ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07827872Updated Sep 18, 2026

Neoadjuvant Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy for cT2N0M0 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Sintilimab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC), Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Early-stage Oral Cancer, sponsored by caohaotian. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by caohaotian · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 11 studies testing sintilimab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck — 7 open to participants now, 8 under way, 2 of them phase 3. sintilimab · Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck.

Planned enrollment
Largest of 11
300 · median 51
Started
2026
with 3 others
Phase 3
2 of 11
2 open now
Registered
11th of 11
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 11
caohaotian

Among the 11 studies testing sintilimab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, this one has the largest planned enrollment, is one of 4 that started in 2026, is one of 2 in phase 3, and was the 11th registered.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

2,019 studies on the registry are indexed under Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; 573 are open to participants now.

Browse Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 11 studies testing sintilimab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 7 open studies →

Where they have run

About sintilimab

No approval found in the FDA or EMA files read. How studies give it is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 433 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck studies recruiting now, 309 (71%) set no upper age limit and 87 (20%) stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; 13 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies testing sintilimab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study is a superiority multi-center, open-label, phase III randomized controlled trial. It will further verify the clinical value of xidili single-antibody combined with chemotherapy (albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin) in neoadjuvant treatment for operable cT2N0M0 early oral squamous cell carcinoma (Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, OSCC) patients in terms of improving long-term survival and pathological remission. The study subjects are patients aged 18-75 years, diagnosed with cT2N0M0 stage (8th edition AJCC staging as stage II) OSCC by pathology, with ECOG score of 0-1, good organ function, and meeting laboratory standards (ANC ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L, Hb > 90g/L, CrCl ≥ 60ml/min, ALT/AST ≤ 2.5 × ULN); Exclusion criteria include previous immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, active autoimmune diseases, poorly controlled comorbidities, high viral load infection of HBV/HCV, etc.; Patients with surgical resection conditions and signing informed consent will be enrolled. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups at a ratio of 1:1: The experimental group received neoadjuvant treatment with xidili single-antibody combined with albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin for 2-3 cycles followed by surgery (primary lesion resection + I-III region cervical lymph node dissection), while the control group received standard treatment (direct surgery). The primary endpoint of the study is the 3-year event-free survival rate (Event-Free Survival rate, EFS rate), and secondary endpoints include overall survival rate (Overall survival rate, OS rate), major pathological response rate (Major Pathological Response, MPR), complete pathological response rate (Complete Pathological Response, pCR), objective response rate (Objective Response Rate, ORR), safety analysis (Treatment-Related Adverse Event, TRAE), and postoperative lymph node positive rate (Lymph Node Positivity rate, LNP rate). The sample size was calculated based on the Log-rank test, referring to the prospective clinical baseline data of standard surgical treatment for early oral cancer, setting the 3-year EFS rate of the control group at 80%, assuming that the experimental group can be improved to 90% (HR = 0.47), setting a two-sided α = 0.05, efficacy 80%, and follow-up dropout rate 10%, a total of 300 patients (150 in each group) need to be enrolled. This study will provide high-quality evidence-based evidence for optimizing the treatment strategy for cT2N0M0 early high-risk oral squamous cell carcinoma, improving the pathological response rate and long-term recurrence-free survival.

Read the detailed description

OSCC accounts for over 90% of oral malignancies and is one of the most common malignant tumors in the head and neck region. According to the latest global cancer statistics from GLOBOCAN 2022, there are approximately 389,000 new cases of OSCC worldwide each year, with about 188,000 deaths. In China, there are approximately 37,000 new cases, and the incidence and mortality rates are among the highest globally . Currently, authoritative guidelines such as NCCN/CSCO recommend the implementation of extended resection of the primary lesion and prophylactic neck lymph node dissection for the standard treatment of early OSCC (cT1-2N0M0). However, this classic local regional control strategy is facing clinical bottlenecks that are difficult to overcome. Firstly, even for early patients who were highly dependent on imaging assessment as cN0 before surgery, the rate of occult cervical lymph node metastasis confirmed by postoperative pathology still reaches 20%-40% . Studies have shown that tumor invasion depth (Depth of Invasion, DOI) is a key independent indicator for predicting lymph node metastasis, and when DOI > 4mm, the risk of occult metastasis increases . Therefore, elective neck dissection (END) can reduce the mortality risk by 36% compared to salvage neck dissection, establishing the standard status of END ; although subsequent studies have confirmed that the navigation strategy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is not inferior to traditional END in local control , lymph node metastasis remains the most significant driving factor for postoperative recurrence and deterioration of survival. More importantly, whether END or SLNB, they are essentially local anatomical clearance methods that cannot effectively reverse the already existing systemic micro-residual disease (Minimal Residual Disease, MRD) in the peripheral blood or lymph circulation. Data show that even after standard primary lesion resection and END, 20%-30% of early patients still experience local regional recurrence or distant metastasis during follow-up . Real-world studies and systematic reviews further indicate that the 5-year OS of early OSCC patients under the current model can reach 75%-85%, but the 5-year disease-free survival rate (Disease-Free Survival, DFS) is only 60%-80%. Compared to I/II stage breast cancer (5-year OS reaching 93.1%-99.2%) or early lung cancer (5-year OS reaching over 92%), the long-term cure rate of early OSCC is significantly lagging behind. Even more challenging is that the recurrence of early OSCC mainly occurs within 3 years after surgery, and survival deteriorates sharply after recurrence, with the 5-year OS after salvage treatment being less than 30% . Therefore, how to implement systemic treatment at the initial stage to eliminate occult micro-metastases, reduce the risk of postoperative recurrence, is a key scientific issue for further improving the survival of early OSCC patients.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an important breakthrough in the treatment of malignant tumors. ICIs such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, due to their good safety and wide indications, show better clinical application prospects and significant clinical benefits in various solid tumors. Unlike traditional cytotoxic drugs, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors relieve the immune suppression mediated by tumor cells, restore the anti-tumor activity of T cells, and thereby achieve continuous anti-tumor effects. More and more studies suggest that, compared with the advanced disease stage, early resectable tumors are also suitable as the window period for immunotherapy intervention. The intact primary tumor can continuously provide abundant tumor antigens, promoting dendritic cell antigen presentation and the clonal expansion of tumor-specific T cells, and facilitating the early clearance of imaging-undetectable micrometastases and the establishment of long-term immune memory .

This concept of "perioperative immunotherapy" has become an important development direction in the field of solid tumor treatment. In the field of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the CheckMate-816 study first confirmed that nivolumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment could significantly increase the pCR rate (24.0% vs 2.2%) and MPR rate, and significantly improve EFS . Subsequently, KEYNOTE-671 and AEGEAN studies further confirmed that the perioperative treatment mode based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could continuously improve EFS and OS, promoting perioperative immunotherapy to become an important treatment strategy for resectable early NSCLC . In the field of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the KEYNOTE-522 study showed that pembrolizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy could increase the pCR rate from 51.2% to 64.8%, and significantly improve long-term survival outcomes. Further follow-up results showed that the combined treatment group had better 5-year EFS and OS than the control group, with a reduction in death risk of approximately 34%, ultimately establishing the standard treatment position of perioperative immunotherapy in early high-risk TNBC . These successful cases collectively indicate that in early solid tumors with a chance of radical cure, moving immunotherapy forward to the perioperative stage not only improves the pathological response rate but can directly translate into long-term survival benefits.

In the field of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the front line of immune systemic treatment has also experienced a rapid advancement from late rescue to perioperative placement. Initially, the KEYNOTE-048 study first established the dominant position of pembrolizumab monotherapy or combined with platinum + 5-FU chemotherapy as the first-line standard treatment for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC, which significantly prolonged the OS of patients compared to the traditional EXTREME regimen, and this regimen was also recommended by international guidelines such as NCCN and ESMO. After achieving a milestone breakthrough in the first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic cases, the academic community began to explore the timing of immunological intervention to be moved forward to the "locally advanced resectable" stage. The landmark KEYNOTE-689 randomized controlled clinical study published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) officially ushered in a historic breakthrough. This study confirmed that in resectable locally advanced HNSCC patients, using perioperative pembrolizumab (2 cycles of preoperative neoadjuvant + 15 cycles of postoperative adjuvant) combined with standard treatment (surgery ± postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy) could significantly prolong the EFS of patients, without increasing the risk of surgery delay or postoperative complications . Based on the epoch-making breakthrough achieved by the KEYNOTE-689 study, this perioperative immunotherapy combination has been officially included in the NCCN head and neck tumor clinical practice guidelines (version 1, 2026), establishing its position as the first-line standard treatment for locally advanced resectable HNSCC . This major guideline update not only fully validates the biological and pharmacological rationality of applying PD-1 inhibitors during the perioperative period for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on an international scale, but also provides the most solid top-level evidence-based medical basis for further advancing immunotherapy to earlier stages of OSCC with potential latent metastasis and high-risk recurrence characteristics.

Based on the above scientific frontiers, our center has conducted a two-stage, progressive, and prospective single-center exploratory clinical study on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for early OSCC. In the first stage of the exploration, we initiated a single-center study ("2-cycle PD-1 monoclonal antibody combined with chemotherapy neoadjuvant treatment + local extended resection (without routine neck dissection) for early oral squamous cell carcinoma") (NCT06130332). The results showed that the experimental group achieved better pathological and survival benefits: ORR reached 85.0%, and the MPR rate was as high as 95.0% . During the follow-up, the 2-year EFS rate of the experimental group reached 94.7%, and the 2-year OS rate reached 100.0% , successfully achieving the preset non-inferiority endpoint. In addition, the safety of neoadjuvant treatment was excellent, and the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that of the control group undergoing direct surgery, and it also had better quality of life and health economics benefits.

To fully eliminate the potential threat of latent lymph node metastasis to the long-term EFS of patients, our center further conducted an exploratory study in the second stage ("PD-1 monoclonal antibody combined with TP neoadjuvant treatment + radical extended resection + cervical lymph node dissection for cT1-2N0M0 oral squamous cell carcinoma") (NCT07267286). The results further confirmed the excellent efficacy of this combined regimen while maintaining extremely high clinical safety: the postoperative pathological MPR rate of the experimental group was as high as 72.0%, and the 2-year follow-up EFS reached 100.0% . This series of preliminary exploration data not only fully demonstrated the safety of the regimen, but also clearly indicated that preoperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, in combination with the standard primary lesion resection and cervical dissection during surgery, could generate a powerful regional and systemic synergistic control effect.

In the study design, this research clearly targeted cT2N0M0 patients in the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system as the research subjects, and strictly excluded cT1N0M0 patients. This screening logic lies in the precise balance of biology and clinical "risk-benefit" of early OSCC. Firstly, this measure can effectively avoid "excessive treatment" and "benefit ceiling" for cT1N0M0 patients. Evidence-based medical data shows that after standard surgical treatment for cT1N0M0 patients, their 5-year OS has reached 85%-90%, and some superficial lesions even approach 95%. This means that the efficacy of routine surgery for this population has reached the "ceiling", and if new adjuvant immunotherapy chemotherapy is blindly added during the perioperative period, not only will it bring more significant survival benefits, but it will also increase the possibility of systemic toxic side effects. On the contrary, this project can precisely target cT2N0M0 patients with potential high-risk characteristics. The latest 8th edition of the AJCC staging system assigns core T stage weight to DOI, precisely because most cT2 patients have DOI > 4mm accompanied by a 20%-40% high risk of latent lymph node metastasis and high tumor burden . Although these patients are early resectable, their tumor infiltration depth is large and they are at the edge of peripheral micrometastasis, and they are high-risk groups for traditional surgical treatment failure and short-term recurrence. Therefore, the cT2N0M0 population not only has a relatively high probability of clinical cure, but also faces the threat of recurrence due to latent micrometastasis. At this stage, early intervention is most likely to significantly reduce the recurrence rate.

This plan selects Xidiliantumab combined with the TP regimen (albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin) as the core for preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, which has a solid basis of molecular pharmacology for synergistic enhancement. Xidiliantumab (development code: IBI308) is a recombinant fully human IgG4-type PD-1 monoclonal antibody, independently developed by Sinopharm Biopharmaceuticals (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Sinopharm Company"). It specifically binds to the PD-1 molecule on the surface of T lymphocytes, thereby blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway that leads to tumor immune tolerance, and reactivates the anti-tumor activity of T lymphocytes to achieve the purpose of treating tumors. Xidiliantumab and nivolumab as well as pembrolizumab target the same target, but have different amino acid sequences. Multiple preclinical in vitro experiments have verified the effect of Xidiliantumab in blocking the PD-1 pathway, and the results of completed preclinical pharmacodynamics, animal pharmacokinetics and toxicology studies have shown that Xidiliantumab has the characteristics of clear target, reliable cell line source and good drug stability. Multiple clinical studies have also confirmed its effectiveness and safety in clinical application, and it has been approved for indications in multiple tumor types such as Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-small cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, and endometrial cancer.

The clinical research of Xidiliantumab in the HNSCC field has accumulated certain evidence. A single-arm prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with Xidiliantumab in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, including 10 patients, of which 8 cases could undergo radiological assessment . The results showed that the ORR was 50%, the disease control rate reached 100%, the mOS was 4.37 months, and the 1-year OS was 37.5%. In terms of safety, 50% of the patients experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events, the most common being tumor pain (50%), hypertension (37.5%), and tumor bleeding.

Another prospective study included 163 patients with locally advanced HNSCC, of which 98 cases received chemotherapy alone, and 65 cases received Xidiliantumab combined with chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 28.0 months, the ORR of the combined treatment group was significantly higher than that of the chemotherapy alone group (84.6% vs 68.4%, p = 0.019). In addition, the 2-year progression-free survival rate (PFS) of the combined treatment group was 44% (95% CI: 32%-56%), significantly better than that of the chemotherapy alone group (27% (95% CI: 18%-36%), p = 0.041). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 or higher acute toxic reactions between the two groups (18.5% in the combined group vs 15.3% in the chemotherapy group, p > 0.05).

On the other hand, paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (TP regimen) is a first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The induction chemotherapy of carboplatin combined with paclitaxel can provide 8% to 33% and 50% to 85% complete response rates and partial response rates respectively . Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has shown better response rates in various tumors and can induce immunogenic cell death to release tumor antigens , generating a strong pharmacological synergy with PD-1 inhibitors. Therefore, Xidiliantumab combined with carboplatin and albumin paclitaxel has strong clinical application prospects in neoadjuvant treatment of oral cancer.

Based on this, this project intends to conduct a randomized controlled, open-label, multicenter, phase III clinical study of xidili single-agent combined with chemotherapy for neoadjuvant treatment of cT2N0M0 early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. The aim is to further improve the prognosis of cT2N0M0 stage oral cancer patients during the perioperative management, provide new evidence-based guidance for the precise diagnosis and treatment of this population, and potentially promote the update of future clinical treatment guidelines.

03

Conditions studied

  • Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC)
  • Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Early-stage Oral Cancer

Keywords

  • Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy
  • Sintilimab
  • Chemotherapy
  • Early-stage oral cancer
  • cT2N0M0
  • PD-1 Inhibitor
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. confirmed primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
  2. Clinical stage cT2N0M0 according to the AJCC 8th edition staging system.
  3. Age between 18 and 75 years old.
  4. (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  5. Deemed eligible for radical surgical resection of the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes.
  6. Adequate organ function within 14 days prior to randomization:

    • (ANC) >= 1.5 x 10\^9/L
    • >= 100 x 10\^9/L
    • >= 9.0 g/dL
    • Total \<= 1.5 x (ULN)
    • and ALT \<= 2.5 x ULN
    • Serum creatinine \<= 1.5 x ULN or >= 50 mL/min
  7. Voluntary written provided by the patient or legal representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of regional lymph node or distant metastasis (cN+ or M1).
  2. Prior systemic antitumor therapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy for head and neck cancer.
  3. History of other active malignant neoplasms within the past 5 years (except adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ).
  4. Active disease or history of severe autoimmune disease requiring systemic or agents.
  5. Severe cardiovascular disease, including unstable angina, myocardial infarction within 6 months, or uncontrolled heart failure ( Class III/IV).
  6. Active infection requiring systemic intravenous antimicrobial treatment.
  7. Known history of severe allergy or to sintilimab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, carboplatin, or their .
  8. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or patients of unwilling to use effective during the study and for 6 months after the last dose.
  9. Any underlying medical condition or psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would jeopardize participant safety or trial compliance.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(19)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Arm: Sintilimab + Chemotherapy

    Patients receive neoadjuvant Sintilimab combined with chemotherapy (Nab-Paclitaxel + Carboplatin) prior to surgery, followed by standard radical surgery.

    Drug: Sintilimab · Drug: Nab-Paclitaxel · Drug: Carboplatin · Procedure: Radical Surgery

  • Active comparator
    Control Arm: Upfront Surgery

    Patients receive upfront standard radical surgery without neoadjuvant therapy.

    Procedure: Radical Surgery

Interventions

  • 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W)

  • 260 mg/m² intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (Q3W)

  • AUC 5 intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (Q3W).

  • ProcedureRadical Surgery

    Standard radical resection of oral tumor and regional lymph node dissection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 3-Year Event-Free Survival (EFS)

    Percentage of participants who remain alive without disease progression, local or regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or second primary malignancy at 3 years following randomization.

    Time frame: 3 years post-randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate

    Percentage of participants with 0% viable residual tumor cells in the resected primary tumor and lymph nodes upon surgical resection.

    Time frame: At the time of surgery

  2. Major Pathological Response (MPR) Rate

    Percentage of participants with \<= 10% viable residual tumor cells in the resected primary tumor and lymph nodes upon surgical resection.

    Time frame: At the time of surgery

  3. Overall Survival (OS)

    Percentage of participants who remain alive from randomization to death from any cause at 3 years.

    Time frame: 3 years post-randomization

  4. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Percentage of participants achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) assessed according to RECIST v1.1 after neoadjuvant therapy.

    Time frame: Prior to surgery

  5. Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

    Incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events graded according to CTCAE v5.0.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days following the last dose of study treatment

  6. Pathological Lymph Node Positivity Rate

    Percentage of participants with pathologically confirmed regional lymph node metastasis among those who underwent neck dissection during surgery.

    Time frame: At the time of surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2032, 72 months later.

Of 51 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, half reached primary completion within 95 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 67 and three quarters within 121. This study's planned 72 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 78 studies reached it within 76 months; a quarter within 38 and three quarters within 117.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 14, 2026
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2032
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2032
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07827872
Lead sponsor
caohaotian
Responsible party
caohaotian (Chief Physician, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2032 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Haotian Cao, Ph.D.
Contact
caobleat@hotmail.com
86+19927631809
Jinsong Li, Ph.D.
Contact
lijinsong1967@163.com
86+13609001967

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sintilimab

Start the discussion