ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07816848Updated Sep 15, 2026

Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate for Post-Endoscopic Symptoms After Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy With Biopsy

An interventional study of Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) infusion and 0.9 % sodium chloride in Procedural Pain, sponsored by Hasanuddin University. Completed at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Hasanuddin University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2026, registered Sep 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated whether intravenous magnesium sulfate reduces esophageal symptoms after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) with biopsy in adult patients. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intravenous magnesium sulfate or 0.9% sodium chloride placebo. Post-endoscopic esophageal symptoms were assessed using the Modified Esophageal Symptoms Questionnaire (M-ESQ) at 1, 4, 24, and 48 hours after the procedure. Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and total calcium concentrations were measured before the procedure and 1 hour after the procedure to evaluate inflammatory and pharmacodynamic responses to magnesium sulfate.

Read the detailed description

Post-endoscopic esophageal symptoms following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) with mucosal biopsy may arise from mechanical mucosal injury, acute inflammatory activation, and nociceptive sensitization. Magnesium sulfate may modulate these responses through antagonism of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activity, regulation of calcium influx, and attenuation of pro-inflammatory signaling.

Eligible participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio using computer-generated block randomization with variable block sizes of 4 and 6. Allocation concealment was maintained using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. Participants, endoscopists, postoperative outcome assessors, laboratory analysts, and statisticians were blinded to treatment allocation. The attending anesthesiologist was aware of group assignment for patient safety but was not involved in postoperative outcome assessment or statistical analysis. Perioperative anesthesia and monitoring were standardized for both treatment groups.

In addition to evaluating post-endoscopic symptom severity and peri-procedural changes in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and total serum calcium, an exploratory analysis examined the association between the change in serum IL-6 from baseline to 1 hour after the procedure and the Modifies Esophageal Symptomps Questionnaire score measured at the corresponding 1-hour postprocedural time point. This association was evaluated using Spearman rank correlation in the overall study population and separately within each treatment group.

Participants were monitored for magnesium-related adverse effects, including hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, muscle weakness, and altered mental status. Intravenous calcium gluconate was available as rescue treatment in the event of clinically suspected magnesium toxicity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Procedural Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Mucosal Biopsy
  • Magnesium Sulfate
  • Modified Esophageal Symptoms Questionnaire
  • Interleukin-6
  • Serum Calcium
  • Perioperative Analgesia
  • Post-Endoscopic Esophageal Symptoms
03

In context

Pain, Procedural

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Procedural; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 90 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Procedural.

Browse Pain, Procedural studies →

Lead sponsor

Hasanuddin University is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Scheduled to undergo elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) with mucosal under general anesthesia.
  • (ASA) physical status I-III.
  • Able to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of to magnesium sulfate.
  • Severe renal dysfunction.
  • Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block.
  • Neuromuscular disease.
  • Chronic opioid therapy.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any condition that could interfere with completion of postoperative assessments.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate

    Participants received intravenous magnesium sulfate at a loading dose of 50 mg/kg over 15 minutes before induction of anesthesia, followed by a continuous infusion of 25 mg/kg/hour until completion of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedure.

    Drug: Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) infusion

  • Placebo comparator
    0.9% Sodium Chloride

    Participants received 0.9% normal saline placebo at an identical volume and infusion rate to the magnesium sulfate intervention.

    Drug: 0.9 % sodium chloride

Interventions

  • Magnesium sulfate was administered intravenously at a loading dose of 50 mg/kg body weight over 15 minutes before induction of anesthesia, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 25 mg/kg/hour until completion of the UGIE procedure. Infusions were administered using a syringe pump.

    Also known as: MgSO4

  • Drug0.9 % sodium chloride

    0.9% normal saline was administered intravenously using an identical volume and infusion rate to the magnesium sulfate intervention and was delivered using a syringe pump.

    Also known as: Normal Saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-Endoscopic Esophageal Symptom Severity Assessed Using the Modified Esophageal Symptoms Questionnaire

    The Modified Esophageal Symptoms Questionnaire (M-ESQ) is an 11-item patient-reported questionnaire assessing the severity of esophageal symptoms. Each item is scored from 1 (not severe) to 7 (very severe). Item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 11 to 77. Higher total scores indicate more severe esophageal symptoms and therefore a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 1, 4, 24, and 48 hours after completion of Upper Gastrointestinal Endocopy (UGIE) with biopsy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Serum Interleukin-6 Concentration

    Change in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentration was defined as the serum IL-6 concentration measured 1 hour after completion of UGIE minus the baseline concentration measured immediately before the study intervention and UGIE. IL-6 concentrations were measured in pg/mL using the Human IL-6 ELISA Kit, BT LAB® (Cat. No. E0090Hu).

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 hour after completion of UGIE

  2. Change in Total Serum Calcium Concentration

    Change in total serum calcium concentration was defined as the total serum calcium concentration measured 1 hour after completion of UGIE minus the baseline concentration measured immediately before the study intervention and UGIE. Total serum calcium was measured using a colorimetric/spectrophotometric assay and reported in mg/dL.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 hour after completion of UGIE

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital
    Makassar, South Sulawesi 90221, Indonesia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2026 to primary completion in Jun 2026, 3 months.

Of 141 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Procedural, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 141 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2026
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
StartActual
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2026
CompletionActual
Jul 15, 2026
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07816848
Lead sponsor
Hasanuddin University
Responsible party
Fiqih Eka Putra (Resident in Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Hasanuddin University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026
Completion
Jul 15, 2026
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Fiqih E Putra, S.Ked
principal investigator · Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Magnesium sulfate anhydrous

Start the discussion