An interventional study of Teaching preparation in Educators, sponsored by October 6 University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 23 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.
Sponsored by October 6 University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The education sector is no behind as the intelligentsia of AI enthusiasts march in their fortress of innovation. Generative AI, a sort of AI, is what is called the generated personalized learning content, which movable is according to the student's needs and level. Demonstration on that analyzing data of students, for instance, learning style, performance reviews and the engagement level, generative AI will be empowered to personalize learning materials in accordance with the individual student' strengths and learning habits. The offering of adaptive AI for individualized learning keeps one remarkable benefit that pupils will be able to manage and comprehend the content provided with appropriate difficulty according to the performance of learners
October 6 University is the lead sponsor of 142 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Professor who can use ChatGPT
Other: Teaching preparation
Professor who cannot use ChatGpt
Other: Teaching preparation
Teaching preparation (Time-Based Measures, Quality Process Measures, Preparedness Indicators)
Self-reported time spent on teaching preparation, in hours per week
Participants report, on one numeric questionnaire item, the average number of hours per week they spent preparing teaching during the current academic semester. Teaching preparation is defined as planning lectures and practical sessions, developing slides and handouts, and writing assessments. Data will be reported as mean hours per week and compared between participants who use artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots for teaching preparation at least weekly and those who do not. Lower values indicate less time spent on preparation.
Time frame: Day 1 (single cross-sectional survey completed at enrollment; recall period is the current academic semester)
Teaching self-efficacy as assessed by the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) short form mean score
The Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale short form measures how capable a teacher feels in instructional strategies, student engagement and classroom management. It has 12 items (4 per subscale). Each item is rated on a 9-point scale from 1 (nothing) to 9 (a great deal). The total score is the mean of the 12 items. Possible scores range from 1 to 9, with higher scores indicating greater teaching self-efficacy (a better outcome).
Time frame: Day 1 (single cross-sectional survey completed at enrollment)
Ran from Jan 2026 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 3 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.