CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07844109Updated Sep 28, 2026

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Testing and Handheld Near Infrared Spectroscopy Technology CEREBO in India.

An interventional study of GFAP/D-Dimer Point-of-Care Testing & CEREBO Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) and CT Head in Stroke, sponsored by Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-28.

Sponsored by Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
232
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

CEREBO is an ICMR award winning point-of-care (POC) adjunct CT scanning device for detecting brain hematomas in patients with head injury. The study aims to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the PREDICT Assessment Model (CEREBO-NIRS plus GFAP/D-Dimer POC Assay) in patients with suspected stroke. The study will be conducted as part of the Indian Council of Medical Research's National Health Research Priority (ICMR-NHRP) under the INDIA-EMS project using a two phase design.

PHASE I: Validation of a diagnostic accuracy and feasbility of PREDICT assessment model (a combined approach using GFAP/ D-dimer POC lateral flow assay plus CEREBO-NIRS technology).

Study Design: Prospective, Multicenter, Validation and Feasibility Study.

PHASE II: Pilot RCT to assess integration of the PREDICT assessment model into pre-hospital pathways.

Study Design: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) (Year 3-5)

Read the detailed description

This study, titled "Prehospital Rapid Evaluation and Detection in Cerebrovascular Triage: A Multicenter Study of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Point-of-Care Testing and Handheld Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Technology (CEREBO) in India," aims to validate the PREDICT Assessment Model, which combines GFAP/D-Dimer point-of-care testing with handheld CEREBO Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) technology for the rapid differentiation of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage in the prehospital setting.

The study will be conducted under the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) National Health Research Priority (NHRP) programme as part of the INDIA-EMS project and will use a two-phase design. Phase I is a prospective, multicenter validation and feasibility study involving patients with suspected acute stroke presenting by ambulance or directly to the emergency department. Participants will undergo clinical assessment, including BE-FAST and neurological assessment, finger-prick blood testing for GFAP/D-Dimer, and CEREBO-NIRS assessment. All participants will subsequently undergo standard diagnostic evaluation with a CT head scan, which will serve as the gold standard for stroke subtype classification. The diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, process times, and safety of the combined PREDICT Assessment Model will be evaluated.

Phase II will be a pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating the integration of the PREDICT Assessment Model into prehospital stroke pathways. Ambulance services within the catchment areas of CMC Ludhiana and JIPMER Puducherry will be randomized to intervention or control groups. In the intervention group, ambulance personnel will use GFAP/D-Dimer testing and CEREBO-NIRS technology to support prehospital stroke classification and triage, in coordination with the on-call stroke team. The control group will receive standard care, including transport to the hospital for CT-based diagnosis and subsequent treatment decisions.

The primary objective of the study is to validate the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of the combined GFAP/D-Dimer and CEREBO-NIRS approach and to assess its potential impact on prehospital stroke triage. Phase II will additionally assess the effect of the intervention on the time from ambulance dispatch to initiation of stroke-specific treatment. Secondary outcomes include functional outcome at 90 days measured by the modified Rankin Scale, in-hospital mortality, and adverse events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Keywords

  • Acute stroke
  • Ischemic stroke
  • Intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Prehospital stroke triage
  • GFAP
  • D-Dimer
  • CEREBO
  • Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
  • PREDICT Assessment Model
  • Point-of-Care Testing
  • Stroke classification
  • Stroke diagnosis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Phase 1

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients of any gender ≥18 years with clinically suspected stroke
  • Transported by ambulance or presenting directly to ED of participating hospitals
  • Time from symptom onset/ Lost known well time (within 24 hours)
  • Consent provided by patient/ next of kin

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with known pre-existing neurological conditions that may confound diagnosis (Concurrent traumatic brain injury, recent TBI in last 3months, IS/ICH in last 3 months, Diagnosis of brain tumour/SOL)
  • Patients with known medical condition with estimated life expectancy ≤ 3 months
  • Those refusing consent

Phase 2

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adult patients of any gender ≥18 years with clinically suspected stroke
  • Transported by ambulance to ED of participating hospitals
  • Time from symptom onset/ Last well known time (≤ 24 hours)
  • NIHSS ≥ 5
  • Consent provided by patient/ next of kin

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with known pre-existing neurological conditions that may confound diagnosis (Concurrent traumatic brain injury, recent TBI in last 3months, IS/ ICH in last 3 months, Diagnosis of brain tumour/ SOL)
  • Patients with known medical condition with estimated life expectancy ≤ 3 months
  • Those refusing consent
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
232 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PREDICT Assessment Model

    Ambulances in the intervention group will use the GFAP/D-Dimer point-of-care test and CEREBO Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) technology to classify suspected acute stroke in the prehospital setting. Patients suspected of ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion will be rapidly triaged to a comprehensive stroke centre, while patients suspected of intracerebral hemorrhage will receive stringent blood pressure control in the ambulance according to established protocols. Decision-making will be undertaken in conjunction with the on-call stroke team through the PREDICT App.

    Diagnostic Test: GFAP/D-Dimer Point-of-Care Testing & CEREBO Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)

  • Active comparator
    Standard Care

    Ambulances in the control group will follow standard care procedures, including rapid transport of patients to the hospital for CT head imaging, followed by treatment decisions based on the CT findings.

    Diagnostic Test: CT Head

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testGFAP/D-Dimer Point-of-Care Testing & CEREBO Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)

    A finger-prick blood sample will be obtained from patients with suspected acute stroke and tested using a GFAP/D-Dimer lateral flow assay. The test will provide rapid biomarker results to support differentiation between ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage in the prehospital setting and The handheld CEREBO-NIRS device will be applied non-invasively to the patient's scalp to detect intracranial hematoma by assessing asymmetry in near-infrared optical density. The findings will be recorded and used as part of the PREDICT Assessment Model for stroke subtype classification.

  • Diagnostic testCT Head

    Standard care CT head imaging

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PREDICT assessment model

    (Phase 1) Sensitivity and Specificity and PREDICT assessment model. Accurate identification of ICH \>90% using PREDICT model.

    Time frame: 30 mins

  2. Time for Device Application by Paramedics

    (Phase 1) The time taken by paramedics/ ED personnel to apply the CEREBO NIRS device and obtain GFAP/D Dimer results. Lesser time indicates good outcome.

    Time frame: 30 mins

  3. Treatment initiation

    (Phase 2) Time from Ambulance dispatch to initiation of stroke-specific treatment (Triage to Stroke ready centre or rapid BP control). Lesser time indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: 30 mins

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inter-Center Variability

    (Phase 1) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and feasibility metrics between CMC Ludhiana and JIPMER Puducherry to assess consistency across centres. More consistency indicates good outcome.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Correlation with Gold Standard

    (Phase 1) Agreement between the PREDICT assessment model and the CT head scan diagnosis (the gold standard). More correlation indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Safety Metrics

    Phase 1 Documentation of adverse events related to the testing procedure. Fewer events indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. modified Rankin Scale

    Phase 2 Functional outcome at 90 days Lower score (0-3) indicates good outcome

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. In-hospital mortality

    Phase 2 In-hospital mortality. Lesser mortality indicates better outcome

    Time frame: 7 days

  6. Adverse events

    Phase 2 Incidence of adverse events (e.g., symptomatic ICH). Lesser events indicate better outcome.

    Time frame: 90 days

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Puducherry JIPMER
    Puducherry, Puducherry 605006, India
  • Christian Medical College and Hospital
    Ludhiana, Punjab 141008, India
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Berkowitz AL. Managing acute stroke in low-resource settings. Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Jul 1;94(7):554-6. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.162610. Epub 2016 Jun 2. No abstract available. PubMed 27429496 ↗
  • Abraham SV, Joy A, Sahu AK, Ravindra P, Dhar S, Teja R, Krishnan SV, Liu R, Rudd AG, Ford GA. Barriers to Effective Prehospital and Hyperacute Stroke Care in India: A Physician Perspective. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2024 Jul-Sep;17(3):129-135. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_156_23. Epub 2024 Aug 30. PubMed 39552827 ↗
  • Ma L, Hu X, Song L, Chen X, Ouyang M, Billot L, Li Q, Malavera A, Li X, Munoz-Venturelli P, de Silva A, Thang NH, Wahab KW, Pandian JD, Wasay M, Pontes-Neto OM, Abanto C, Arauz A, Shi H, Tang G, Zhu S, She X, Liu L, Sakamoto Y, You S, Han Q, Crutzen B, Cheung E, Li Y, Wang X, Chen C, Liu F, Zhao Y, Li H, Liu Y, Jiang Y, Chen L, Wu B, Liu M, Xu J, You C, Anderson CS; INTERACT3 Investigators. The third Intensive Care Bundle with Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage Trial (INTERACT3): an international, stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023 Jul 1;402(10395):27-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00806-1. Epub 2023 May 25. PubMed 37245517 ↗
  • Palaniswami M, Yan B. Mechanical Thrombectomy Is Now the Gold Standard for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Implications for Routine Clinical Practice. Interv Neurol. 2015 Oct;4(1-2):18-29. doi: 10.1159/000438774. Epub 2015 Sep 18. PubMed 26600793 ↗
  • Ren C, Kobeissy F, Alawieh A, Li N, Li N, Zibara K, Zoltewicz S, Guingab-Cagmat J, Larner SF, Ding Y, Hayes RL, Ji X, Mondello S. Assessment of Serum UCH-L1 and GFAP in Acute Stroke Patients. Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 14;6:24588. doi: 10.1038/srep24588. PubMed 27074724 ↗
  • Ramos-Pachon A, Lopez-Cancio E, Bustamante A, Perez de la Ossa N, Millan M, Hernandez-Perez M, Garcia-Berrocoso T, Cardona P, Rubiera M, Serena J, Ustrell X, Garces M, Terceno M, Davalos A, Montaner J. D-Dimer as Predictor of Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):852-858. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031657. Epub 2021 Feb 10. PubMed 33563016 ↗
  • Kalra LP, Khatter H, Ramanathan S, Sapehia S, Devi K, Kaliyaperumal A, Bal D, Sebastian I, Kakarla R, Singhania A, Rathore S, Klinsing S, Pandian JD, Foerch C. Serum GFAP for stroke diagnosis in regions with limited access to brain imaging (BE FAST India). Eur Stroke J. 2021 Jun;6(2):176-184. doi: 10.1177/23969873211010069. Epub 2021 May 11. PubMed 34414293 ↗
  • Gaude E, Murphy D, Gerstl JVE, Kappel AD, Dmytriw AA, Nawabi NLA, Izzy S, Guardia REA, Vicenty-Padilla JC, Gropen T, Patel NJ, Liebeskind DS, Siddiqui AH, See AP, Aziz-Sultan MA, Bernstock JD. Detection of GFAP and D-Dimer in a Point-of-Care Test for Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2025 Jan 11;5(2):e001559. doi: 10.1161/SVIN.124.001559. eCollection 2025 Mar. PubMed 41573178 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study protocol does not currently specify a plan for sharing individual participant data (IPD) with other researchers. Any future IPD sharing will be considered in accordance with applicable ethical, regulatory, and data-protection requirements.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07844109
Lead sponsor
Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India
Collaborators
Indian Council of Medical Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 28, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 30, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2026

Study contacts

Dr Ivy A Sebastian
Contact
ivy29cmc@gmail.com
09592588138
Dr Jeyaraj D Pandian, MD DM
Contact
jeyarajpandian@hotmail.com
9915784750
Dr Jeyaraj D Pandian, MD DM
principal investigator · Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India
Dr Ivy A Sebastian
principal investigator · Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion