ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07871474Updated Oct 13, 2026

Development and Evaluation of an Emergency Nursing Care Training Program Focusing on CPR and Triage for the Lao People's Democratic Republic

An interventional study of Emergency Nursing Training Program in Emergency Nursing Education, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Triage Training, sponsored by Inje University. Completed at 1 site in Laos. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.

Sponsored by Inje University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 13, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
37
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In low- and middle-income countries, particularly the Lao People's Democratic Republic, limited infrastructure and constrained educational access create competency gaps and limited training opportunities for emergency nurses. As existing evidence primarily involves high-resource settings, its applicability to low-resource settings is limited. Therefore, an Official Development Assistance-derived, culturally tailored emergency nursing training program was developed for the Lao People's Democratic Republic, and its effectiveness will be evaluated. This quasi-experimental study will used a single-group pre-test-post-test design, with data collected using practical performance assessments and self-administered surveys. The six-session program (three lectures and three activities) will be preceded by pre-learning videos and handouts to standardize baseline knowledge. Guided by Kirkpatrick's model, the outcomes include program satisfaction (Level 1: Reaction), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and triage knowledge (Level 2: Learning), CPR core skills, triage skills, and emergency nurses' professional competency (Level 3: Behavior). Continuous data will be analyzed using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, depending on normality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emergency Nursing Education
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training
  • Triage Training
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Inje University is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthcare providers (such as nurses or emergency care personnel) participating in the emergency nursing training program
  • Individuals who voluntarily agreed to complete the pre- and post-intervention evaluations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Incomplete questionnaire responses or failure to complete both pre- and post-intervention assessments

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    Participants who completed the emergency nursing training program, including CPR and triage education.

    Behavioral: Emergency Nursing Training Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralEmergency Nursing Training Program

    A comprehensive training workshop designed to improve emergency care competencies, consisting of CPR training and triage education tailored to the clinical context.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in CPR Knowledge Score Assessed by the Adapted NREMT CPR Knowledge Instrument

    Evaluated using a 10-item instrument adapted from the National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (NREMT) CPR quiz tool to reflect local clinical practices, including pediatric resuscitation. Each correctly answered item is awarded 1 point. Total scores range from 0 to 10 points, where higher scores indicate greater cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

  2. Change in Triage Knowledge Score Assessed by the Structured Triage Knowledge Questionnaire

    Assessed using a 13-item structured knowledge questionnaire covering triage definition (1 item), color-coded acuity systems (4 items), and priority classification based on patient presentation (8 items). Each correct response receives 1 point. Total scores range from 0 to 13 points, where higher scores represent higher triage knowledge.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in CPR Core Skill Performance Score Assessed by the Adapted Cardiac Arrest Management Skill Checklist

    Evaluated using a 13-item observational checklist adapted from the NREMT Cardiac Arrest Management Skill Sheet. The tool assesses patient assessment, emergency activation, chest compressions, ventilation accuracy, and minimization of interruptions. Total scores range from 0 to 13 points, where higher scores reflect superior CPR procedural performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

  2. Change in Triage Skill Score Assessed by the Modified Triage Skills Questionnaire

    Assessed using the 36-item modified Triage Skills Questionnaire (TSQ) based on Fathoni et al., comprising rapid assessment, patient categorization, and patient allocation domains. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Total scores range from 36 to 180, where higher scores indicate greater triage proficiency.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

  3. Change in Emergency Nurses' Professional Competency Assessed by the Triage Nurses' Professional Capability Questionnaire

    Assessed using the Triage Nurses' Professional Capability Questionnaire developed by Bijani et al., comprising clinical competence (20 items), psychological empowerment (6 items), and professional commitment (9 items). All 35 items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Total scores range from 35 to 175, with higher scores reflecting greater professional competency.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention (Day 1)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National University of Laos
    Vientiane, Xaythany District 7322, Laos
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2025 to primary completion in Jan 2025, 0 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 1, 2026
First posted
Oct 13, 2026
StartActual
Jan 17, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jan 17, 2025
CompletionActual
Jan 17, 2025
Last update
Oct 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 13, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07871474
Lead sponsor
Inje University
Collaborators
National Research Foundation of Korea
Responsible party
Seohyun Won (Guest Professor, Inje University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2026
Start date
Jan 17, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 17, 2025
Completion
Jan 17, 2025
Last update
Oct 13, 2026

Study contacts

Seohyun Won, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Inje University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion