CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07843875iTBS-MDDUpdated Sep 28, 2026

Personalized Accelerated iTBS Versus Sham for Major Depressive Disorder

An interventional study of Personalized Functional-Connectivity-Targeted Accelerated iTBS and Sham Accelerated iTBS in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), sponsored by Capital Medical University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-28.

Sponsored by Capital Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of individualized functional connectivity-guided accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). A total of 90 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either active iTBS or matched sham stimulation. Treatment will be administered over 5 consecutive days, with 10 stimulation sessions per day.

For each participant, an individualized stimulation target within the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex will be identified using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary objective is to compare the change in depressive symptoms, measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), from pre-treatment baseline (Day -1) to 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34) between the active and sham groups. Changes in other clinical symptoms, treatment response, remission, and safety will also be assessed during follow-up through 8 weeks after treatment.

Multimodal MRI, resting-state electroencephalography (EEG), and transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with EEG (TMS-EEG) will be collected at prespecified time points. These measures will be used to explore treatment-related changes in brain function and connectivity and to identify potential neuroimaging and neurophysiological biomarkers associated with clinical improvement and the maintenance of treatment effects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Keywords

  • accelerated iTBS
  • functional connectivity targeting
  • DLPFC
  • personalized neuromodulation
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 22 to 65 years, regardless of sex. Right-handed.
  • Meets the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for major depressive disorder, confirmed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), version 7.0.The current major depressive episode has lasted for at least 4 weeks.
  • Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of 20 or greater at both screening and baseline.
  • Stable depressive symptoms, defined as a difference in MADRS total score between screening and baseline of no more than 20%.
  • Currently medication-free or receiving a stable dose of psychiatric medication for at least 4 weeks before enrollment, with agreement to maintain the same medication regimen through the Week 4 follow-up.
  • Able to provide a complete and verifiable history of previous antidepressant treatments.
  • Eligible to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • Able to complete all protocol-specified resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) assessments.
  • Able to understand and comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder, a psychotic disorder, primary obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, or another psychiatric disorder considered incompatible with study participation.
  • A response of "yes" to Item 4 or Item 5 of the suicidal ideation section of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) during the current depressive episode; suicidal behavior within the 6 months before screening; or current high suicide risk as determined by the investigator.
  • A change of more than 20% in MADRS total score between screening and baseline.
  • A skull defect or fracture, treatment-resistant epilepsy, brain tumor, stroke, or another serious medical or neurological condition that may affect study participation or safety.
  • A cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant, MRI-incompatible metallic foreign body, implanted electronic device, claustrophobia, or another contraindication to MRI or transcranial magnetic stimulation.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Participation in another drug or medical-device clinical trial within 1 month before screening.
  • Receipt of electroconvulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, light therapy, or another systematic neuromodulation treatment within 1 month before screening.
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the individual unsuitable for participation in the study.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active: Accelerated iTBS

    Participants in this arm will receive personalized functional-connectivity-targeted accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The treatment consists of 10 sessions per day for 5 consecutive days, with 1,800 pulses per session, 90,000 pulses total, 90% resting motor threshold with depth adjustment, and a 50-minute inter-session interval.

    Device: Personalized Functional-Connectivity-Targeted Accelerated iTBS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham: Accelerated iTBS

    Participants in this arm will receive sham accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation using the same imaging-based targeting workflow and the same 10 sessions per day for 5 consecutive days schedule. The sham system is designed to match coil positioning, sound, and scalp sensation, while delivering no effective cortical magnetic field.

    Device: Sham Accelerated iTBS

Interventions

  • DevicePersonalized Functional-Connectivity-Targeted Accelerated iTBS

    Personalized functional-connectivity-targeted accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The stimulation target is individualized using resting-state functional MRI. The active treatment consists of 10 sessions per day for 5 consecutive days, with 1,800 pulses per session, 90,000 total pulses, 90% resting motor threshold with depth adjustment, and a 50-minute inter-session interval.

  • DeviceSham Accelerated iTBS

    Sham accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation delivered using the same imaging-based targeting workflow and the same 10 sessions per day for 5 consecutive days schedule as the active intervention. The sham system is designed to match coil positioning, acoustic click, and scalp sensation, while delivering no effective cortical magnetic field.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From pre-treatment baseline (Day -1) to 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34, corresponding to 28 days after the first post-treatment assessment visit)

    Change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline (Day -1) to 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34, corresponding to 28 days after the first post-treatment assessment visit). The MADRS assesses the severity of depressive symptoms, with higher scores indicating greater severity. A greater reduction indicates greater improvement in depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1) to 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Response Rate

    Proportion of participants with a clinical response, defined as a 50% or greater reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from pre-treatment baseline

    Time frame: Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), 6 weeks post-treatment (Week 6; Day 48), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  2. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Remission Rate

    Proportion of participants achieving remission, defined as a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of 10 or lower.

    Time frame: 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), 6 weeks post-treatment (Week 6; Day 48), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  3. Change From Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1) in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Follow-up Visits

    Change in MADRS total score from Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1) to each specified follow-up visit. The MADRS total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. A greater reduction from baseline indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 6 weeks post-treatment (Week 6; Day 48), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  4. Change in the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (IDS-SR30) Total Score

    Change in self-reported depressive symptom severity assessed using the IDS-SR30. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. A greater reduction from pre-treatment baseline (Day -1) indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: Screening (Day -8), pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), 6 weeks post-treatment (Week 6; Day 48), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  5. Change in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) Total Score

    Change in clinician-rated depressive symptom severity assessed using the HAM-D-17. The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity. A greater reduction from pre-treatment baseline (Day -1) indicates greater improvement.

    Time frame: Screening (Day -8), pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), 6 weeks post-treatment (Week 6; Day 48), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  6. Change in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Total Score

    Change in SHAPS total score from baseline to each follow-up visit. The SHAPS is a 14-item self-reported measure of hedonic capacity and anhedonia. Higher scores indicate greater anhedonia, and a reduction from Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1) indicates improvement

    Time frame: Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), 6 weeks post-treatment (Week 6; Day 48), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  7. Change in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score

    The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) will be used to assess overall changes in participants' clinical condition and treatment response throughout the study.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), 6 weeks post-treatment (Week 6; Day 48), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  8. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score

    Change in PSQI total score from baseline to each follow-up visit. The PSQI assesses subjective sleep quality and sleep disturbance. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. A reduction from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  9. Change in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Scores

    Change in the MCCB overall composite score and prespecified cognitive-domain scores from baseline. The MCCB assesses processing speed, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    Relevant information will be collected through active inquiry, participant self-reports, clinical observation, and necessary medical examinations.

    Time frame: From the first stimulation session on Treatment Day 1 through 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  2. Emergence or Worsening of Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior Assessed Using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale

    Occurrence or worsening of suicidal ideation or suicidal behavior assessed using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Outcomes include newly emergent or increased suicidal ideation, suicidal intent, suicidal planning, suicidal behavior, or an increased level of suicide risk compared with baseline.

    Time frame: Screening (Day -8), pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), 6 weeks post-treatment (Week 6; Day 48), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  3. Emergence or Worsening of Manic Symptoms Assessed by the Young Mania Rating Scale

    The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) will be used as a safety measure to monitor the emergence or worsening of manic symptoms during and after treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater severity of manic symptoms.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), 6 weeks post-treatment (Week 6; Day 48), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  4. Change in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Evoked Potentials

    Change in the amplitude and latency of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked electroencephalographic potential components, including the N45 and N100 components, following stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These measures assess cortical excitation-inhibition balance and neuroplasticity.

    Time frame: Screening (Day -8), pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), after completion of the tenth stimulation session on treatment Day 3 (Day 3), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), and 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34).

  5. Change in MRI-Derived Neuroimaging Measures

    Changes in prespecified resting-state functional MRI-derived functional connectivity measures from baseline to each post-treatment assessment. These measures will include functional connectivity between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex target and the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), functional connectivity within the default mode network (DMN), functional connectivity between the sgACC and the DMN,and functional connectivity between the DLPFC and the DMN.

    Time frame: Screening (Day -8), pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34), and 8 weeks post-treatment (Week 8; Day 62).

  6. Change in Resting-State Electroencephalography Measures

    Changes in prespecified measures derived from resting-state electroencephalography (EEG). These measures will include frontal alpha asymmetry, alpha-band current source density, the aperiodic 1/f slope, and EEG spectral characteristics. These exploratory measures will be used to evaluate treatment-related changes in electrophysiological activity and their associations with clinical outcomes.

    Time frame: Screening (Day -8), pre-treatment baseline (Day -1), after completion of the tenth stimulation session on treatment Day 3 (Day 3), 1 day post-treatment (Day 6), 1 week post-treatment (Week 1; Day 13), and 4 weeks post-treatment (Week 4; Day 34).

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmoller J, Carpenter LL, Cincotta M, Chen R, Daskalakis JD, Di Lazzaro V, Fox MD, George MS, Gilbert D, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lefaucheur JP, Leocani L, Lisanby SH, Miniussi C, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Peterchev AV, Quartarone A, Rotenberg A, Rothwell J, Rossini PM, Santarnecchi E, Shafi MM, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wassermann EM, Zangen A, Ziemann U, Hallett M; basis of this article began with a Consensus Statement from the IFCN Workshop on "Present, Future of TMS: Safety, Ethical Guidelines", Siena, October 17-20, 2018, updating through April 2020. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jan;132(1):269-306. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 24. PubMed 33243615 ↗
  • Fox MD, Buckner RL, White MP, Greicius MD, Pascual-Leone A. Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Oct 1;72(7):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.028. Epub 2012 Jun 1. PubMed 22658708 ↗
  • Cash RFH, Cocchi L, Lv J, Wu Y, Fitzgerald PB, Zalesky A. Personalized connectivity-guided DLPFC-TMS for depression: Advancing computational feasibility, precision and reproducibility. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Sep;42(13):4155-4172. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25330. Epub 2021 Feb 5. PubMed 33544411 ↗
  • Taylor JJ, Kare MR, Haj-Darwish D, Jones E, Sanderson L, Khosravani S, Leach J, Bomer L, Hall N, Chiulli N, Steuber E, Lin C, Drew W, Palm ST, Chandra A, Frandsen SB, Bekou A, Barbour T, Baratono SR, Gonsalvez I, Lyndon S, Schaper FLWVJ, Wang W, Silbersweig D, Siddiqi SH, Fox MD. Connectivity- vs Scalp-Based Targeting of Accelerated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2026 Aug 1;83(8):807-817. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.1100. PubMed 42340706 ↗
  • Cole EJ, Phillips AL, Bentzley BS, Stimpson KH, Nejad R, Barmak F, Veerapal C, Khan N, Cherian K, Felber E, Brown R, Choi E, King S, Pankow H, Bishop JH, Azeez A, Coetzee J, Rapier R, Odenwald N, Carreon D, Hawkins J, Chang M, Keller J, Raj K, DeBattista C, Jo B, Espil FM, Schatzberg AF, Sudheimer KD, Williams NR. Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;179(2):132-141. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429. Epub 2021 Oct 29. PubMed 34711062 ↗
  • Cole EJ, Stimpson KH, Bentzley BS, Gulser M, Cherian K, Tischler C, Nejad R, Pankow H, Choi E, Aaron H, Espil FM, Pannu J, Xiao X, Duvio D, Solvason HB, Hawkins J, Guerra A, Jo B, Raj KS, Phillips AL, Barmak F, Bishop JH, Coetzee JP, DeBattista C, Keller J, Schatzberg AF, Sudheimer KD, Williams NR. Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 1;177(8):716-726. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070720. Epub 2020 Apr 7. PubMed 32252538 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07843875
Lead sponsor
Capital Medical University
Responsible party
Gang Wang (Prof., Capital Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 28, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2026

Study contacts

Adam Williamson, PhD
Contact
full.field.hammer@gmail.com
8615026544105

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion