ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07887542Updated Oct 21, 2026

Effect of Home and Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Via Home BP Monitoring System (HMS) on Adults With Hypertension in Taiwan

An interventional study of Case-manager surveillance with physician-guided remote titration and Passive data review at clinic visits in Hypertension, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2022, registered Aug 2023).
Updated Oct 21, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
211
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether adding case-manager support to app-connected home blood pressure monitoring improves blood pressure control in adults with hypertension.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does case-manager surveillance with physician-guided medication adjustment lower office, home, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure more than home monitoring with review of readings only at clinic visits?
  • Does it change how consistently participants measure their blood pressure at home, how their blood pressure medicines are adjusted, and how often side effects are reported?

All participants received the same Bluetooth upper-arm blood pressure monitor linked to a smartphone app (OMRON Home BP Monitoring System, HMS). They measured their blood pressure at home in the first week of every month, following the Taiwan "722" schedule: 7 consecutive days, morning and evening, 2 readings each time.

Each participant spent 6 months in each of two conditions, in a randomly assigned order:

  • Case-manager period: case managers reviewed the home readings every month, contacted participants, and arranged earlier clinic visits for medication adjustment when readings met predefined criteria.
  • Control period: home readings were stored and reviewed by the cardiologist only at scheduled clinic visits.

Participants attended clinic visits at the start of the study and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Read the detailed description

Design and setting:

This is a single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-sequence crossover trial conducted at the cardiology outpatient clinics of National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive the case-manager intervention for months 0-6 followed by the control condition for months 6-12, or the reverse order. Crossover occurred at 6 months without a washout period.

Home monitoring common to both conditions:

At enrollment, every participant received an upper-arm Bluetooth blood pressure monitor (OMRON HEM-7157T) paired with the HMS smartphone application. The application transmitted every reading automatically, provided a log for medication intake and side effects, and delivered the same system-generated educational messages and reminders in both conditions. Participants were trained to follow the Taiwan 722 home blood pressure protocol in the first week of each month; measurement at other times was allowed.

Intervention condition (case-manager surveillance with physician-guided remote titration):

Cardiovascular case managers reviewed the transmitted readings at the beginning of each month against two targets: home blood pressure below 130/80 mmHg and self-reported medication adherence on more than 50% of days. A predefined algorithm specified: telephone counseling when participants measured on fewer than 4 days, reported adherence below 50%, or reported side effects; a clinic visit within 2 weeks for home blood pressure above 180/110 mmHg; doubling of the current dose or addition of a drug class when home blood pressure exceeded 135/85 or 145/90 mmHg, respectively, for 2 consecutive months; a change in dosing time or frequency for morning-only or evening-only elevation; and withdrawal of a drug class for home systolic blood pressure below 110 mmHg. All prescription changes were made by the cardiologist at a clinic visit, scheduled earlier when the algorithm required it, and recorded in the medical record.

Control condition (passive data review):

Readings were stored but not reviewed between visits. At each scheduled clinic visit, the treating cardiologist received a summary of the home readings from the preceding 2 weeks and adjusted treatment at his or her discretion.

Assessments:

Office blood pressure was measured at enrollment and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, and blood and urine tests were performed at enrollment and at approximately 6 and 12 months. Medication changes, side-effect reports, and health care use were recorded throughout.

Analysis:

Treatment effects are estimated as the 6-month (period 1) difference between randomized sequences, adjusted for baseline values, and as the within-participant crossover treatment effect using the 6- and 12-month values. The sequence effect is examined as an indicator of carryover.

This trial was registered retrospectively, after enrollment was completed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Home blood pressure monitoring
  • Blood pressure telemonitoring
  • Case management
  • Antihypertensive medication titration
  • Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
  • Mobile health
  • Crossover trial
03

In context

Hypertension

6,834 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 211 is above the median of 90 across 5,095 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Age 18 years or older. Age 18 years or older. (Participants enrolled before approval of protocol version 4 in February 2023 were required to be 20 to 80 years old.)
  • Patients receiving antihypertensive medication who have not achieved the treatment target of office blood pressure \<130/80 mmHg, or patients with newly diagnosed hypertension with office systolic blood pressure of 140-180 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure of 90-110 mmHg (or 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure >130/80 mmHg).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • End-stage, incurable disease with life expectancy of less than one year.
  • Women who are pregnant, may be pregnant, or are breastfeeding.
  • Dementia or loss of most self-care ability (ECOG performance status 2 or above).
  • Office blood pressure >180/110 mmHg.
  • Documented cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Diagnosed secondary hypertension.
  • Inability to use a smartphone.
  • Acute cardiovascular event within the past six months, including stroke, decompensated heart failure, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
211 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Case Management First, Then Passive Review

    Months 0-6: case-manager surveillance with physician-guided remote titration. Months 6-12: passive review of home readings at clinic visits. Crossover at month 6 without a washout period. The same app-connected home blood pressure monitor was used throughout.

    Other: Case-manager surveillance with physician-guided remote titration · Other: Passive data review at clinic visits

  • Experimental
    Passive Review First, Then Case Management

    Months 0-6: passive review of home readings at clinic visits. Months 6-12: case-manager surveillance with physician-guided remote titration. Crossover at month 6 without a washout period. The same app-connected home blood pressure monitor was used throughout.

    Other: Case-manager surveillance with physician-guided remote titration · Other: Passive data review at clinic visits

Interventions

  • OtherCase-manager surveillance with physician-guided remote titration

    Participants measure home blood pressure with an OMRON HEM-7157T Bluetooth monitor linked to the Home BP Monitoring System (HMS) app, following the Taiwan 722 protocol in the first week of each month. Case managers review the transmitted readings monthly against targets of home BP \<130/80 mmHg and medication adherence \>50% of days. A predefined algorithm guides telephone counseling (fewer than 4 measurement days, adherence \<50%, or side effects), a clinic visit within 2 weeks (home BP \>180/110 mmHg), dose doubling or addition of a drug class (home BP \>135/85 or \>145/90 mmHg for 2 consecutive months), dosing time or frequency changes (morning-only or evening-only elevation), and drug withdrawal (home systolic BP \<110 mmHg). All prescription changes are made by the cardiologist at a clinic visit, scheduled earlier when needed.

  • OtherPassive data review at clinic visits

    Participants use the same monitor and app and follow the same 722 measurement protocol. Readings are stored but not reviewed between visits, and no case-manager contact is provided. At each scheduled clinic visit, the treating cardiologist receives a summary of the home readings from the preceding 2 weeks and adjusts treatment at his or her discretion. The app delivers the same system-generated education messages and reminders as in the intervention period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Office Systolic Blood Pressure

    Office systolic blood pressure (mmHg) measured at the clinic visit, compared between the case-manager surveillance and passive data review conditions of the crossover design.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12

  2. Office Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Office diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) measured at the clinic visit, compared between the case-manager surveillance and passive data review conditions of the crossover design.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12

  3. Home Systolic Blood Pressure

    Mean home systolic blood pressure (mmHg), measured with the Omron HEM-7157T according to the 722 protocol: on 7 consecutive days at the start of each month, 2 sessions per day (morning and evening), 2 readings per session. Values are compared between the case-manager surveillance and passive data review conditions of the crossover design.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12

  4. Home Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Mean home diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) measured with the Omron HEM-7157T according to the 722 protocol (7 consecutive days at the start of each month, morning and evening, 2 readings per session), compared between the case-manager surveillance and passive data review conditions of the crossover design.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12

  5. 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure

    Mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure (mmHg) on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, compared between the case-manager surveillance and passive data review conditions of the crossover design.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12

  6. 24-Hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, compared between the case-manager surveillance and passive data review conditions of the crossover design.

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity

    Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (m/s), measured with an automated oscillometric device, as a measure of arterial stiffness (target-organ damage).

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12

  2. Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

    Participants with adverse reactions to antihypertensive treatment that led to discontinuation of a medication, recorded in the app or at clinic visits.

    Time frame: Up to month 12

  3. Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio

    Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (mg/g), as a measure of microalbuminuria (target-organ damage).

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12

  4. ECG Voltage

    Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SV1 + RV5 or RV6, mV) on 12-lead ECG, as a measure of left ventricular hypertrophy (target-organ damage).

    Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 12

  5. Adherence to the Home Blood Pressure Measurement Protocol

    Percentage of days per week on which both the morning and evening measurement sessions were completed, calculated from readings transmitted by the app.

    Time frame: Weekly, from baseline to month 12

  6. Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness

    Average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (µm) measured by optical coherence tomography, as a measure of retinal microvascular damage.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Number of Cardiology Clinic Visits

    Number of cardiology outpatient visits per participant, from hospital records.

    Time frame: Months 0-6 and months 6-12

  8. Number of Emergency Department Visits

    Number of emergency department visits per participant, from hospital records.

    Time frame: Months 0-6 and months 6-12

  9. Number of Hospital Admissions

    Number of hospital admissions per participant, from hospital records.

    Time frame: Months 0-6 and months 6-12

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
    Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results (office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure, medication changes, and side-effect reports) will be available on reasonable request to the principal investigator, after approval of a research proposal and subject to approval by the Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch and a data use agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results, with no planned end date.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal approved by the principal investigator and the relevant ethics committee. Requests should be directed to the principal investigator.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07887542
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
Collaborators
Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
Start date
Oct 6, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 21, 2025
Completion
Oct 21, 2025
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Chih-Kuo Lee, MD
principal investigator · National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion