CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07830212Updated Sep 23, 2026

Diagnostic Performance of ACP3-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients With Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Single-Center Study

A Phase 2 interventional study of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 in Prostatic Neoplasms and Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Yong He. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Yong He · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging, which targets prostate acid phosphatase (ACP3), in men with clinically suspected or confirmed high-risk prostate cancer, or suspected recurrence after treatment. The study will assess the ability of this imaging to detect lesions and its diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Histopathology and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months will be used as the reference standard. Participants will receive a single intravenous injection of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 and undergo a PET/CT scan about 1 hour later. For participants who have already undergone clinically routine PSMA PET imaging, a comparison between the two imaging modalities will be performed. The study will enroll 50 men aged 18 to 90 years. Additionally, the study will explore the correlation between semi-quantitative parameters derived from [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging and pathological markers (ACP3 expression assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue), and will evaluate the impact of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging on clinical treatment decisions.

Read the detailed description

Background Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. Accurate diagnosis, staging, and risk stratification are critical for optimal management. PSMA PET imaging has improved prostate cancer detection but has limitations, including heterogeneous PSMA expression leading to false negatives, and physiological uptake in salivary glands, liver, spleen, and intestine that can obscure lesions or cause false-positive findings. ACP3 (prostate acid phosphatase, PAP) is highly and homogeneously expressed in more than 95% of prostate cancer lesions but has low expression in healthy tissues. OncoACP3 is a small-molecule ligand with picomolar affinity for ACP3. Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET has favorable biodistribution, low background uptake, and high tumor-to-background ratios, potentially outperforming PSMA PET in certain settings.

Study Objectives Primary objective: To prospectively evaluate the lesion detection rate and diagnostic performance (including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging in men with clinically suspected or confirmed high-risk prostate cancer, or suspected recurrence after treatment.

Secondary objectives: (1) comparison with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET imaging in participants who have already undergone clinically routine PSMA PET; (2) correlation of semi-quantitative parameters derived from [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging with pathological markers (ACP3 expression assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue); (3) evaluation of the impact of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging on clinical treatment decisions.

Study Design This is a prospective, single-arm, single-center, open-label clinical study enrolling 50 male participants aged 18 to 90 years with clinically suspected or confirmed high-risk prostate cancer, or suspected recurrence after treatment. After enrollment and informed consent, participants will undergo [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET/CT imaging within 1 week. A single intravenous dose of 3-5 mCi [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 will be administered, followed by PET/CT imaging at 1 hour post-injection. For participants who have already undergone clinically routine PSMA PET imaging, a comparison between the two imaging modalities will be performed. Image analysis will include visual qualitative assessment and semi-quantitative analysis (e.g., standardized uptake value). The gold standard for diagnosis will be histopathological examination and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. The study will also assess the correlation between semi-quantitative PET parameters and ACP3 expression in tumor tissue, and evaluate the impact of imaging findings on clinical management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prostate acid phosphatase
  • [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET/CT
  • Diagnostic performance
  • Prostate cancer
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Voluntary participation and signed written informed consent before any study-specific procedures;
  • Male, aged 18 to 90 years;
  • Clinically suspected high-risk, histologically confirmed, or suspected recurrent prostate cancer after treatment;
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests, and other study-related procedures;
  • Expected survival time greater than 6 months;
  • Participants' partners agree to use reliable contraceptive measures (such as abstinence, sterilization surgery, oral contraceptives, injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate, or subdermal implants) during the study and for at least 6 months after the last dose of study drug.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected allergy to [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 injection or any of its excipients;
  • Any severe unstable disease (e.g., severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal insufficiency) that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for the study;
  • Inability to complete PET/CT examination, including inability to lie flat, claustrophobia, or radiophobia;
  • Poor compliance or any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for the study;
  • Prior use of a radiopharmaceutical within less than 10 physical half-lives before study drug administration;
  • Currently participating in or planning to participate in any drug or device clinical trial during the study period.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET Imaging

    Participants receive a single intravenous injection of 3-5 mCi \[68Ga\]Ga-OncoACP3, followed by PET/CT imaging at about 1 hour post-injection.

    Drug: [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3

Interventions

  • Drug[68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3

    \[68Ga\]Ga-OncoACP3 is a small-molecule PET imaging agent targeting ACP3 (prostate acid phosphatase). It is radiolabeled with Gallium-68 and administered as a single intravenous dose of 3-5 mCi. PET/CT imaging is performed at about 1 hour post-injection.

    Also known as: OncoACP3

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lesion Detection Rate of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET Imaging

    Proportion of participants with at least one prostate cancer lesion detected by \[68Ga\]Ga-OncoACP3 PET/CT imaging, using histopathology and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging

  2. Sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET Imaging

    Sensitivity of \[68Ga\]Ga-OncoACP3 PET/CT imaging for detecting tumor lesions, using histopathology and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging

  3. Specificity of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET Imaging

    Specificity of \[68Ga\]Ga-OncoACP3 PET/CT imaging for detecting tumor lesions, using histopathology and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging

  4. Accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET Imaging

    Accuracy of \[68Ga\]Ga-OncoACP3 PET/CT imaging for detecting tumor lesions, using histopathology and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET Imaging

    Comparison of lesion detection rate and diagnostic performance between \[68Ga\]Ga-OncoACP3 PET/CT and \[68Ga\]Ga-PSMA PET/CT in participants who have undergone clinically routine PSMA PET imaging.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging

  2. Correlation Between Semi-Quantitative PET Parameters and ACP3 Expression

    Correlation between semi-quantitative parameters (e.g., standardized uptake value) derived from \[68Ga\]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging and ACP3 expression assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging

  3. Impact on Clinical Treatment Decisions

    Proportion of participants whose clinical treatment decisions were changed based on \[68Ga\]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging findings.

    Time frame: Within 1 month after [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3 PET imaging

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
    Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Liang SH. ACP3-targeted PET imaging agents based on small-molecule ligands for prostate cancer diagnostics and theranostics. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2026 Jun 25;16(3):157-161. doi: 10.62347/LKNT6446. eCollection 2026. PubMed 42495193 ↗
  • Seifert KE, Reimann J, Rust M, Bogemann M, Schrader AJ, Schafers M, Bernemann C, Backhaus P. The prostatic acid phosphatase in prostate cancer: A novel theranostic target. Semin Nucl Med. 2026 Jul;56(4):748-758. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2026.03.004. Epub 2026 Apr 1. PubMed 41925410 ↗
  • Brosch-Lenz J, Buther F, Oehler S, Ciamarone A, Georgiev T, Schindler P, Landau F, Breyholz HJ, Ventura D, Rust M, Schlack K, Bogemann M, Puca E, Mock J, Cazzamalli S, Neri D, Rahbar K, Schrader AJ, Schafers M, Seifert KE, Backhaus P. Dynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Dosimetry of First-in-Human [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3-DOTA PET in Patients with Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2026 Jul 1;67(7):1079-1085. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.125.271933. PubMed 42061944 ↗
  • Backhaus P, Cazzamalli S, Oehler S, Buther F, Brosch-Lenz J, Landau F, Breyholz HJ, Claesener M, Migliorini F, Ciamarone A, Georgiev T, Mock J, Ventura D, Barca C, Schiefelbein L, Hermann S, Schafers K, Gierse F, Bernemann C, Schlack K, Bogemann M, Puca E, Schindler P, Neri D, Rahbar K, Schrader AJ, Seifert KE, Schafers M. Translational and First-in-Human Positron Emission Tomography Targeting Prostatic Acid Phosphatase in Prostate Cancer Using the Ligand [68Ga]Ga-OncoACP3-DOTA. Eur Urol. 2026 Apr;89(4):305-310. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.025. Epub 2025 Dec 17. PubMed 41412909 ↗
  • Georgiev T, Migliorini F, Ciamarone A, Mueller M, Biancofiore I, Faviana P, Bartoli F, Park Kim YS, Principi L, Gilardoni E, Bassi G, Favalli N, Puca E, Neri D, Oehler S, Cazzamalli S. Discovery of high-affinity ligands for prostatic acid phosphatase via DNA-encoded library screening enables targeted cancer therapy. Nat Biomed Eng. 2026 Jan;10(1):178-191. doi: 10.1038/s41551-025-01432-6. Epub 2025 Jun 26. PubMed 40571760 ↗
  • Heller JE. Prostatic acid phosphatase: its current clinical status. J Urol. 1987 Jun;137(6):1091-103. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44414-4. No abstract available. PubMed 3295298 ↗
  • Sheikhbahaei S, Werner RA, Solnes LB, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Gorin MA, Rowe SP. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Targeted PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer: An Update on Important Pitfalls. Semin Nucl Med. 2019 Jul;49(4):255-270. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Mar 4. PubMed 31227049 ↗
  • Bukavina L, Luckenbaugh AN, Hofman MS, Hope T, Kamran SC, Murphy DG, Yamoah K, Ost P. Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2023 Jun;83(6):521-533. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.024. Epub 2022 Nov 18. PubMed 36404204 ↗
  • Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, Rutherford N, Martin JM, Frydenberg M, Shakher R, Wong LM, Taubman K, Ting Lee S, Hsiao E, Roach P, Nottage M, Kirkwood I, Hayne D, Link E, Marusic P, Matera A, Herschtal A, Iravani A, Hicks RJ, Williams S, Murphy DG; proPSMA Study Group Collaborators. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1208-1216. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7. Epub 2020 Mar 22. PubMed 32209449 ↗
  • Han S, Woo S, Kim YJ, Suh CH. Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET on the Management of Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):179-190. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.030. Epub 2018 Apr 18. PubMed 29678358 ↗
  • Wang Y, Galante JR, Haroon A, Wan S, Afaq A, Payne H, Bomanji J, Adeleke S, Kasivisvanathan V. The future of PSMA PET and WB MRI as next-generation imaging tools in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2022 Aug;19(8):475-493. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00618-w. Epub 2022 Jul 4. PubMed 35789204 ↗
  • De Man K, Van Laeken N, Schelfhout V, Fendler WP, Lambert B, Kersemans K, Piron S, Lumen N, Decaestecker K, Fonteyne V, Delrue L, De Vos F, Ost P. 18F-PSMA-11 Versus 68Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Staging and Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Double-blind Randomised Cross-over Trial. Eur Urol. 2022 Nov;82(5):501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 Jun 8. PubMed 35690515 ↗
  • Prive BM, Israel B, Janssen MJR, van der Leest MMG, de Rooij M, van Ipenburg JA, Jonker M, Peters SMB, de Groot M, Zamecnik P, Hoepping A, Bomers JG, Gotthardt M, Sedelaar JPM, Barentsz JO, van Oort IM, Nagarajah J. Multiparametric MRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2024 May;311(2):e231879. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231879. PubMed 38771185 ↗
  • Hicks RM, Simko JP, Westphalen AC, Nguyen HG, Greene KL, Zhang L, Carroll PR, Hope TA. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Compared with Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2018 Dec;289(3):730-737. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180788. Epub 2018 Sep 18. PubMed 30226456 ↗
  • James ML, Gambhir SS. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiol Rev. 2012 Apr;92(2):897-965. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00049.2010. PubMed 22535898 ↗
  • Faria R, Soares MO, Spackman E, Ahmed HU, Brown LC, Kaplan R, Emberton M, Sculpher MJ. Optimising the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS). Eur Urol. 2018 Jan;73(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 19. PubMed 28935163 ↗
  • Woo S, Suh CH, Eastham JA, Zelefsky MJ, Morris MJ, Abida W, Scher HI, Sidlow R, Becker AS, Wibmer AG, Hricak H, Vargas HA. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-stratified Clinical Pathways and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Pathway for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Nov;2(6):605-616. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 14. PubMed 31204311 ↗
  • Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Zappa M, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Maattanen L, Lilja H, Denis LJ, Recker F, Paez A, Bangma CH, Carlsson S, Puliti D, Villers A, Rebillard X, Hakama M, Stenman UH, Kujala P, Taari K, Aus G, Huber A, van der Kwast TH, van Schaik RH, de Koning HJ, Moss SM, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014 Dec 6;384(9959):2027-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0. Epub 2014 Aug 6. PubMed 25108889 ↗
  • Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, Eberli D, De Meerleer G, De Santis M, Farolfi A, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Henry AM, Lardas M, van Leenders GJLH, Liew M, Linares Espinos E, Oldenburg J, van Oort IM, Oprea-Lager DE, Ploussard G, Roberts MJ, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Schouten N, Smith EJ, Stranne J, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Tilki D. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2024 Aug;86(2):148-163. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027. Epub 2024 Apr 13. PubMed 38614820 ↗
  • Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Adra N, Ahmed B, An Y, Bitting R, Chapin B, Cheng HH, Cho SY, D'Amico AV, Desai N, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Farrington TA, Gao X, Gupta S, Ippolito JE, Karnes RJ, Kishan A, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, Lee D, Lotan T, McDonald A, Morgan T, Pessoa R, Rais-Bahrami S, Roach M 3rd, Robin T, Rosenfeld S, Scarpato KR, Shabsigh A, Szmulewitz R, Teply BA, Tward J, Valicenti R, VanderWeele D, Wong JK, Kovach E, Freedman-Cass D. Prostate Cancer, Version 3.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2025 Nov;23(11):469-493. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2025.0052. PubMed 41213253 ↗
  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PubMed 33538338 ↗
  • Schafer EJ, Laversanne M, Sung H, Soerjomataram I, Briganti A, Dahut W, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Patterns and Trends in Global Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality: An Update. Eur Urol. 2025 Mar;87(3):302-313. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.013. Epub 2024 Dec 11. PubMed 39668103 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07830212
Lead sponsor
Yong He
Responsible party
Yong He (Director, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Yong He, MD, PhD
Contact
heyong@whu.edu.cn
027-67812837

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion