index ablation procedure
No study locations are listed for this record.
Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 14 months later.
Of 536 non-industry observational studies under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 85. This study's planned 14 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 685 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 75.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sebastien Knecht