ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07883889TMJ-OSTUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Comparison of Three Osteotomy Techniques in Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis Surgery

An interventional study of Piezoelectric Surgical Device and Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel in Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis, sponsored by Ankara University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by Ankara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2022, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 20, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis is a condition in which the jaw joint becomes partially or completely fused, resulting in restricted mouth opening and difficulties with chewing, speaking, and daily activities. Surgical treatment aims to remove the ankylotic bone and restore normal jaw movement. Different bone-cutting devices can be used during surgery, but their effects on surgical efficiency, postoperative recovery, and quality of life may vary.

This prospective, non-randomized comparative clinical study aimed to compare three osteotomy techniques used in TMJ ankylosis surgery: piezoelectric surgery, an ultrasonic bone scalpel, and a conventional reciprocating saw.

A total of 32 patients undergoing TMJ ankylosis surgery were included. Eleven patients underwent surgery using a piezoelectric device, eleven using an ultrasonic bone scalpel, and ten using a conventional reciprocating saw. All surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon under general anesthesia using a standardized surgical protocol.

The primary outcome was osteotomy time, measured during surgery. Secondary outcomes included total operative time, intraoperative blood loss, maximum mouth opening, postoperative pain, facial nerve function, and patient-reported quality of life. Facial nerve function was evaluated using the House-Brackmann grading system and the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System. Quality of life was assessed using the SF-12, WHOQOL-BREF, OHIP-14, and UW-QOL questionnaires.

Patients were followed for six months after surgery to evaluate functional recovery and changes in quality of life. The study aimed to determine whether the choice of osteotomy device was associated with differences in surgical efficiency, early postoperative recovery, and patient-reported outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ankara University is the lead sponsor of 318 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-confirmed diagnosis of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis.

Scheduled to undergo primary TMJ ankylosis surgery.

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.

Ability to comply with the postoperative follow-up protocol.

Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent TMJ ankylosis.

Active systemic infection or malignancy.

Rheumatologic or neuromuscular disorders.

Inability to complete the questionnaires because of psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment.

Long-term opioid or immunosuppressive therapy.

Incomplete clinical records.

Failure to complete the follow-up protocol.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Piezoelectric Surgery

    Eleven patients underwent temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery using a piezoelectric surgical device (Mectron Medical Technology, Italy).

    Device: Piezoelectric Surgical Device

  • Experimental
    Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel

    Eleven patients underwent temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery using an ultrasonic bone scalpel (BoneScalpel, Misonix Inc., USA).

    Device: Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Reciprocating Saw

    Ten patients underwent temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery using a conventional reciprocating saw (S-8 R, W\&H, Austria).

    Device: Conventional Reciprocating Saw

Interventions

  • DevicePiezoelectric Surgical Device

    A piezoelectric surgical device (Mectron Medical Technology, Italy) was used to perform osteotomy during temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery. The device uses ultrasonic microvibrations to selectively cut mineralized bone tissue. Osteotomy was performed to facilitate removal of the ankylotic bone mass while minimizing injury to adjacent soft tissues. Eleven patients underwent surgery using this device.

    Also known as: Mectron Piezoelectric Surgery Device

  • DeviceUltrasonic Bone Scalpel

    An ultrasonic bone scalpel (BoneScalpel, Misonix Inc., USA) was used to perform osteotomy during temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery. The device uses ultrasonic vibrations for bone cutting and was applied to resect the ankylotic bone mass. Eleven patients underwent surgery using this device.

    Also known as: BoneScalpel, Misonix

  • DeviceConventional Reciprocating Saw

    A conventional reciprocating saw (S-8 R, W\&H, Austria) was used to perform osteotomy during temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery. The device uses a mechanically driven reciprocating blade to cut bone and facilitate resection of the ankylotic mass. Ten patients underwent surgery using this device.

    Also known as: S-8 R, W&H

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Osteotomy Time

    Osteotomy time was defined as the time required to complete osteotomy for resection of the ankylotic bone mass. The duration was measured in seconds using a digital stopwatch, from the initiation to the completion of osteotomy. Osteotomy times were compared among the piezoelectric surgery, ultrasonic bone scalpel, and conventional reciprocating saw groups.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively, during the index surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Operative Time

    Total operative time was recorded in minutes for each patient undergoing temporomandibular joint ankylosis surgery. Operative times were compared among the three osteotomy device groups.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively, during the index surgery.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry
    Ankara, Ankara 06560, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be made publicly available to protect patient confidentiality and privacy. The study involves sensitive clinical and patient-reported outcome data. Data sharing is restricted in accordance with the ethical approval and informed consent procedures of the study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07883889
Lead sponsor
Ankara University
Responsible party
Mehmet Emre Yurttutan (Associate Professor, Ankara University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
Start date
Apr 20, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 20, 2026
Completion
Jan 20, 2026
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion