CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07843836Updated Sep 28, 2026

EndovascularTherapy Versus Standard Medical Terapy for Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion in 24 Hours to 30 Days

An observational study in Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion and Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Xuan Sun. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-28.

Sponsored by Xuan Sun · Observational

Updated Sep 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study using a real-world study design. The aim of this study is to compare functional and safety outcomes of intravascular recanalization therapy (with COSIS distal stent protection technology strategy as the core) combined with standard drug therapy in improving functional outcomes in patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion in the ultra late window (24 hours-30 days) compared with standard drug therapy alone.

Read the detailed description

Patients with ischemic stroke whose onset or last known well (LKW) ranged from 24 hours to 30 days, who were confirmed by imaging to have intracranial large vessel occlusion and may still have brain tissue that can be saved were included. The study did not interfere with the choice of treatment options. Patients received intravascular therapy or standard drug treatment, which was determined by clinicians according to the condition, imaging characteristics and the joint decision of doctors and patients. According to the actual treatment of patients, the intravascular treatment cohort and the standard drug treatment cohort were formed, in which the intravascular treatment was centered on the COSIS distal stent protection strategy. The primary outcome is proportion of patients with functional independence defined as mRS score of 0-2 at 90 days after enrollment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion
  • Ischemic Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • COSIS Distal Stent Protection Technique
  • Endovascular Therapy
  • Standard Medication
  • Ultra Late Window
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,593 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 930 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is below the median of 300 across 777 observational studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Xuan Sun as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All research centers continuously screened eligible patients according to unified standards. The study did not interfere with the choice of treatment options. Whether the patients received intravascular therapy was determined by clinicians according to the condition, imaging characteristics, treatment risk and the joint decision of doctors and patients.

This is a prospective multicenter observational registry-based cohort study. Endovascular treatment is a routine clinical interventional procedure. The decision whether to perform endovascular treatment is made by treating clinicians, not assigned by study investigators. Investigators only collect real-world clinical data and follow-up outcomes of enrolled participants.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age≥18 years
  2. The clinical diagnosis was ischemic stroke, and imaging confirmed the presence of intracranial large vessel occlusion
  3. The time from LKW or the time of finding symptoms is 24 hours to 72 hours; or more than 72 hours but not more than 30 days, and there are neurological deterioration or fluctuation
  4. Imaging findings suggest that there may still be salvageable brain tissue, which meets any of the following conditions: perfusion imaging examination shows that the ischemic core volume \< 70 ml and the mismatch ratio > 1.2; CTA or DSA showed moderate or good collateral circulation; MRI-DWI showed a significant mismatch between lesion size and clinical symptoms
  5. The modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) before onset was 0-1
  6. The subjects themselves or their legal representatives voluntarily participated in the study and signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Large area cerebral infarction or imaging showed obvious space occupying effect, such as ASPECTS\<6 points,or brainstem infarction area exceeded 1/3 of the corresponding anatomical area
  2. Isolated extracranial carotid or vertebral artery occlusion
  3. Intracranial tumors, arteriovenous malformations or other serious intracranial diseases that may significantly affect the evaluation of the outcome of the study
  4. Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in the past 3 months
  5. There is a risk of severe coagulation dysfunction, active bleeding or other high bleeding that cannot be corrected
  6. Severe liver and kidney function damage, which may affect treatment or follow-up
  7. Pregnant or lactating women
  8. The estimated survival time is less than 1 year
  9. Unable to complete 90-day clinical follow-up or main outcome assessment
  10. Participating in other interventional clinical trials that may affect the treatment or outcome evaluation of this study
  11. Other circumstances that the researcher believes are not suitable for participating in this study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Endovascular Treatment Cohort

    Intravascular therapy combined with standard drug therapy, in which the core of intravascular therapy is the cosis distal stent protection strategy.

    Procedure: Endovascular Treatment Group

  • Standard Medical Therapy Cohort

    Standard drug therapy alone.It mainly includes antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, blood pressure and blood glucose management, etc.

    Other: Standard medication

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndovascular Treatment Group

    The recanalization strategy with COSIS distal stent protection technology as the core was used in endovascular treatment.In addition to thrombus removal, the device mainly uses its distal closed basket structure and stent guide wire to form protection and anchor fulcrum at the distal end of occlusion, so as to assist in balloon dilatation, thrombus removal or stent implantation of complex occlusive lesions, and reduce thrombus escape.

  • OtherStandard medication

    Standard drug therapy is implemented in accordance with the current guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cerebrovascular diseases and the routine of each center, mainly including antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, blood pressure and blood glucose management, etc. The drug name, dose, route of administration, frequency of administration and course of treatment are determined by the clinician according to the patient's condition. The study only recorded the actual drug treatment and important adjustments.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of patients with functional independence defined as mRS score of 0 - 2 at 90 days after enrollment

    The modified Rankin scale (mRS) ranged from 0 to 6, with a score of 0 indicating no disability, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability but remaining able to walk unassisted, 4 moderately severe disability,5 severe disability, and 6 death.

    Time frame: 90 days after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. The overall distribution of mRS at 90 days after enrollment

    The modified Rankin scale (mRS) ranged from 0 to 6, with a score of 0 indicating no disability, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability but remaining able to walk unassisted, 4 moderately severe disability,5 severe disability, and 6 death.

    Time frame: 90 days after enrollment

  2. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 24 hours after treatment

    The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ranged from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurologic deficits.

    Time frame: 24 hours after treatment

  3. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at discharge

    The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ranged from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurologic deficits.

    Time frame: At discharge

  4. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 30 days after enrollment

    The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ranged from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurologic deficits.

    Time frame: 30 days after enrollment

  5. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 90 days after enrollment

    The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ranged from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurologic deficits.

    Time frame: 90 days after enrollment

  6. The recurrence rate of stroke within 90 days after enrollment

    The recurrence rate of stroke within 90 days after enrollment.

    Time frame: 90 days after enrollment

  7. Transient ischemic attack within 90 days after enrollment

    Transient ischemic attack within 90 days after enrollment.

    Time frame: 90 days after enrollment

  8. All-cause mortality within 90 days after enrollment

    All-cause mortality within 90 days after enrollment.

    Time frame: 90 days after enrollment

  9. Revascularization of target vessels within 90 days after enrollment

    Revascularization of target vessels within 90 days after enrollment.

    Time frame: 90 days after enrollment

  10. The technical success rate of the intravascular treatment cohort,successful recanalization of the target vessel with residual stenosis <50% and final mTICI grade≥2b

    The technical success rate of the intravascular treatment cohort,successful recanalization of the target vessel with residual stenosis \<50% and final mTICI grade≥2b.

    Time frame: At the end of the procedure

  11. Degree of recanalization in the intravascular treatment cohort

    Degree of recanalization in the intravascular treatment cohort.The mTICI scale evaluates angiographic recanalization after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Grades range from 0 (no perfusion) to 3 (complete recanalization). mTICI grade≥2b is defined as successful recanalization.

    Time frame: At the end of the procedure

  12. Operation time of intravascular treatment cohort

    Operation time of intravascular treatment cohort.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  13. Distribution of mRS scores at 6 months after enrollment

    The modified Rankin scale (mRS) ranged from 0 to 6, with a score of 0 indicating no disability, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability but remaining able to walk unassisted, 4 moderately severe disability,5 severe disability, and 6 death.

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment

  14. The recurrence rate of stroke at 6 months after enrollment

    The recurrence rate of stroke at 6 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment

  15. Transient ischemic attack at 6 months after enrollment

    Transient ischemic attack at 6 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment

  16. All-cause mortality at 6 months after enrollment

    All-cause mortality at 6 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment

  17. Revascularization of target vessels at 6 months after enrollment

    Revascularization of target vessels at 6 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 6 months after enrollment

  18. Distribution of mRS scores at 12 months after enrollment

    The modified Rankin scale (mRS) ranged from 0 to 6, with a score of 0 indicating no disability, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability but remaining able to walk unassisted, 4 moderately severe disability,5 severe disability, and 6 death.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  19. The recurrence rate of stroke at 12 months after enrollment

    The recurrence rate of stroke at 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  20. Transient ischemic attack at 12 months after enrollment

    Transient ischemic attack at 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  21. All-cause mortality at 12 months after enrollment

    All-cause mortality at 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  22. Revascularization of target vessels at 12 months after enrollment

    Revascularization of target vessels at 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse events within 12 months after enrollment

    Adverse events events within 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  2. Serious adverse events within 12 months after enrollment

    Serious adverse events within 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  3. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 12 months after enrollment

    Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  4. Ischemic stroke within 12 months after enrollment

    Ischemic stroke within 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  5. Hemorrhagic stroke within 12 months after enrollment

    Hemorrhagic stroke within 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  6. All-cause death and other important clinical safety events within 12 months after enrollment

    All-cause death and other important clinical safety events within 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

  7. Proportion of at least one complication in the intravascular therapy cohort

    The intravascular treatment cohort included perioperative vascular dissection, vascular perforation or rupture, distal embolization, acute occlusion, re-occlusion, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome and puncture site complications.

    Time frame: Perioperative

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Beijing Tiantan Hospitall, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100070, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Sep 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07843836
Lead sponsor
Xuan Sun
Responsible party
Xuan Sun (Vice-Director of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 28, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2026

Study contacts

Xuan Sun, MD
Contact
sxuan@yeah.net
13810926284
Xuan Sun, MD
principal investigator · Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion