ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07812233Updated Oct 16, 2026

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback for Anxiety in Autistic Youth

A Phase 2 interventional study of Lief Smart Patch in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Anxiety, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 16, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in United States+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) is a breathing-based intervention that reduces anxiety in a range of populations. Second-generation wearable HRVB devices not only deliver scheduled biofeedback practice sessions but also allow patients to practice HRVB in-the-moment when it is needed most. This study is testing the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of second-generation, ambulatory HRVB for the treatment of anxiety in autistic youth.

Read the detailed description

Fifty youth with autism and clinically significant anxiety will be recruited to participate in a single-arm, 8-week open-label, fully remote trial of HRVB. Participants will utilize the Lief Smart Patch which delivers HRVB training and practice through an embedded ECG monitor, accelerometer, and companion smartphone app. Specific aims of the research include: 1) Determine the acceptability and feasibility of second generation HRVB in autistic youth; and 2) Evaluate the preliminary efficacy of HRVB for the treatment of anxiety in autistic youth.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Anxiety

Keywords

  • heart rate variability biofeedback
  • Lief
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • anxiety
03

In context

Autism Spectrum Disorder

1,724 studies on the registry are indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 52 across 1,368 interventional studies indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Browse Autism Spectrum Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,586 studies on the registry; 447 are open to participants now.

Of its 222 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 12-17 years at the time of enrollment.
  2. ASD diagnosis from a qualified health professional based on medical records and confirmed based on , Fifth Edition (DSM 5) criteria by the study clinician.
  3. IQ ≥50 based on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT-2).
  4. anxiety, based on the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) 5-item score of ≥10.
  5. Stable medications for ≥30 days.
  6. English speaking.
  7. Willing to wear the Lief Smart Patch for 8 weeks.
  8. English speaking guardian who is willing and able to complete caregiver assessments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. cardiac arrhythmia based on parent report.
  2. Current primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder, psychosis, substance use disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, eating disorder, or major depressive disorder that requires a different treatment based in the opinion of the PI.
  3. Acutely unstable medical/psychiatric condition (e.g. self-injury, suicidality) that would preclude study participation in the opinion of the PI
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Heart rate variability biofeedback

    Participants will be asked to practice HRVB for 5 minutes twice per day at times of their choosing throughout the 8-week trial. In addition to scheduled practice sessions, participants will be asked to respond to just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) prompts to do brief, \~2-minute bursts of HRVB when the device senses autonomic hyperarousal. Participants will be instructed to complete ≥5 minutes per day of JITAI-delivered HRVB, self-initiated HRVB in response to self-perceived anxiety or stress, or any combination of these two practice modes.

    Device: Lief Smart Patch

Interventions

  • DeviceLief Smart Patch

    The Lief Smart Patch is a commercially available, noninvasive wearable heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) device. The patch includes an embedded electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor and accelerometer that interfaces with a companion smartphone application to deliver paced breathing exercises and just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) prompts. It is an externally worn patch that temporarily adheres to the skin surface and can be removed by the participant.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean 8-Week Change in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) 5-Item Total Score

    The PARS, a clinician-administered measure of child anxiety symptom severity based on both patient and parent-report will be the primary outcome measure. It has demonstrated inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and has previously been used by our group as the primary outcome measure in a RCT of mirtazapine for anxiety in youth with ASD, demonstrating sensitivity to change. The 5-item PARS score will be the primary outcome measure for this trial. Scaled score ranges from 0-25 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 reported

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants who Responded to Treatment at 8 Weeks According to the Improvement Item of the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) (Response Defined as CGI-I = 1 or 2)

    The Clinical Global Impressions Global Improvement (CGI-I) is designed to take into account all factors to arrive at an assessment of response to treatment. The CGI-I scale ranges from 1 to 7 (1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse), with lower scales indicating improvement (1=very much improved; 2=much improved). In this study, the CGI-I will be focused on the target symptom of anxiety.

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8. Week 8 score reported.

  2. Mean 8-Week Change in Clinical Global Impression Severity Subscale (CGI-S)

    The CGI-S is rated on a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = normal, not at all ill; 3 = mildly ill; 5 = markedly ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill patients. The CGI-S will be rated based on the severity of anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 reported.

  3. Mean 8-Week Change in Parent-Rated Anxiety Scale for Autism Spectrum Disorder (PRAS-ASD) Score

    The PRAS-ASD is a novel parent-rated 25-item scale with demonstrated reliability and validity. Scores range from 0-75, with higher scores indicating more severe parent-rated anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 reported.

  4. mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) Standalone Apps for Patients

    Mean Likert rating on the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) Standalone Apps for Patients. The MAUQ includes 18 questions, each rated on a Likert scale of 1-7. Total scores range from 18-126, with higher scores indicating increased usability.

    Time frame: Week 8

  5. Feasibility

    Proportion of enrolled youth meeting the scheduled daily practice criterion (≥50% study days with ≥5 minutes combined JITAI-delivered and self-initiated HRVB practice).

    Time frame: Week 8

Other outcomes

  1. Mean 8-Week Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-2) Irritability Subscale Score

    The ABC-2 is a 58-item questionnaire with 5 subscales derived by factor analysis. It has been extensively used in psychopharmacological studies of ASD and assesses many symptoms that are either central to autism or frequently a target of treatment. The Irritability Subscale is derived from 15 items, with a score range from 0-45, where higher scores indicate more severe irritability.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 reported

  2. Mean 8-Week Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-2) Lethargy/Social Withdrawal Subscale Score

    The ABC-2 is a 58-item questionnaire with 5 subscales derived by factor analysis. It has been extensively used in psychopharmacological studies of ASD and assesses many symptoms that are either central to autism or frequently a target of treatment. The Lethargy/Withdrawal Subscale is derived from 16 items, with a score range from 0-48 where higher scores indicate more severe Lethargy/Withdrawal symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 reported

  3. Mean 8-Week Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-2) Stereotypic Behavior Subscale Score

    The ABC-2 is a 58-item questionnaire with 5 subscales derived by factor analysis. It has been extensively used in psychopharmacological studies of ASD and assesses many symptoms that are either central to autism or frequently a target of treatment. The Stereotypic Behavior Subscale is derived from 7 items, with a score range of 0-21 where higher scores indicate more severe stereotypic behaviors.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 reported

  4. Mean 8-Week Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-2) Hyperactivity Subscale Score

    The ABC-2 is a 58-item questionnaire with 5 subscales derived by factor analysis. It has been extensively used in psychopharmacological studies of ASD and assesses many symptoms that are either central to autism or frequently a target of treatment. The Hyperactivity Subscale is derived from 16 items with a score range of 0-48, where severe scores indicate more severe hyperactivity symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 reported

  5. Mean 8-Week Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC-2) Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score

    The ABC-2 is a 58-item questionnaire with 5 subscales derived by factor analysis. It has been extensively used in psychopharmacological studies of ASD and assesses many symptoms that are either central to autism or frequently a target of treatment. The Inappropriate Speech Subscale is derived from 4 items with a score range of 0-12, where higher scores indicate more severe Inappropriate Speech symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 reported

  6. Mean 8-Week Change in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) Score

    The ADHD-RS is an 18-question, parent-rated assessment reflecting DSM symptoms of ADHD. The score range is 0-54, with higher scores indicating more severe ADHD symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 reported

  7. Mean 8-Week Change in Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) Total Score

    The CSHQ is a 52-question parent survey used to assess sleep difficulties. 33 items are used to generate the total score, which ranges from 33-99, with a cutoff of \>41 suggesting clinically significant sleep problems. Higher scores are indicative of more severe sleep problems.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8; Change from Baseline to Week 8 is reported

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for May 2029, 31 months later.

Of 67 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Autism Spectrum Disorder, half reached primary completion within 39 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 63. This study's planned 31 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 82 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 4, 2026
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 26, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 2029
CompletionEst.
May 2029
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 16, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in United States
Show site
  • Lurie Center · Lexington, United States
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026→Oct 26, 2026
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in United States
    Show site
    • Lurie Center · Lexington, United States
    Start date Oct 1, 2026→Oct 26, 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07812233
Collaborators
Eagles Autism Foundation
Responsible party
Robyn P. Thom, M.D. (Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
Start date
Oct 26, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2029 (estimated)
Completion
May 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Robyn P. Thom, MD
Contact
luriecenterresearch@mgb.org
781-860-1711

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion