ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07887672iMMagine-4Updated Oct 21, 2026

A Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Anitocabtagene Autoleucel Versus Standard of Care in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Anitocabtagene autoleucel and Daratumumab in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Kite, A Gilead Company. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Kite, A Gilead Company (part of Gilead Sciences) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 21, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical study iMMagine-4 is to compare and assess the safety and effectiveness of anitocabtagene autoleucel versus standard of care therapy (SOCT) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of anitocabtagene autoleucel versus quadruplet-based SOCT in participants with NDMM who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT).

Read the detailed description

After completing quadruplet-based induction therapy followed by anitocabtagene autoleucel or continuous maintenance therapy, participants will continue to be followed for disease assessments and outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Multiple Myeloma
  • CAR-T
  • ddBCMA
  • BCMA
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,712 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 752 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 41 across 2,965 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Kite, A Gilead Company is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (79%) have results posted.

First submitted after Kite became part of Gilead Sciences.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Determined by the Investigator to be not eligible for auto-SCT
  • Documented newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) according to IMWG diagnostic criteria
  • Measurable disease at screening per IMWG:

    1. Serum M-protein level ≥ 1.0 g/dL; or
    2. Urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours; or
    3. Serum free light chain (FLC) ≥ 10 mg/dL (100 mg/L) and abnormal serum FLC ratio
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2.
  • Adequate hematological function
  • Adequate renal, hepatic, pulmonary, and cardiac function

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior anti-MM therapy (including B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapy, CAR T-cell therapy, or genetically modified cells), with the exception of protocol-specified anti-MM stabilizing therapy and palliative radiation
  • Central nervous system (CNS) or meningeal involvement of MM
  • History of or active plasma cell leukemia, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, POEMS syndrome, or amyloidosis
  • Active malignancy (other than MM) requiring ongoing treatment for disease control within the last 24 months.
  • Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant
  • Any prior systemic treatment or radiotherapy treatment for any cancer other than MM within 24 months before randomization.
  • Live vaccine ≤ 4 weeks before randomization
  • Presence or suspicion of infection that is uncontrolled
  • History or presence of intracranial or CNS disorders, or CNS neoplasms (benign and malignant)
  • Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Females of childbearing potential who are not willing to use a highly effective method of contraception from the time of informed consent through the protocol-specified duration
  • Contraindication to fludarabine or cyclophosphamide
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any trial agent or trial drug components
  • Life expectancy \< 12 weeks

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A: Standard of Care Therapy (SOCT)

    Participants will receive a total of eight induction therapy cycles, 21-days for each cycle, with daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Following induction, participants will receive maintenance therapy during 28-day cycles of daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone, until unacceptable toxicity, progression as per IMWG criteria, death, or participant withdrawal of consent (whichever occurs first).

    Drug: Daratumumab · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Lenalidomide · Drug: Dexamethasone

  • Experimental
    Arm B: Anitocabtagene Autoleucel

    Participants will receive a total of eight induction therapy cycles, 21-days for each cycle, with daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Participants will receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for 3 days, followed by a single infusion of anitocabtagene autoleucel. If specific criteria are met, some participants may receive maintenance therapy (at or after Month 6 post-anitocabtagene autoleucel infusion) during 28-day cycles of daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone, until unacceptable toxicity, progression as per IMWG criteria, death, or participant withdrawal of consent (whichever occurs first).

    Drug: Anitocabtagene autoleucel · Drug: Daratumumab · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Lenalidomide · Drug: Dexamethasone · Drug: Fludarabine · Drug: Cyclophosphamide

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Complete Response (CR) or Stringent CR (sCR) Rate at 12 Months

    Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR/sCR is defined as the proportion of participants achieving CR/sCR and MRD-negative status (10\^5 cutoff) at 12 months. CR/sCR per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria is determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC).

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria as determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

  2. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve a best overall response of at least PR or better (sCR, CR, very good partial response (VGPR), or PR) per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC.

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

  3. Rate of Very Good Partial Response or Better

    Rate of VGPR or better is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve a best overall response of sCR, CR, or VGPR per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC.

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

  4. Rate of CR or Better

    Rate of CR or better is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve a best overall response of CR or sCR per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC.

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

  5. Time to Response (TTR)

    Time to response is defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date when a participant achieves a best overall response of sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR per 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC.

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

  6. Duration of response (DOR)

    DOR is derived only among participants who experience an overall response (sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR) per the 2016 IMWG criteria (Kumar 2016) and is defined as the time from first overall response to disease progression per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

  7. Time to Progression

    Time to progression (TTP) is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

  8. Duration of Treatment-Free Interval

    Duration of treatment-free interval is defined as time from date of anitocabtagene autoleucel infusion to date of initiation of maintenance therapy.

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

  9. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Enrollment up to 15 years

  10. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Enrollment up to 15 years

  11. Percentage of Participants With Anti-Anitocabtagene Autoleucel Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Antibodies (Anitocabtagene Autoleucel Arm B)

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

  12. Change From Baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores

    The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a multi-item questionnaire measuring the following content: five (5) multi-item functional scales, three (3) multi-item symptom scales, six (6) single item symptoms scales, and one combined global health status/global quality of life (QoL) scale. Each scale is measured from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores for functioning scales and for the Global Health Status /Global QoL scale indicate a higher level of functioning and a better QoL (ie, a better state of the participant), respectively, whereas higher scores in symptom scales represent a higher level of symptoms (ie, a worse state of the participant).

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 5 years

  13. Change From Baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) - Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score

    The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales; 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of one week. Scores from each subscale are transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 5 years

  14. Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scale index Score and VAS Scale Score

    The EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status with two components: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analog scale (VAS). The descriptive system can be used to estimate a single index value through application of a tariff of values based on direct valuations of health. The index typically ranges from 0 to 1 where a higher score indicates a better outcome. The VAS is a 20-cm VAS for recording self-rated current HRQoL state where a score of 0 represents ("the worst health you can imagine") and a score of 100 represents ("the best health you can imagine").

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 5 years

  15. Percentages of Participants With Responses for Patient Global Impression Scale - Severity (PGI-S)

    The PGI-S is a 5-point, single-item measure that assesses a patient's perception of disease symptom severity at a point in time.

    Time frame: Screening, up to 1 year

  16. Percentages of Participants Responses for Patient Global Impression Scale Change (PGI-C)

    The PGI-C is a 7-point, single-item measure that evaluates patients' perceptions of change in their symptoms over time.

    Time frame: Screening, up to 1 year

  17. Percentages of Participants With Responses for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Item GP5 (FACT-GP5)

    The FACT-GP5 is a single-item question for assessing global treatment side effect bother from a patient's perspective.

    Time frame: Screening, up to 2 years

  18. Percentage of Participants Hospitalizations, Inpatient Days, Intensive Care Unit Days, and Reasons for Hospitalization

    Time frame: Up to 15 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07887672
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2042 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2042 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Medical Information
Contact
medinfo@kitepharma.com
844-454-5483(1-844-454-KITE)
Kite Study Director
study chair · Kite, A Gilead Company

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Anitocabtagene autoleucel

Start the discussion