ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07886489TRANSCENDUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Donor Derived Cell Free DNA (Dd-cfDNA) as a Biomarker for Allograft Rejection in Heart Transplant Recipients

An observational study in Heart Transplantation, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Enrolling by invitation at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Observational

Updated Oct 21, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Following heart transplantation (HTx), lifelong immunosuppressive treatment is required to prevent the immune system from attacking, damaging, and rejecting the donor hear (allograft). Currently, diagnosis of allograft rejection is based on evaluation of endomyocardial biopsies (EMB), which remains the gold standard for rejection diagnostics. However, previous research have highlighted limitations of EMBs, including interrater variation, sampling error and risks of complications.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has emerged as a promising post-transplant biomarker of allograft rejection. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that dd-cfDNA demonstrates greater diagnostic performance for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) than for cellular rejection (TCR) and that the specificity exceeds its sensitivity in predicting rejection, highlighting limitations in its clinical application.

The primary objective of this observational project are to investigate if measurement of dd-cfDNA can be utilized as a biomarker for acute rejection in the management of heart transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation in a Danish-Norwegian patient cohort.

Secondary objectives include:

  • to correlate dd-cfDNA levels with markers of allograft dysfunction and rejection, i.e., EMBs, ejection fraction, left ventricular global longitudinal strain, troponin T, natriuretic peptide test (proBNP) and score of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)
  • to examine post-transplant dd-cfDNA kinetics during the first 6 six weeks after HTx
  • to explore clinical meaningful change in dd-cfDNA associated with acute allograft rejection
  • to investigate the association between dd-cfDNA, chronic allograft rejection, allograft dysfunction and patients' long-term survival

To study the objectives, this project will include 100 HTx patients prior to transplantation over a 2-3 year period and conduct a long-time follow up 10 years after transplantation. Patients entering the waiting list for HTx at Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Denmark, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet Oslo, Norway, or Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, are invited to participate in the project. Patients are invited to participate in the current project if fulfilling the pre-defined inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria.

A comprehensive collection of clinical, pathological and immunological data is conducted from up to 15 visits during the first year after transplantation. Thereafter, from all annual visits and upon admission if allograft rejection is suspected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Transplantation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Heart transplantation
  • Heart Failure
  • Donor-derived cell free DNA
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,803 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,222 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 200 across 1,719 observational studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,299 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing heart transplantation at Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Denmark, Rikshospitalet Oslo, Norway, or Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients entering the waiting list for their first heart transplantation (HTX1) at Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Denmark, Rikshospitalet Oslo, Norway, or Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
  • Patients ≥18 years old
  • Patients signing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are withdrawn from the heart transplant waiting list after informed consent has been provided
  • Patients who have previously received a solid organ transplantation
  • Patients unable to receive and understand the oral and written project information
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Heart transplant recipients

    Diagnostic Test: Donor-derived cell free DNA

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDonor-derived cell free DNA

    Blood samples from months 1, 3, 6 and 12, and upon suspected allograft rejection, will be analysed to quantify dd-cfDNA studying the primary objective. To study additional objectives dd-cfDNA is further analyzed yearly after year 1 in all included patients. In a subgroup of patients without allograft rejection, dd-cfDNA will be analyed weekly within the first 6 weeks after transplantation to study normal dd-cfDNA kinetics after transplantation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Association between dd-cfDNA level and acute allograft rejection (TCR and AMR) in the first year after transplantation, which will be evaluated using a linear mixed model and reported as the model estimate for the fixed effect (allograft rejection)

    Time frame: From baseline to one year follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Association between dd-cfDNA level and acute allograft rejection in the 3rd, 5th and 10th year after transplantation implementing linear mixed models and reported as the model estimate for the fixed effect (allograft rejection)

    Time frame: From baseline to 10 year follow up

  2. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) depicting the performance of dd-cfDNA to distinguish between acute allograft rejection or no rejection in the 1st, 3rd, 5th and 10th year after transplantation.

    Time frame: From baseline to 10 ten year follow up

  3. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of dd-cfDNA as a biomarker of allograft rejection, i.e., the proportion of positive results (increased dd-cfDNA) that are true positive (developed rejection) after 1, 3, 5 and 10 years

    Time frame: Baseline to 10 year follow up

  4. The specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) of dd-cfDNA as a biomarker of acute allograft rejection, i.e., the proportion of negative results (decreased/no change in dd-cfDNA) that are true negative (no rejection) after 1, 3, 5 and 10 years

    Time frame: Baseline to 10 year follow up

  5. Change in the fraction of dd-cfDNA (dd-cfDNA kinetics) in patients without allograft rejection in the first six weeks after transplantation

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks afters transplantation

  6. Correlation between dd-cfDNA level, clinical findings (GLS, biopsy results, etc.) and patient characteristics

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, 5, and 10 year follow up

Other outcomes

  1. AUROC depicting the performance of current available biomarkers, including TnT to distinguish between acute allograft rejection or no rejection, and compare with AUROC statistics of dd-cfDNA

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, 5, and 10 year follow up

  2. Allograft dysfunction, i.e., frequency of patients developing moderate to severe CAV (CAV score ≥2) after year 1, 2, 5 and 10 of transplantation stratified by the number and type of rejection

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, 5, and 10 year follow up

  3. Correlation between dd-cfDNA levels, CAV progression and overall mortality during the 10-year project period

    Time frame: Baseline to 10 year follow up

  4. The frequency of patients developing HLA antibodies over the 10-year project and the correlation to overall mortality stratified by type of donor-specific HLA antibodies and strengths

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, 5, and 10 year follow up

  5. Correlation between HLA antibodies (type and strength), dd-cfDNA level and overall mortality

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, 5, and 10 year follow up

  6. Patient survival 10 years after heart transplantation

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 and 10 year follow up

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
  • Rigshospitalet Copenhagen
    Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
  • Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, Norway
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Due to restrictions imposed by Danish and Norwegian data protection legislation, individual participant-level data cannot be made publicly available or shared with third party. Project data may be made available upon reasonable request and subject to appropriate collaboration agreements, in accordance with applicable Danish and Norwegian data protection legislation.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2029, 35 months after the start.

Of 665 non-industry observational studies under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 44 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 89. This study's planned 35 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 825 studies reached it within 40 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 80.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 14, 2026
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
StartActual
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2038
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07886489
Collaborators
Aarhus University Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2038 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion