ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07868133NERVE-COMBATUpdated Oct 9, 2026

Nerve Blocks or Combat Trauma: What Drives Peripheral Nerve Injury?

An observational study in Combat-Related Limb Injury, Nerve Block and Nerve Damage, sponsored by Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy · Observational

Updated Oct 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine nerve problems after combat-related injuries to the arms or legs. Some patients receive a peripheral nerve block, an injection of local anaesthetic near a nerve, to help control pain. However, combat injuries themselves can damage nerves through blast effects, fractures, blood vessel injury, bleeding, infection, surgery, or use of a tourniquet.

The study will follow adults with combat-related limb injuries who receive routine care at a specialised trauma centre. Treatment will not be assigned by the study. Researchers will record details of the injury, pain treatment, nerve block use, and nerve function over time.

The main goal is to determine how often patients have new or worsened numbness, weakness, or nerve pain after injury, and whether these problems are more closely related to the injury itself, the nerve block, or several factors together. The findings may help clinicians provide safer pain treatment and recognise nerve problems earlier.

Read the detailed description

Combat-related limb trauma is frequently accompanied by peripheral nerve injury. Neurological symptoms identified after trauma may result from the original injury, blast effects, fractures, vascular compromise, tourniquet exposure, haematoma, infection, surgery, or pain treatment. Peripheral nerve blocks are commonly used for analgesia, but determining whether a later neurological deficit is related to the block, the injury, or multiple factors is often difficult.

This prospective observational cohort study will collect routine clinical data from adults with combat-related upper- or lower-limb trauma. The study will not assign or alter treatment. Peripheral nerve blocks, surgical care, imaging, rehabilitation, and pharmacological analgesia will be provided according to clinical need and local practice.

Investigators will document injury characteristics, neurological findings before and after analgesia when feasible, regional anaesthesia details, pain outcomes, relevant imaging and follow-up neurological status. Participants with a persistent or worsening neurological deficit will undergo structured multidisciplinary case review. Events will be classified as trauma-associated, possibly block-associated, multifactorial, or indeterminate.

The study aims to describe neurological outcomes after combat limb trauma and identify factors associated with persistent deficits. The findings may support safer regional anaesthesia practice, improve documentation of baseline nerve function, and strengthen pathways for early recognition and referral of peripheral nerve injury.

02

Conditions studied

  • Combat-Related Limb Injury
  • Nerve Block
  • Nerve Damage
  • Nerve Blocks
  • Neurological Complications

Keywords

  • Peripheral nerve block;
  • Regional anaesthesia
  • Combat trauma
  • Peripheral nerve injury
  • Neurological complications
  • Limb trauma
  • Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia
  • Pain management
03

In context

Peripheral Nerve Injuries

91 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Nerve Injuries; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 66 across 24 observational studies indexed under Peripheral Nerve Injuries.

Browse Peripheral Nerve Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults with combat-related upper- or lower-limb trauma treated at a specialised Ukrainian war trauma centre. The population includes patients with blast- or ballistic-related injuries, fractures, soft-tissue injury, vascular injury, traumatic amputation, or complex reconstructive needs. Patients may receive ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks or routine non-regional analgesia as part of standard clinical care.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Combat-related traumatic injury of an upper or lower limb, including blast- or ballistic-related injury.
  • Admission to, or treatment at, the study centre during the defined study period.
  • Available clinical documentation of injury characteristics and neurological assessment sufficient for outcome evaluation.
  • Receipt of routine trauma care with or without an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing neurological disease or documented chronic peripheral neuropathy that prevents reliable assessment of a new trauma-related neurological deficit.
  • Isolated injuries without involvement of an upper or lower limb.
  • Missing or insufficient medical-record data on injury characteristics, analgesia exposure, or neurological outcome.
  • Death before neurological outcome assessment.
  • Withdrawal of consent, where consent is required by the ethics committee.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Peripheral Nerve Block Group

    Adults with combat-related upper- or lower-limb trauma who received an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block as part of routine clinical care. Blocks may be single-injection techniques or continuous peripheral nerve catheters. The study does not assign the block or modify clinical treatment; it records routinely delivered analgesia and subsequent neurological outcomes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with persistent peripheral neurological deficit at 90 days after injury

    Persistent peripheral neurological deficit will be assessed at 90 days after injury by clinical neurological examination and documented as present or absent, including sensory loss, motor weakness, or neuropathic symptoms attributable to peripheral nerve injury.

    Time frame: Mean Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength score at 90 days after injury

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with early peripheral neurological deficit within 72 hours after injury

    Early peripheral neurological deficit will be assessed within 72 hours after injury by clinical neurological examination and recorded as present or absent. Deficit includes sensory loss, motor weakness, or neuropathic symptoms consistent with peripheral nerve injury.

    Time frame: 48 to 72 hours after the index injury.

  2. Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity at rest and during movement measured on the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale.

    Time frame: 48 to 72 hours and 90 days after the index injury.

  3. Attribution of Persistent Neurological Deficit

    Multidisciplinary classification of persistent neurological deficits as trauma-associated, possibly peripheral nerve block-associated, multifactorial, or indeterminate.

    Time frame: 90 days after the index injury.

  4. Number of participants with a regional anaesthesia-related safety event within 48 hours after block placement

    Regional anaesthesia-related safety events will be recorded from block placement until 48 hours afterwards and reported as present or absent. Events include local anaesthetic systemic toxicity, clinically significant bleeding or haematoma, infection, persistent paraesthesia or motor deficit, nerve injury, vascular puncture, pneumothorax, or unplanned escalation of care attributable to the procedure.

    Time frame: From peripheral nerve block placement to 72 hours after the index injury.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because the study includes sensitive clinical and conflict-related information. Protecting participant confidentiality and operational security is essential. De-identified aggregate results may be available in publications and, where appropriate, further information may be considered after ethics and data-governance review.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2026, 0 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 30, 2026
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2026
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07868133
Lead sponsor
Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy
Responsible party
Dmytro Dmytriiev (professor, head of intensive care department, Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
Start date
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Dmyto Dmytriiev, PhD.Professor
Contact
dmytrodmytriiev@gmail.com
0674309449

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion