An interventional study of Gamified Feedback and Conventional Formative Feedback in Nursing Education, sponsored by Chang Gung University of Science and Technology. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.
Sponsored by Chang Gung University of Science and Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
This study examines the effects of an AI dialogue-based scenario simulation integrated with concept mapping and post-dialogue feedback on nursing students' learning. Nursing students will participate in pediatric care scenarios using standardized AI-supported dialogues. Two feedback approaches will be compared: gamified feedback and conventional formative feedback without gamification elements. The study will examine students' flow experience and learning performance and explore how collaborative processes and interaction mechanisms may contribute to these outcomes. The findings are expected to provide evidence on how different feedback approaches influence students' engagement and learning during AI-supported scenario simulation.
Chang Gung University of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the designated nursing course during the study period.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Students who decline or do not provide .
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants receive a concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by gamified feedback. The feedback includes gamification elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features.
Behavioral: Gamified Feedback
Participants receive the same concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by conventional formative feedback without gamification elements.
Behavioral: Conventional Formative Feedback
Gamified feedback is delivered following the AI dialogue-based scenario simulation and includes game-related elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features.
Conventional formative feedback is delivered following the same AI dialogue-based scenario simulation without gamification elements.
Flow Experience
Flow experience will be assessed using the 8-item Flow Experience Questionnaire developed by Pearce et al. (2005). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate a greater level of flow experience. Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the distribution and change in flow scores, missing data, and internal consistency.
Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after completion of the intervention (approximately Week 18).
Academic Learning Performance
Academic learning performance will be assessed using students' course midterm and final examination scores. Higher scores indicate better academic performance.
Time frame: At approximately Week 9 (midterm examination) and Week 18 (final examination) of the academic semester.
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic motivation will be assessed using a 25-item version of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), based on the IMI framework of McAuley et al. (1989) and the version adapted by Yin et al. (2021). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The instrument assesses five dimensions: interest/enjoyment, pressure/tension, perceived choice, perceived competence, and perceived value. Reverse-coded items will be recoded before analysis, and each subscale score will be calculated as the mean of its constituent items.
Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after completion of the intervention (approximately Week 18).
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 3 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Chang Gung University of Science and Technology