ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07879625Joint InjectioUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Effects of Injection Combined With Spencer Technique on Painful Frozen Shoulder

An interventional study of Ultrasound-guided injection of sodium hyaluronate, ropivacaine hydrochloride, and compound betamethasone and spencer in Frozen Shoulder, sponsored by Zichao Zhang. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-19.

Sponsored by Zichao Zhang · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2025, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 19, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

### What is this study about?

This study compared whether adding the **Spencer muscle energy technique (MET)** versus conventional rehabilitation, following identical ultrasound-guided intra-articular corticosteroid-hyaluronate injection, improves shoulder outcomes for patients with painful-phase frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis).

### Why does it matter?

Frozen shoulder causes shoulder pain and marked loss of range of motion, greatly impairing daily function and quality of life. The painful "freezing" phase is dominated by inflammation and pain-driven muscle guarding. Intra-articular injection can deliver short-term pain relief but cannot mechanically stretch contracted joint capsules; it therefore works best as a platform for subsequent rehabilitation.

Although the Spencer muscle energy technique is widely used clinically for frozen-shoulder rehabilitation, prior trials often combined it with variable injection protocols and lacked direct comparison against standard rehabilitation. It remained unclear whether any observed benefits came from the injection itself or from the manual therapy technique. This trial fixed the injection and pain neuroscience education for both groups, isolating the effect of the manual therapy approach.

### What did the researchers do?

Patients with unilateral painful-phase primary frozen shoulder were randomised into two groups. All participants received one ultrasound-guided glenohumeral and subacromial bursa injection (corticosteroid, hyaluronate, ropivacaine and normal saline), plus standardised pain neuroscience education.

  • **Spencer group (n=33):** 8-week programme of Spencer muscle energy technique
  • **Control group (n=31):** 8-week conventional rehabilitation (joint mobilisation, manual therapy and stretching)
  • Outcomes were assessed at **baseline, 8-weeks (end-of-treatment), and 24-week follow-up**
  • Primary outcome: shoulder function measured by the Constant-Murley score
  • Secondary measures: pain (NRS), kinesiophobia (TSK-17), mental quality-of-life (SF-36 MCS), active shoulder range of motion, and ultrasound thickness of the coracohumeral ligament and inferior glenohumeral capsule
  • Outcome assessors and data analysts were blinded to group allocation; safety and adverse events were monitored throughout the trial.
02

Conditions studied

  • Frozen Shoulder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • frozen shoulder
03

In context

Bursitis

417 studies on the registry are indexed under Bursitis; 112 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is above the median of 45 across 376 interventional studies indexed under Bursitis.

Browse Bursitis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Zichao Zhang as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-70 years
  • Willing to undergo randomization
  • Diagnosis of primary idiopathic frozen shoulder; diagnosis confirmed by the primary author, defined as limited active and passive shoulder range of motion, with characteristic restricted passive external rotation (\<50%) at both 0° and 90° elbow flexion relative to the contralateral shoulder

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Secondary frozen-shoulder (e.g., post-traumatic, secondary to prolonged immobilization)
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous surgical treatment for frozen shoulder
  • Cervical-origin shoulder symptoms (screened via comprehensive cervical assessment including Spurling's test, cervical distraction test, neurologic examination: reflexes, sensory assessment, muscle strength testing, evaluation for muscle wasting; imaging performed when clinically indicated)
  • Other shoulder pathologies ruled out by plain radiography (true anteroposterior [Grashey view], lateral scapular Y-view, axillary view) and shoulder magnetic resonance imaging as clinically indicated
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    spencer group

    The Spencer group received physiotherapist-administered standardized Spencer muscle energy technique (MET) on the same schedule as controls. This sequential manual therapy uses targeted shoulder positioning, gentle voluntary sub-maximal isometric contraction and post-isometric relaxation to reduce muscle spasm and improve shoulder range of motion. All participants across both arms obtained the same ultrasound-guided injection and standardized pain neuroscience education.

    Drug: Ultrasound-guided injection of sodium hyaluronate, ropivacaine hydrochloride, and compound betamethasone · Procedure: spencer

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Participants in the control group received conventional rehabilitation on the same schedule, including conventional manual therapy, joint mobilization, and stretching exercises, delivered by physiotherapists according to standardized protocols. The two groups therefore differed in the manual-therapy modality (Spencer MET versus conventional manual therapy), while sharing the injection, the pain neuroscience education, and the home-exercise schedule.

    Drug: Ultrasound-guided injection of sodium hyaluronate, ropivacaine hydrochloride, and compound betamethasone · Procedure: conventional rehabilitation

Interventions

  • DrugUltrasound-guided injection of sodium hyaluronate, ropivacaine hydrochloride, and compound betamethasone

    All participants received a single ultrasound-guided injection administered by the same qualified rehabilitation physician after baseline assessment. The injectate comprised 10 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution, sodium hyaluronate injection (25 mg; ARTZDispo), ropivacaine hydrochloride (100 mg; Naropin), and compound betamethasone injection (7 mg; Diprospan), with a total volume of 20 mL. Of this volume, 15 mL was injected into the glenohumeral joint and 5 mL into the subacromial bursa. No repeat injections were administered. Both groups received the same pain neuroscience education and completed an 8-week treatment period, with follow-up through 24 weeks.

  • Procedurespencer

    The technique comprises a sequence of specific positioning, gentle voluntary isometric contraction, and post-isometric relaxation applied to the shoulder in a defined order, aimed at lengthening shortened muscle and fascia, normalizing joint range, and reducing muscle spasm. Treatment frequency and duration followed the standardized operating protocol of the department.

  • Procedureconventional rehabilitation

    participants received standardized physiotherapist-led conventional rehabilitation with the same schedule as the intervention group, including: (1) conventional manual therapy: soft-tissue massage and trigger-point release for perishoulder muscle spasm; (2) Maitland-grade glenohumeral joint mobilization (traction, glides) to enhance capsular mobility; (3) static stretching exercises of shoulder girdle muscles to lengthen tight soft tissues and preserve range of motion. All subjects received identical ultrasound-guided injection and pain neuroscience education.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Constant-Murley score

    Constant-Murley score, full name Constant-Murley Shoulder Score, ranges from 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates better overall shoulder function.

    Time frame: CMS was administered at baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks.

  2. Numerical Rating Scale

    NRS, full name Numeric Rating Scale, ranges from 0 to 10, and a higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: at baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. the 17-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

    TSK-17, full name Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-17, ranges from 17 to 68, and a higher score indicates worse kinesiophobia.

    Time frame: TSK-17 was administered at baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks.

  2. Mental health-related quality

    SF-36 MCS, full name 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary, ranges from 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates better mental-health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: SF-36 was administered at baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks.

  3. Active shoulder ROM

    Active shoulder ROM, full name active shoulder range of motion (including flexion, abduction, external rotation, internal rotation), measured in degrees, and a higher value indicates greater shoulder mobility.

    Time frame: ROM was administered at baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks.

  4. the coracohumeral ligament (CHL)

    CHL, full name coracohumeral ligament, measured in millimetres, and a higher thickness value indicates more severe soft-tissue fibrosis.

    Time frame: CHL was administered at baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks.

  5. the inferior glenohumeral capsule

    IGHC, full name inferior glenohumeral capsule, measured in millimetres, and a higher thickness value indicates more severe capsular fibrosis.

    Time frame: IGHC was administered at baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Qingdao Municipal Hospital
    Qingdao, Shandong 266001, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2025 to primary completion in Aug 2026, 14 months.

Of 233 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bursitis, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 16. This study's 14 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 233 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 16.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 5, 2026
First posted
Oct 19, 2026
StartActual
Jun 3, 2025
Primary completionActual
Aug 14, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 26, 2026
Last update
Oct 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 19, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 19, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07879625
Lead sponsor
Zichao Zhang
Responsible party
Zichao Zhang (Junior Physical Therapist, Qingdao Municipal Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2026
Start date
Jun 3, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 14, 2026
Completion
Oct 26, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 19, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion