An interventional study of DSA-VDet v1.0 in DSA, Bleeding and AI (Artificial Intelligence), sponsored by Zhongda Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.
Sponsored by Zhongda Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Clinically, DSA-VDet can continuously indicate suspected bleeding regions throughout a complete angiographic sequence and provide a second-reader opinion to the operator. It is expected to reduce the time required for frame-by-frame review and localization of culprit vessels, reduce missed detection of small, multiple, or unusually located bleeding sites, and improve consistency among physicians with different levels of experience. Faster culprit-vessel localization may also reduce repeat angiography, radiation exposure, and unnecessary superselective catheterization. These potential benefits will be tested in the prospective randomized trial; the study does not assume that the model will necessarily improve clinical outcomes. From a translational perspective, the study will establish a standardized temporal DSA database spanning multiple centers, devices, and anatomical regions, together with bleeding-site annotation standards, a model suitable for real-time deployment, and a pathway for clinical evaluation. These resources may provide a reproducible technical foundation for regional collaboration in emergency interventional care and AI-assisted interpretation in lower-resource hospitals.
The core value of this study is therefore to address the 'single-region, weak-temporal, algorithm-centered, clinically under-evaluated' limitations of existing models. Using multicenter DSA videos from multiple anatomical regions, the study will leverage contrast kinetics and motion information to improve detection of small bleeding sites and will progress from retrospective validation through controlled physician interpretation to a prospective randomized trial, providing a continuous evaluation from technical performance to clinical benefit.
1,383 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhage; 244 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,324 is above the median of 102 across 926 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhage.
Browse Hemorrhage studies →Zhongda Hospital is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Platelets
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
During DSA acquisition, DSA-VDet v1.0 will perform continuous frame-by-frame inference and continuously display suspected bleeding regions, confidence scores, and relevant frame indices. The operator will retain responsibility for the final diagnosis, selection of culprit vessels, and all angiographic and embolization decisions.
Device: DSA-VDet v1.0
The operator will perform frame-by-frame interpretation using the conventional DSA equipment and established workflow, without access to DSA-VDet output. Images may undergo offline model analysis after completion of the index procedure for exploratory purposes, but those results must not be available for the index clinical decision.
During DSA acquisition, DSA-VDet v1.0 will perform continuous frame-by-frame inference and continuously display suspected bleeding regions, confidence scores, and relevant frame indices. The operator will retain responsibility for the final diagnosis, selection of culprit vessels, and all angiographic and embolization decisions.
the time from the start of the first diagnostic DSA acquisition to achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint
To determine whether real-time DSA-VDet v1.0 assistance shortens the time from the start of the first diagnostic DSA acquisition to achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, compared with conventional interpretation.
Time frame: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet
To evaluate the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet in DSA sequences acquired across multiple anatomical regions; to assess its effects on interpretation accuracy, interpretation time, and interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience; and to compare total procedure duration, technical embolization success, repeat angiographic acquisitions, radiation exposure, contrast-medium volume, intraprocedural complications, and adverse events through postprocedure day 30 between the randomized groups.
Time frame: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
effects on interpretation accuracy
To evaluate the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet in DSA sequences acquired across multiple anatomical regions; to assess its effects on interpretation accuracy, interpretation time, and interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience; and to compare total procedure duration, technical embolization success, repeat angiographic acquisitions, radiation exposure, contrast-medium volume, intraprocedural complications, and adverse events through postprocedure day 30 between the randomized groups.
Time frame: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
interpretation time
To evaluate the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet in DSA sequences acquired across multiple anatomical regions; to assess its effects on interpretation accuracy, interpretation time, and interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience; and to compare total procedure duration, technical embolization success, repeat angiographic acquisitions, radiation exposure, contrast-medium volume, intraprocedural complications, and adverse events through postprocedure day 30 between the randomized groups.
Time frame: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience
To evaluate the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet in DSA sequences acquired across multiple anatomical regions; to assess its effects on interpretation accuracy, interpretation time, and interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience; and to compare total procedure duration, technical embolization success, repeat angiographic acquisitions, radiation exposure, contrast-medium volume, intraprocedural complications, and adverse events through postprocedure day 30 between the randomized groups.
Time frame: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 12 months later.
Of 191 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hemorrhage, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 12 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 226 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 35.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.