ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07883031Updated Oct 20, 2026

Effects of Yerba Mate Supplementation on Metabolic Health, Physical Function, and Cognition in Older Adults With Excess Adiposity

An interventional study of Yerba Mate and Placebo in Overweight (BMI > 25) and Obesity & Overweight, sponsored by University of North Alabama. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by University of North Alabama · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2025, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 20, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to find out whether taking yerba mate, a plant-based supplement, could improve health in adults aged 60 years or older with excess body fat. Researchers examined how the body uses fat during walking, blood cholesterol levels, body composition, strength, mobility, thinking skills, and well-being. They also explored changes in inflammation, gene activity, and gut bacteria.

Participants took yerba mate capsules for six weeks and placebo capsules for six weeks, with a four-week break between the two periods. The placebo contained no yerba mate. The order was assigned by chance. Participants and the researchers conducting the tests did not know which capsules participants were taking during each period.

Participants completed blood tests, body measurements, walking tests, strength and mobility tests, thinking tasks, and questionnaires. Researchers compared the results from the yerba mate and placebo periods.

Read the detailed description

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study evaluated the physiological and molecular effects of yerba mate supplementation in older adults with excess adiposity. The study included two 6-week supplementation periods separated by a 4-week washout. Participants received yerba mate extract during one period and placebo during the other, in a randomized order. The crossover design allowed participants to serve as their own controls.

Clinical, functional, and cognitive assessments were conducted before and after each supplementation period. Laboratory testing included fasting blood collection, body composition assessment using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and indirect calorimetry during walking at standardized treadmill speeds to evaluate whole-body fat oxidation and walking economy. Physical function, muscle strength, cognitive performance, and self-reported health and well-being were also assessed.

Additional analyses examined circulating inflammatory markers, gene expression, and gut microbiota composition using samples collected at the end of each supplementation period. These analyses explored biological pathways potentially associated with the physiological responses to supplementation. Molecular analyses were performed in participant subsets according to sample availability.

Clinical outcomes were compared between supplementation conditions using measurements collected before and after each period. Inflammatory markers, gene expression, and gut microbiota outcomes were compared between conditions using end-of-period measurements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overweight (BMI > 25)
  • Obesity & Overweight

Keywords

  • Yerba mate
  • Ilex paraguariensis
  • older adults
  • overweight
  • gut microbiota
  • cognitive function
  • fat oxidation
  • inflammation
  • nutrigenomics
03

In context

Overweight

3,767 studies on the registry are indexed under Overweight; 863 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 73 across 3,263 interventional studies indexed under Overweight.

Browse Overweight studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Alabama is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age 60 years or older.

Excess adiposity, defined by meeting at least two of the following criteria: body mass index ≥25 kg/m²; waist-to-hip ratio ≥0.90 for males or ≥0.85 for females; body fat percentage ≥25% for males or ≥35% for females.

Ability to walk independently on a treadmill for at least 10 minutes.

Ability to complete computerized cognitive assessments independently.

Stable medication use for at least 3 months.

Habitual caffeine intake below 300 mg/day.

Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Major uncontrolled chronic disease.

Diagnosed neurodegenerative disease or cognitive impairment, or Montreal Cognitive Assessment score below 18.

Diagnosed psychiatric disorder or recent initiation of psychotropic medication.

Mobility limitations preventing completion of treadmill testing.

Uncontrolled hypertension, insulin-treated diabetes, or clinically significant hepatic or renal disease.

Untreated sleep apnea or cardiac arrhythmias requiring antiarrhythmic therapy.

Allergy to yerba mate or use of stimulant supplements.

Active smoking.

Antibiotic or probiotic use within the previous 3 months.

Vegan or vegetarian diet.

Physical activity exceeding 10 hours per week.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Yerba Mate

    Participants received yerba mate extract (six 500-mg capsules daily; 3,000 mg/day) for 6 weeks

    Dietary Supplement: Yerba Mate

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received placebo for 6 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementYerba Mate

    Yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis) extract administered orally as six 500-mg capsules daily (3,000 mg/day) for 6 weeks. The extract had a 6:1 extraction ratio and was standardized to 37-40% chlorogenic acids and no more than 2% caffeine.

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo

    Placebo administered orally as six capsules daily for 6 weeks, following the same dosing schedule as the yerba mate intervention.

    Also known as: Food starch

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fat Oxidation During Walking

    Whole-body fat oxidation rate (g/min), calculated from oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production measured by indirect calorimetry during standardized treadmill walking.

    Time frame: Before and after each 6-week supplementation period.

  2. Walking Economy

    Oxygen cost of walking, expressed in milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body mass per meter walked. The value is calculated by dividing mass-specific oxygen uptake in mL/kg/min by walking speed in meters per minute. Lower values indicate better walking economy.

    Time frame: Before and after each 6-week supplementation period.

  3. Fasting Triglycerides

    Fasting triglyceride concentration (mg/dL), assessed using the Cholestech LDX system.

    Time frame: Before and after each 6-week supplementation period.

  4. Psychomotor Vigilance Task Reaction Time

    Reaction time, expressed in milliseconds, during the computerized Psychomotor Vigilance Task, which assesses sustained attention and vigilance. Shorter reaction times indicate faster responses.

    Time frame: Before and after each 6-week supplementation period.

  5. Transcript Expression Fold Change

    Expression of protein-coding and noncoding transcripts assessed using the Affymetrix Clariom D human microarray. Differences between yerba mate and placebo supplementation conditions are expressed as fold changes in transcript expression, with results reported individually for each transcript.

    Time frame: At the end of each 6-week supplementation period.

  6. Eriksen Flanker Task Incongruent-Trial Reaction Time

    Reaction time, expressed in milliseconds, during incongruent trials of the computerized Eriksen Flanker Task, which assesses inhibitory control. Shorter reaction times indicate faster performance.

    Time frame: Before and after each 6-week supplementation period.

  7. Task-Switching Reaction Time

    Reaction time, expressed in milliseconds, during the computerized task-switching task, which assesses cognitive flexibility. Shorter reaction times indicate faster performance.

    Time frame: Before and after each 6-week supplementation period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fasting Blood Glucose

    Fasting blood glucose concentration (mg/dL), measured using the Cholestech LDX system.

    Time frame: Before and after each 6-week supplementation period.

  2. Blood Pressure

    Resting diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), measured using an automated upper-arm monitor after 5 minutes of seated rest.

    Time frame: Before and after each 6-week supplementation period.

  3. Interleukin-6 Relative Abundance Fold Change

    Relative plasma interleukin-6 abundance assessed using a cytokine antibody array. Results are expressed as the dimensionless ratio of normalized signal intensity after yerba mate to that after placebo. A ratio of 1 indicates equal abundance between conditions; values above 1 indicate higher abundance after yerba mate, and values below 1 indicate lower abundance compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  4. Relative Abundance of Gut Bacterial Taxa

    Relative abundance of bacterial taxa in stool samples assessed by sequencing the V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Results are expressed as percentages of bacterial sequencing reads assigned to each taxon, ranging from 0% to 100%. Higher percentages indicate greater relative representation of the taxon in the sample. Taxa are reported individually and compared between yerba mate and placebo supplementation conditions.

    Time frame: At the end of a 6-week supplementation period.

  5. Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Relative Abundance Fold Change

    Relative plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha abundance assessed using a cytokine antibody array. Results are expressed as the dimensionless ratio of normalized signal intensity after yerba mate to that after placebo. A ratio of 1 indicates equal abundance between conditions; values above 1 indicate higher abundance after yerba mate, and values below 1 indicate lower abundance compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  6. Interleukin-1 Beta Relative Abundance Fold Change

    Relative plasma interleukin-1 beta abundance assessed using a cytokine antibody array. Results are expressed as the dimensionless ratio of normalized signal intensity after yerba mate to that after placebo. A ratio of 1 indicates equal abundance between conditions; values above 1 indicate higher abundance after yerba mate, and values below 1 indicate lower abundance compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  7. Interleukin-10 Relative Abundance Fold Change

    Relative plasma interleukin-10 abundance assessed using a cytokine antibody array. Results are expressed as the dimensionless ratio of normalized signal intensity after yerba mate to that after placebo. A ratio of 1 indicates equal abundance between conditions; values above 1 indicate higher abundance after yerba mate, and values below 1 indicate lower abundance compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  8. Interferon Gamma Relative Abundance Fold Change

    Relative plasma interferon gamma abundance assessed using a cytokine antibody array. Results are expressed as the dimensionless ratio of normalized signal intensity after yerba mate to that after placebo. A ratio of 1 indicates equal abundance between conditions; values above 1 indicate higher abundance after yerba mate, and values below 1 indicate lower abundance compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  9. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Relative Abundance Fold Change

    Relative plasma monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, also known as C-C motif chemokine ligand 2, abundance assessed using a cytokine antibody array. Results are expressed as the dimensionless ratio of normalized signal intensity after yerba mate to that after placebo. A ratio of 1 indicates equal abundance between conditions; values above 1 indicate higher abundance after yerba mate, and values below 1 indicate lower abundance compared with placebo.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  10. Cognitive Failures Questionnaire Total Score

    Perceived cognitive failures assessed using the 25-item Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, yielding a total score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more frequent cognitive failures and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  11. World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index Score

    Psychological well-being assessed using the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index. Five items are scored from 0 to 5. The summed score is multiplied by four to obtain a final score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better psychological well-being.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  12. 15-Item Geriatric Depression Scale Total Score

    Depressive symptoms assessed using the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 15. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  13. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale Total Score

    Anxiety symptoms assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale. Each item is scored from 0 to 3, yielding a total score from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  14. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Global Score

    Sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Seven component scores, each ranging from 0 to 3, are summed to obtain a global score from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  15. Fatigue Severity Scale Total Score

    Fatigue severity and its impact on daily activities assessed using the nine-item Fatigue Severity Scale. Each item is scored from 1 to 7, yielding a total score from 9 to 63. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue and a worse outcome.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

  16. Brief Resilience Scale Mean Score

    Resilience assessed using the six-item Brief Resilience Scale. Items 2, 4, and 6 are reverse-scored, and the six item scores are averaged. The mean score ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater resilience and a better outcome.

    Time frame: After each 6-week supplementation period.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of North Alabama
    Florence, Alabama 35661, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is currently no plan to share individual participant data. Study findings will be disseminated through scientific publications and presentations using aggregate results.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2025 to primary completion in Jun 2026, 7 months.

Of 1,356 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Overweight, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 38. This study's 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,472 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 8, 2026
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
StartActual
Nov 15, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jun 16, 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 16, 2026
Last update
Oct 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07883031
Lead sponsor
University of North Alabama
Collaborators
North Carolina State University
Responsible party
Joice Lacruz (Principal Investigator, University of North Alabama) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
Start date
Nov 15, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 16, 2026
Completion
Jun 16, 2026
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion