ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07885878Updated Oct 21, 2026

Implementation of Shoulder School in Albania

An interventional study of Shoulder school and Standard Care (in control arm) in Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain, sponsored by University of Valladolid. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by University of Valladolid · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 21, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that can cause pain, movement limitations, disability, and difficulties performing daily and occupational activities. Rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is one of the most common clinical presentations among people seeking care for shoulder problems.

Exercise therapy is recommended as a first-line conservative treatment for RCRSP. Progressive resistance training and motor control exercises can improve pain and shoulder function, while exercises targeting thoracic mobility and scapular and glenohumeral function may be useful for addressing individual movement and functional limitations. However, there is still uncertainty about the optimal selection, intensity, volume, and progression of exercises for individual patients.

Objective To analyze the effects of a shoulder school program led by a physiotherapist and based on therapeutic exercise focused on active scapular and thoracic work, compared to conventional treatment in patients with RCRSP referred to Primary Care Physiotherapy Units in Albania, regarding pain, functional capacity, and quality of life.

Methods Design: Single-blind, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled non-inferiority study.

Sample: Patients with RCRSP referred to primary care in Albania. Dependent Variables: Pain, functional capacity, quality of life, joint mobility, isometrical strenght, and patient satisfaction.

Independent Variables:

Intervention group: Shoulder school program including exercises focused on scapular, thoracic, and rotator cuff function.

Control group: Conventional physiotherapy treatment.

Randomization: Cluster randomization by centers. Analysis: Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25.0.

Clinical Implications This study will provide objective data on the effects of implementing a group exercise program guided by a physiotherapist. The results could offer evidence for a resource that may be highly useful in Primary Care Physiotherapy. This approach has the potential to optimize labor, time, and space resources within this healthcare service.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain

Keywords

  • rotator cuff-related shoulder pain
  • exercise
  • pain
  • disability
  • quality of life
03

In context

Motor Activity

2,646 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,205 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 60 across 2,309 interventional studies indexed under Motor Activity.

Browse Motor Activity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Valladolid is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1)aged over 18 years; 2) shoulder pain lasting more than six weeks; 3) shoulder pain attributable to rotator cuff tendinopathy or tendinosis, bursitis or impingement, according to the diagnostic criteria of the most recent clinical guidelines, international consensus

    • and the British Shoulder and Elbow Society; and 4) ability to understand and complete the evaluation questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) presence of red-flag symptoms suggesting fractures, dislocations, or complete tendon tears, among others; 2) neurological disorders; 3) other severe shoulder pathologies such as inflammatory arthritis, frozen shoulder, or glenohumeral instability; 4) corticosteroid injections or physical therapy treatment within the last six months; 5) prior shoulder surgery; 6) pregnancy; 7) or cognitive deficits that could limit comprehension of questionnaires or participation in testing.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Shoulder school

    A therapeutic exercise protocol will be carried out, consisting of 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks, supervised and guided by a physiotherapist. The objective is to improve thoracic mobility, as well as the strength and motor control of the scapular retractor and protractor muscles (middle and lower trapezius, rhomboids, and serratus anterior) and the rotator cuff.

    Other: Shoulder school

  • Active comparator
    Standard protocol

    The protocol will include the application of therapeutic ultrasound, TENS, and kinesitherapy which will be applied through classic shoulder mobility exercises.

    Other: Standard Care (in control arm)

Interventions

  • OtherShoulder school

    A therapeutic exercise protocol will be carried out, consisting of 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks, supervised and guided by a physiotherapist. The objective is to improve thoracic mobility, as well as the strength and motor control of the scapular retractor and protractor muscles (middle and lower trapezius, rhomboids, and serratus anterior) and the rotator cuff.

  • OtherStandard Care (in control arm)

    The protocol will include the application of therapeutic ultrasound, TENS, and kinesitherapy which will be applied through classic shoulder mobility exercises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity measured with visual analogue scale

    Visual analogue scale is a subjective pain intensity measurement tool in which subjects are asked to indicate their perceived pain intensity on a 10 cm line. Patients will be informed that the left end of the scale represents "no pain" and the right end represents "the worst pain imaginable." It will be explained that marking closer to the right corresponds to a higher score (10 cm) and greater pain, while marking closer to the left corresponds to a lower score (0 cm) and a better state of health.

    Time frame: From enrollment through treatment completion and up to 3 months of follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disability measured with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire

    The DASH questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is a 30-item self-report tool used to measure upper extremity disability and symptoms. It evaluates a patient's ability to perform everyday activities using a 1-to-5 Likert scale for each question. The final score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents no disability and 100 indicates severe disability.

    Time frame: From enrollment through treatment completion and up to 3 months of follow-up

  2. Quality of life measured with EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels

    The EQ-5D-5L stands for EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels, a standardized questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life. It evaluates five health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated across five severity levels, ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems." The tool also features a Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) for patients to rate their overall health from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: From enrollment through treatment completion and up to 3 months of follow-up

  3. Range of motion measured with inclinometer

    The range of motion of the shoulder will be carried out using a digital inclinometer for the movements of flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation of the arm.

    Time frame: From enrollment through treatment completion and up to 3 months of follow-up

  4. Isometric strenght measured with isometric dynamometer (Lafayette 01655)

    Isometric strength will be assessed using the isometric dynamometer model Lafayette 01655 for the movements of elevation of the arm, and internal and external rotation of the glenohumeral joint

    Time frame: From enrollment through treatment completion and up to 3 months of follow-up

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07885878
Lead sponsor
University of Valladolid
Collaborators
European University of Tirana
Responsible party
Sandra Jiménez-del-Barrio (PhD, University of Valladolid) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Sandra Jiménez-del-Barrio, PhD
Contact
sandra.jimenez.barrio@uva.es
975 12 9166

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion