ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07866417ReviMedUpdated Oct 8, 2026

Implementation of Virtual Reality in Nuclear Medicine

An interventional study of ReviMed group and Control Group (A): in Virtual Reality, sponsored by Fundacion Miguel Servet. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 2 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.

Sponsored by Fundacion Miguel Servet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Mar 2026).
Updated Oct 8, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Introduction: In the field of medicine, diagnostic tests are essential for the early detection and effective treatment of various diseases. However, these tests often cause patients significant pain and anxiety, which can affect their experience and their willingness to undergo future medical procedures. The use of Virtual Reality can mitigate these effects, improving the experience and thereby the cooperation of patients undergoing painful and complex procedures.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of using Virtual Reality on pain and anxiety in patients undergoing a complex diagnostic procedure.

Method: A randomized, parallel-group, 1:1 (control/intervention) superiority trial comparing the use of the conventional technique (Group 1) with the ReViMed technique (Group 2) via random assignment, with a sample size of 72 pediatric patients and 110 adult patients for each arm. The M-YPAS scale will be used to measure anxiety levels in children, and the DASS-21 for anxiety in adult patients; the pain assessment scale for all participants will be the EVA-VAS.

Impact: The implementation of VR use represents an effective distraction process for reducing anxiety and pain experienced by patients undergoing highly complex diagnostic tests.

Read the detailed description

In the field of medicine, diagnostic tests are essential for the early detection and effective treatment of various diseases. However, these tests often cause patients significant pain and anxiety, which can affect their experience and their willingness to undergo future medical procedures. In this context, virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising tool for reducing both the pain and anxiety associated with diagnostic tests in both adult and pediatric patients.

VR is a technology that allows users to immerse themselves in computer-generated virtual environments, creating a sense of presence and active participation in a simulated world. Through devices such as virtual reality headsets and motion controllers, users can interact with these environments and experience realistic sensations.

Medical diagnostic and therapeutic tests often involve invasive procedures, physical discomfort, or stressful clinical environments. These factors can generate high levels of pain and anxiety in patients, affecting their emotional well-being and their willingness to cooperate during the procedure. Reducing these negative experiences is crucial for improving the quality of medical care and enabling greater patient cooperation with the procedure to be performed. Several studies have shown that VR can have a positive impact on pain reduction. By distracting the patient's attention and immersing them in a pleasant and relaxing virtual environment, virtual reality can reduce the perception of pain and improve the pain tolerance threshold. Furthermore, the ability to customize virtual environments allows the experience to be tailored to each patient's individual needs and preferences.

VR has also proven effective in reducing anxiety associated with these procedures. By providing a safe and controlled virtual environment, VR can help patients relax, better adapt to the setting, and lower their anxiety levels. Furthermore, gradual exposure to specific medical situations or procedures through virtual reality can help patients become familiar with and desensitized to them, thereby reducing anticipatory anxiety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Virtual Reality

Keywords

  • pain
  • anxiety
03

In context

Pain

2,450 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 945 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 250 is above the median of 70 across 2,101 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundacion Miguel Servet is the lead sponsor of 47 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

As selection criteria, any case in which the patient's user or guardians, after being informed of the study's participation, do not agree to the patient's inclusion or refuse to give consent will be considered an exclusion criterion. Likewise, all patients with significant visual field impairment and severe facial injury or impairment, as well as those undergoing diagnostic tests involving the head and neck-such as parathyroid scintigraphy, salivary gland scintigraphy, DATScan, brain SPECT, and thyroid scintigraphy-will be excluded from the study.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  • Diagnostic bone, renal, or perfusion-ventilation scintigraphy
  • Glasgow Coma Scale >13
  • Adequate communication skills and understanding of the primary language (Spanish or English)
  • Age over 2 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Intolerance to devices in the facial area
  • Facial malformation
  • Acute or significant visual impairment
  • Dizziness or discomfort prior to the test
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
250 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    control group

    baseline nuclear medicine imaging without sedation, anxiolytics, or the administration of a relaxant

    Other: Control Group (A):

  • Experimental
    Revimed group

    Virtual reality implementation

    Other: ReviMed group

Interventions

  • OtherReviMed group

    Incorporation of an interactive experience using virtual reality headsets and 360-degree video projections accompanied by long-form relaxing background music

  • OtherControl Group (A):

    no action

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. anxiety

    The Spanish version of the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (m-YPAS) (EAPY-m, translated into Spanish) will be used (Jerez et al., 2016), which was designed specifically for children aged 2-12 years and has good inter- and intra-observer reliability and good validity (Kain et al., 1997; MacLaren et al., 2009; Sadhasivam et al., 2010). The measurement will be the percentage of patients with anxiety and the mean score for anxiety by intervention group. The measurement will be taken before and after the procedure, immediately following its completion.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment, 1 DAY

Secondary outcomes

  1. level of satisfaction

    The measurement will be the mean score for satisfaction by control or intervention group with a liker scale 1-10.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment, 1 DAY

  2. level of pain

    EVA-VAS scale: a 0-10 Likert scale. The measurement will be the percentage of patients with pain (yes/no) and the mean score for pain by control and intervention group. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a tool used in clinical settings to measure the intensity of pain or other subjective sensations. It consists of a straight line (usually 10 cm or 100 mm) where one end represents the absence of pain and the other end represents the worst pain imaginable. Values and Meaning of the VAS The measurement is made in centimeters or millimeters, and the values are interpreted as follows: 0: No pain / Absence of pain.0.5-4: Mild pain.4.1-7 cm: Moderate pain. \>7: Severe pain / Very intense.10: The worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment, 1 DAY

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitario de Navarra
    Pamplona, Navarre 31007, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jung MJ, Libaw JS, Ma K, Whitlock EL, Feiner JR, Sinskey JL. Pediatric Distraction on Induction of Anesthesia With Virtual Reality and Perioperative Anxiolysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):798-806. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005004. PubMed 32618627 ↗
  • Schmitt YS, Hoffman HG, Blough DK, Patterson DR, Jensen MP, Soltani M, Carrougher GJ, Nakamura D, Sharar SR. A randomized, controlled trial of immersive virtual reality analgesia, during physical therapy for pediatric burns. Burns. 2011 Feb;37(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 7. PubMed 20692769 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 8, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 8, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07866417
Lead sponsor
Fundacion Miguel Servet
Collaborators
Hospital universitario navarra
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 8, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2026
Completion
Mar 27, 2026
Last update
Oct 8, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion