ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07836816Updated Sep 24, 2026

Comparison of Maxillary Canine Retraction Rate With and Without Power Arm

An interventional study of Split-mouth randomized clinical trial in Orthodontic Anchorage, Power Arm Sliding and Direct Sliding, sponsored by Tanzila Rafique. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Bangladesh. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Tanzila Rafique · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this split-mouth randomized clinical trial is to compare maxillary canine retraction with and without power arm during fixed orthodontic treatment.The main question it aims to answer is What are the differences in the rate of maxillary canine retraction between the power- arm technique and the direct sliding technique over a 6-month period time?

Read the detailed description

Researchers will compare a power arm placed in the vertical slot of the canine bracket with elastomeric chain to a mini-screw (experimental/PAS) against a conventional elastomeric chain from the canine bracket directly to a mini-screw (control/DS) during canine retraction phase.

Participants will:

  • undergo bilateral maxillary first premolar extractions, followed by placement of a titanium mini-screw or TAD (Vector TAS, 1.4×8.0 mm) between second premolar and first molar on each side for anchorage.
  • receive fixed orthodontic treatment using a pre-adjusted edgewise appliance system (Roth, 0.018-inch slot).
  • have levelling and alignment carried out using a graduated arch-wire sequence (0.014-inch, 0.016-inch, 0.016×0.016-inch, 0.016×0.022-inch, and 0.017×0.025-inch), with angulation corrections addressed at this stage.
  • have bilateral canine retraction initiated three months post-extraction on a 0.016×0.022-inch stainless steel arch-wire, with an elastomeric chain attaching from the power arm to the mini-screw on the experimental (PAS) side and directly from the canine bracket to the mini-screw on the control (DS) side, under a standardized force of 150g reactivated every 21 days.
  • be evaluated via CBCT at baseline (T0) and at 3 and 6 months (T1, T2) to measure canine retraction rate and angulation change on both sides
02

Conditions studied

  • Orthodontic Anchorage
  • Power Arm Sliding
  • Direct Sliding
  • Orthodontic Space Closure
  • Cuspid
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
  • Split-mouth Trial

Keywords

  • Canine retraction,
  • Power arm sliding
  • Sliding mechanics
  • Direct sliding
  • Mini-screw anchorage
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tanzila Rafique is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant with Angle's class I and class II malocclusion who required both maxillary bilateral premolar extraction for orthodontic treatment.
  • Participants who required maximum anchorage.
  • Participants with good general health condition and oral hygiene status.
  • Age range of the participants will be 18 to 25 years.
  • Sex of the participants will be both male and female.
  • Participants with full permanent dentition present (excluding 3 rd molar).
  • Participants who have completed the levelling and alignment phase before the start of canine retraction.
  • Participants with no caries, fracture, periapical lesion, root resorption, morphological variation or other pathology involving the maxillary canine.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with systemic conditions affecting bone metabolism or orthodontic tooth movement (e.g., diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis).
  • Participants with impacted or displaced maxillary canines.
  • Participants with retained deciduous canines.
  • Participants with dental anomalies affecting canine retraction.
  • Participants with previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Participants with cleft lip/palate, craniofacial syndromes, or facial asymmetry.
  • Participants requiring surgical orthodontic treatment.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Participants with poor cooperation, missed appointments, or frequent appliance breakage.
  • Habit of smoking.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Power Arm sliding technique

    Experimental: Power Arm sliding techniqueA power arm placed in the vertical slot of the canine bracket and elastomeric chain attached from power arm to mini-screw.

    Procedure: Split-mouth randomized clinical trial

  • Active comparator
    Control: direct sliding technique

    Active Comparator / Control: direct sliding technique: Elastomeric chain applied directly from the canine bracket to a mini-screw on the contralateral side.

    Procedure: Split-mouth randomized clinical trial

Interventions

  • ProcedureSplit-mouth randomized clinical trial

    Experimental: Power Arm sliding technique: A power arm placed in the vertical slot of the canine bracket and elastomeric chain attached from power arm to mini-screw. Active Comparator / Control: direct sliding technique: Elastomeric chain applied directly from the canine bracket to a mini-screw on the contralateral side.

    Also known as: Experimental: Power Arm sliding technique, Active Comparator / Control: direct sliding technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary outcome measure

    This split-mouth randomized clinical trial will compare maxillary canine retraction (in mm) with and without a power arm during fixed orthodontic treatment.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcome measures

    * Participants will receive fixed orthodontic treatment using a pre-adjusted edgewise appliance system (Roth, 0.018-inch slot). * Bilateral maxillary first premolar extractions will be done followed by placement of a titanium mini-screw or TAD (Vector TAS, 1.4×8.0 mm) between the second premolar and first molar on each side. * Levelling and alignment will be carriedout using a graduated arch-wire sequence (0.014-inch, 0.016-inch, 0.016×0.016-inch, 0.016×0.022-inch, and 0.017×0.025-inch). * Bilateral canine retraction will be initiated three months post-extraction on a 0.016×0.022-inch stainless steel arch-wire, with an elastomeric chain attaching from the power arm to the mini-screw on the experimental (PAS) side and directly from the canine bracket to the mini-screw on the control (DS) side, under a force of 150g reactivated every 21 days. * Evaluation will be done at 3 and 6 months to measure canine retraction rate (in mm) and angulation changes(in degrees) at both side.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07836816
Lead sponsor
Tanzila Rafique
Responsible party
Tanzila Rafique (Associate Professor, Bangladesh Medical University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
Start date
Aug 18, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 17, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 17, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Mahmood Sajedeen, BDS,FCPS
study director · Bangladesh Medical University (BMU)
Sajedeen
study director · Bangladesh Medical University (BMU), Dhaka-1000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion