ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07883473Updated Oct 20, 2026

Pudendal Nerve Block for Pain Relief During Episiotomy Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Pudendal Nerve Block and Conventional Local Perineal Infiltration in Episiotomy , Perineal Pain, sponsored by Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 20, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Episiotomy is a surgical cut made in the perineum, the area between the vagina and anus, during vaginal childbirth. Repairing an episiotomy can cause pain, and adequate pain relief is important for maternal comfort during and after delivery.

This study will compare two methods of providing anesthesia during episiotomy repair in women undergoing vaginal delivery with a mediolateral episiotomy at the Department of Maternal and Child Health (MCH), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, Pakistan.

A total of 80 eligible women will be enrolled and randomly assigned in equal numbers to two groups. The intervention group will receive a bilateral pudendal nerve block in addition to routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum pain relief. The control group will receive conventional local anesthetic infiltration around the episiotomy area, along with routine repair and standard postpartum pain relief.

Pain will be assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), on which 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst imaginable pain. Pain will be assessed during episiotomy repair and at 1, 3, and 6 hours after delivery.

The study will also compare the need for additional pain medication, pain during sitting and walking, patient comfort and satisfaction, the duration of episiotomy repair, the need for additional local anesthetic, and complications associated with the procedures.

The aim is to determine whether pudendal nerve block provides better pain relief during episiotomy repair and improves early postpartum comfort compared with conventional local anesthetic infiltration.

Read the detailed description

**Background and Rationale**

Episiotomy is a surgical incision of the perineum performed during vaginal childbirth. The procedure is followed by tissue repair and may be associated with acute perineal pain and discomfort during the early postpartum period. Pain may interfere with sitting, walking, and routine postpartum activities.

Conventional local anesthetic infiltration around the episiotomy site is commonly used during repair. However, adequate anesthesia may not always be achieved. Pudendal nerve block is a regional anesthetic technique that targets the pudendal nerve, which provides sensory innervation to much of the lower vagina, vulva, perineum, and anus. It may provide anesthesia to the tissues involved in episiotomy repair.

This study will compare pudendal nerve block with conventional local perineal infiltration to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing pain during episiotomy repair and improving early postpartum comfort.

**Study Design and Setting**

This is a randomized controlled, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at the Department of Maternal and Child Health (MCH), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, Pakistan.

The planned sample size is 80 women, with 40 participants allocated to each group. Eligible women will be recruited consecutively during the study period. Following eligibility assessment and informed consent, participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or control group.

The study duration is planned to be three months following institutional ethical approval, as stated in the study synopsis.

**Study Population**

The study population will consist of women aged 18 years or older who undergo vaginal delivery with a mediolateral episiotomy at MCH PIMS.

**Inclusion Criteria**

Participants must:

  1. Be aged 18 years or older.
  2. Have a singleton pregnancy.
  3. Have a vaginal delivery at MCH PIMS.
  4. Require a mediolateral episiotomy.
  5. Have an uncomplicated episiotomy requiring routine repair.
  6. Be able to understand the study information and provide written informed consent.

**Exclusion Criteria**

Women will be excluded if they have:

  1. An allergy or contraindication to the proposed local anesthetic.
  2. A known coagulation disorder or significant bleeding tendency.
  3. Local infection at the proposed injection site.
  4. An associated third- or fourth-degree perineal tear.
  5. An extensive vaginal or cervical laceration requiring additional anesthesia.
  6. Major postpartum hemorrhage or another major postpartum complication requiring urgent management.
  7. Chronic pelvic or perineal pain, or regular use of analgesic medication before delivery.
  8. An inability to understand the pain assessment scale or provide informed consent.

**Study Groups and Interventions**

Intervention Group: Participants will receive bilateral pudendal nerve block using the local anesthetic specified in the study protocol, in addition to routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia. The protocol describes the proposed use of 2% lidocaine, 2 mL, for pudendal nerve block. The procedure will be performed using a standardized technique by an appropriately trained obstetrician or anesthetist.

Control Group: Participants will receive conventional local perineal infiltration anesthesia according to the standard MCH PIMS episiotomy-repair protocol.

Both groups will receive routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia.

**Outcome Measures**

Primary Outcome:

The primary outcome is pain intensity during episiotomy repair, measured using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 represents no pain and 100 mm represents the worst imaginable pain. Pain assessments are planned at predefined stages of repair. The specific primary assessment stage should be consistent with the finalized study protocol.

Secondary Outcomes:

  1. Postpartum pain intensity measured using VAS at 1, 3, and 6 hours after delivery.
  2. Requirement for rescue analgesia during the first 6 hours postpartum.
  3. Time to first rescue analgesia and total rescue analgesic use during the first 6 hours.
  4. Pain during sitting and walking within the first 6 hours postpartum.
  5. Patient-reported comfort and satisfaction with pain management.
  6. Duration of episiotomy repair.
  7. Requirement for additional local anesthetic and success or failure of pudendal nerve block.
  8. Frequency of complications and adverse effects associated with the procedures.

**Safety Monitoring**

Potential complications associated with pudendal nerve block include injection-site pain or discomfort, local hematoma, infection, excessive bleeding, local anesthetic toxicity, temporary neurological symptoms, and inadequate block. Participants will be monitored for adverse effects, and clinically significant complications will be managed according to institutional protocols.

The procedure will be performed by appropriately trained personnel using the established technique and relevant precautions for local anesthetic administration.

**Data Collection and Statistical Analysis**

Data will be collected using a structured data collection proforma. Baseline information will include age, gravidity and parity, gestational age, delivery-related information, indication for episiotomy, and relevant obstetric or medical history. Procedural details, pain scores, rescue analgesia, comfort, satisfaction, and adverse events will also be documented.

Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables will be summarized using means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges, as appropriate. Categorical variables will be summarized using frequencies and percentages. Between-group comparisons will use appropriate statistical tests according to variable type and distribution. Repeated postoperative pain measurements will be analyzed using an appropriate repeated-measures method. A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

**Blinding**

Complete blinding of participants and the clinicians performing the procedures may not be feasible because the anesthetic techniques differ. Outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation where feasible, and coded group identifiers will be used for statistical analysis.

**Ethical Considerations**

Participation will be voluntary, and informed consent will be obtained before enrollment. Participants may withdraw from the study without affecting their routine clinical care. The study will be conducted in accordance with the approved institutional protocol and applicable ethical requirements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Episiotomy , Perineal Pain

Keywords

  • Pudendal nerve block Local anesthetic infiltration Postpartum pain Visual Analogue Scale
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Women aged 18 years or older.
  2. Singleton pregnancy.
  3. Vaginal delivery at the Department of Maternal and Child Health, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, with mediolateral episiotomy.
  4. Routine episiotomy repair.
  5. Able to understand the study information and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetic agents.

Coagulation disorder or significant bleeding tendency.

Local infection at the injection site.

Third- or fourth-degree perineal tear.

Extensive vaginal or cervical laceration requiring additional anesthesia.

Major postpartum hemorrhage or another major postpartum complication requiring urgent management.

Chronic pelvic or perineal pain, or regular analgesic use before delivery.

Inability to understand the pain assessment scale or provide informed consent.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pudendal Nerve Block Group

    Participants will receive bilateral pudendal nerve block using the local anesthetic specified in the study protocol, in addition to routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia. The protocol describes the use of 2% lidocaine, 2 mL, for the pudendal nerve block. The procedure will be performed by an appropriately trained obstetrician or anesthetist using a standardized technique.

    Procedure: Pudendal Nerve Block

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Local Infiltration Group

    Participants will receive conventional local perineal infiltration anesthesia according to the standard MCH PIMS episiotomy-repair protocol. Routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia will be provided.

    Procedure: Conventional Local Perineal Infiltration

Interventions

  • ProcedurePudendal Nerve Block

    Bilateral pudendal nerve block performed using the standardized technique specified in the study protocol, with the local anesthetic described in the protocol (2% lidocaine, 2 mL). The procedure will be performed by an appropriately trained obstetrician or anesthetist, in addition to routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia.

  • ProcedureConventional Local Perineal Infiltration

    Conventional local anesthetic infiltration around the episiotomy site according to the standard MCH PIMS episiotomy-repair protocol. Routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia will also be provided.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity during episiotomy repair

    Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 represents no pain and 100 mm represents the worst imaginable pain. Pain will be assessed at predefined stages during episiotomy repair, including after anesthesia administration, at commencement of repair, during repair, and at completion of repair.

    Time frame: During episiotomy repair

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postpartum pain intensity

    pain intensity measured using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 hours postpartum

  2. Requirement for rescue analgesia

    Proportion of participants requiring additional analgesic medication for inadequate episiotomy-related pain relief.

    Time frame: First 6 hours postpartum

  3. Patient satisfaction with pain management

    Patient satisfaction with pain management assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied.

    Time frame: 1-6 hours postpartum

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Maternal and Child Health (MCH), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS)
    Islamabad, ICT 04485, Pakistan
    • Zeenat Usman, MS obstetrics and Gyanecology · Contact · usmanbut2@gmail.com · +923315333910
    • Sobia Luqman, FCPS obstetrics and gyanecolog · Contact · sobialuqman8@gmail.com · +923348626904
    • Zeenat Usman, Ms Obsterics and gyanecology · Principal investigator
    • Sobia Luqman, FCPS-obstertics and gyanecolog · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aissaoui Y, Bruyere R, Mustapha H, Bry D, Kamili ND, Miller C. A randomized controlled trial of pudendal nerve block for pain relief after episiotomy. Anesth Analg. 2008 Aug;107(2):625-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ee48f. PubMed 18633043 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The decision regarding sharing individual participant data (IPD) has not yet been finalized. Any potential sharing will be considered in accordance with institutional policies, ethical approval requirements, participant confidentiality, and applicable data protection requirements. If data sharing is considered in the future, only appropriately de-identified data may be shared, subject to necessary institutional and ethical approvals.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 3 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2026
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 15, 2027
Last update
Oct 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07883473
Lead sponsor
Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University
Responsible party
Zeenat Usman (Medical Officer, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
Start date
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Study contacts

Zeenat Usman/Medical officier, MS obstetrics and gyanecology
Contact
usmanbut2@gmail.com
+923315333910
Sobia Luqman/Assisstant Professor, FCPS obstetrics and gyane
Contact
sobialuqman8@gmail.com
+923348626904

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion