ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07870252POST-MUCOSAL RUpdated Oct 15, 2026

Pharyngeal Mucosal Conditioning to Prevent Postoperative Sore Throat in Septoplasty Patients With Severe Nasal Obstruction

An interventional study of Nebulized 0.9% Normal Saline and Water-Soluble Lubricant Gel on Endotracheal Tube in Postoperative Sore Throat, Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty, sponsored by Mansoura University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 13, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Postoperative sore throat (POST) affects 21-65% of patients after endotracheal intubation and is among the most common complaints after general anesthesia. Patients presenting for septoplasty with severe nasal obstruction (NOSE score ≥55) are habitual chronic mouth-breathers, having bypassed nasal air conditioning for months to years preoperatively. This produces a documented state of pharyngeal mucosal dehydration and inflammation that precedes any surgical event - making these patients a distinct high-risk subgroup for POST that has never been identified or studied.

This double-blind RCT will test whether a simple, low-cost multimodal pharyngeal mucosal conditioning strategy - nebulized 0.9% normal saline (5 mL over 15 minutes, 30 minutes before induction) combined with a water-soluble lubricant gel applied to the endotracheal tube - reduces POST incidence and severity compared to standard care (sham nebulization plus plain water on the ETT).

105 adults aged 18-60 years with NOSE score ≥55 scheduled for elective septoplasty under general anesthesia will be randomized 1:1. The primary outcome is POST incidence at 1 hour post-extubation assessed by a blinded PACU nurse. Secondary outcomes include POST severity (VAS 0-10) at 1h, 6h, and 24h; hoarseness; dysphagia; PONV; time to first analgesic; and preoperative pharyngeal mucosal hydration measured by the Modified Schirmer Test.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Existing literature on POST in nasal surgery treats all septoplasty patients as homogeneous, regardless of nasal obstruction severity. Patients with severe obstruction (NOSE score ≥55) are chronic mouth-breathers who bypass normal nasal air humidification, producing measurable pharyngeal mucosal dehydration, epithelial thinning, and chronic dry inflammation - a pre-existing vulnerability amplified by intubation and throat pack placement.

INTERVENTION:

Group A (Intervention): Nebulized 0.9% NaCl (5 mL, 15 min via compressor jet nebulizer, particle size 2-5 µm) administered 30 minutes pre-induction with patient breathing through mouth; plus water-soluble lubricant gel (K-Y Jelly or equivalent) applied to ETT cuff and distal 5 cm.

Group B (Control): Sham nebulization (room air, identical device and duration); ETT lubricated with plain water only.

STANDARDIZED PROTOCOL (both groups):

Induction: propofol 1.5-2 mg/kg + fentanyl 1-2 µg/kg + rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Maintenance: sevoflurane 1.0-1.5 MAC in O2/Air (no nitrous oxide). ETT cuff maintained at 20-25 cmH2O (checked every 30 minutes by calibrated aneroid manometer). Standardized saline-soaked throat pack for all patients. Awake extubation with single gentle suction.

NOVEL ELEMENTS:

  1. First RCT to enroll nasal surgery patients specifically by NOSE score severity
  2. First study to test preoperative mucosal conditioning as a POST prevention strategy in chronic mouth-breathers
  3. Preoperative mucosal hydration measured by Modified Schirmer Test and VAS dryness score before and after nebulization

RANDOMIZATION AND BLINDING:

Computer-generated block randomization (variable blocks of 4 and 6), stratified by NOSE severity (55-75 vs 80-100). Allocation concealed via sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. Outcome assessor and patient blinded; anesthesiologist not blinded but is not the outcome assessor.

SAMPLE SIZE:

n=105 (52-53/group); 80% power; two-sided alpha=0.05; anticipated 65% POST incidence in control group; clinically meaningful absolute reduction of 35%; 15% dropout allowance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Sore Throat
  • Nasal Obstruction
  • Septoplasty

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Postoperative sore throat
  • POST prevention
  • Nasal obstruction
  • NOSE score
  • Septoplasty
  • Pharyngeal mucosal conditioning
  • Nebulized saline
  • Endotracheal tube lubrication
  • Lubricant gel
  • Chronic mouth breathing
  • General anesthesia
  • Throat pack
03

In context

Nasal Obstruction

111 studies on the registry are indexed under Nasal Obstruction; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 105 is above the median of 52 across 82 interventional studies indexed under Nasal Obstruction.

Browse Nasal Obstruction studies →

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,114 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 60 years
  • ASA physical status I or II
  • NOSE score ≥55 (severe or extreme nasal obstruction category) at preoperative assessment
  • Duration of nasal obstruction symptoms ≥6 months
  • Scheduled for elective septoplasty ± turbinoplasty under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation
  • Mallampati class I or II
  • BMI ≤35 kg/m²
  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past smoker (any amount)
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)
  • Known pharyngeal or laryngeal pathology
  • Active upper respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks of scheduled surgery
  • Preoperative sore throat or baseline pharyngeal pain at time of assessment
  • Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati class III-IV, mouth opening less than 3 cm)
  • ACE inhibitor use (causes dry cough, confounds POST assessment)
  • Concurrent tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, or rhinoplasty extending operative time beyond 90 minutes
  • Known allergy to lubricant gel components
  • Severe systemic disease affecting mucosal hydration (Sjögren's syndrome, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Previous participation in this study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
105 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A - Multimodal Pharyngeal Mucosal Conditioning

    Nebulized 0.9% normal saline (5 mL over 15 minutes via compressor jet nebulizer, particle size 2-5 µm) administered 30 minutes before anesthetic induction with patient breathing through the mouth; followed by water-soluble lubricant gel (K-Y Jelly or equivalent) applied uniformly to the ETT cuff and distal 5 cm immediately before intubation.

    Device: Nebulized 0.9% Normal Saline · Device: Water-Soluble Lubricant Gel on Endotracheal Tube

  • Sham comparator
    Group B - Standard Care (Sham Control)

    Sham nebulization using an identical compressor device delivering room air only (15 minutes, same duration and posture as active arm); ETT lubricated with plain water only - current institutional standard practice.

    Device: Sham Nebulization

Interventions

  • DeviceNebulized 0.9% Normal Saline

    0.9% Normal saline 5 mL nebulized over 15 minutes via compressor jet nebulizer (target particle size 2-5 µm) administered 30 minutes before anesthetic induction, with patient breathing normally through the mouth to maximize pharyngeal deposition.

  • DeviceWater-Soluble Lubricant Gel on Endotracheal Tube

    Water-soluble lubricant gel (K-Y Jelly or bioequivalent) applied uniformly to the ETT cuff outer surface and distal 5 cm of the ETT shaft immediately before endotracheal intubation.

  • DeviceSham Nebulization

    Identical compressor nebulizer device delivering room air only, operated for 15 minutes. Device produces the same sound and airflow as the active nebulizer. No saline delivered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat (POST) at 1 Hour Post-Extubation

    POST assessed by a blinded PACU nurse using a validated 4-point categorical scale: 0 = no sore throat; 1 = mild (only on direct questioning, no analgesic required); 2 = moderate (spontaneous complaint, non-opioid analgesic given); 3 = severe (spontaneous complaint, opioid analgesic required). POST is considered present if score ≥1.

    Time frame: 1 hour after extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. POST Severity - Visual Analogue Scale

    POST severity scored on VAS 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst imaginable pain) by blinded assessor at 1h, 6h, and 24h.

    Time frame: 1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours post-extubation

  2. Incidence and Severity of Hoarseness

    1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours post-extubation

    Time frame: Hoarseness graded 0-3 (0=none; 1=mild/perceived only; 2=moderate/noticed by others; 3=severe/aphonia).

  3. Incidence and Severity of Dysphagia

    Dysphagia graded 0-3 (0=none; 1=mild; 2=moderate/significant difficulty; 3=severe/unable to swallow).

    Time frame: 1 hour and 6 hours post-extubation

  4. Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

    Time frame: 6 hours and 24 hours post-extubation

  5. Time to First Analgesic Request for Throat Pain

    Time in minutes from extubation to first patient-initiated request for analgesia specifically for throat pain.

    Time frame: From extubation to 24 hours post-extubation

  6. Preoperative Pharyngeal Mucosal Hydration

    Mucosal hydration measured by patient VAS dryness score (0-10). Measured before and after nebulization to confirm intervention effect.

    Time frame: Before and after nebulization/sham, approximately 30-40 minutes pre-induction

  7. Patient Satisfaction with Recovery

    Numerical Rating Scale 0-10 (0=completely unsatisfied, 10=completely satisfied).

    Time frame: 24 hours post-extubation

  8. Dose-Response Correlation - NOSE Score and POST Severity

    Exploratory Pearson/Spearman correlation between preoperative NOSE score (continuous variable) and POST VAS across both groups

    Time frame: 24 hours (pooled data)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Qassim University Medical City
    Buraidah, Al-Qassim Region 51452, Saudi Arabia
08

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 13, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: identifiers
  2. Oct 13, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07870252
Responsible party
Mohamed Ahmed Tolba (Assistant Professor, Mansoura University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Study contacts

Mohamed Ahmed Tolba, MD
Contact
m_atolba1234@mans.edu.eg
00966507439018
Omar Saleh Al Misnid, MD
Contact
O.almisnid@qu.edu.sa
00966561205555
Mohamed Ahmed Tolba, MD
principal investigator · Mansoura University - Qassim University Medical City

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion